backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by PrezWeezy.. on Jun 11 at 2:51 PM

Top spammer caught on 35 counts of fraud, identity theft, money laundering

The war against spam seems to be never-ending, but a small battle was won earlier this week. Robert Alan Soloway, 27, was arrested Wednesday in Seattle on charges of mail fraud, wire fraud, email fraud, aggravated identity theft and money laundering. Soloway pleaded not guilty to all charges.

"Spam is a scourge of the Internet, and Robert Soloway is one of its most prolific practitioners. Our investigators dubbed him the Spam King because he is responsible for millions of spam e-mails," Jeffrey Sullivan, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington, said in a statement.

Soloway allegedly spammed the masses in email fraud since 2003 by using hijacked computers from around the world, and covered his tracks using Chinese servers, fabricated websites and stolen identities.

According to the Washington Post: “Soloway's company, Newport Internet Marketing, defrauded its customers by offering to send a high volume of legitimate e-mail marketing messages or to sell software that could be used in mass mailings. Neither approach performed as advertised but generated a torrent of spam. When customers complained, Soloway allegedly refused to provide assistance or refund the sales, instead threatening to charge them with additional fees and refer them to collections agencies.”

Anti-spam agency Spamhaus once named Soloway in its top ten list of worst offenders, though he’s since been outpaced by even greater threats from eastern Europe. "He is one of the bad ones. He's one of the longest-running and uses criminal methods all the time," said John Reid, an investigator with Spamhaus. "Anyone on the Web for a while would have received one of Soloway's spams."

This isn’t the first time Soloway has run into the legal system for his spamming activities. In 2005, Microsoft won a $7.8 million judgment against him for his spoofing of MSN and Hotmail email addresses. Unfortunately, the $7.8 million could never be collected because Soloway’s funds and bank accounts remained elusive.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: how about...
By Martimus on 6/1/2007 11:29:45 AM , Rating: 3
Wow! That is some pretty powerful dope you are smoking. You should probably cut back before you hurt yourself permanently.


RE: how about...
By Smurfer2 on 6/1/2007 12:01:36 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Wow! That is some pretty powerful dope you are smoking. You should probably cut back before you hurt yourself permanently.


I think you put it best, I can't believe that guy said what he said. He must be crazy!


RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By Roseann on 6/1/07, Rating: 0
RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By johnsonx on 6/5/2007 5:24:58 PM , Rating: 3
lol, nutjobs unite!


RE: how about...
By Oregonian2 on 6/1/2007 3:36:11 PM , Rating: 3
The record profits by the oil companies, last time I looked, was something like 8% of revenue. If Microsoft or Intel made only 8% of gross revenue their stock would drop like a rock and be considered near bankruptcy. It's just that the oil companies are in a business on a very large scale. If one's local hair salon made 10% profits which is 25% greater than those oil companies, I suspect there wouldn't be the fuss -- despite the even greater profit margin.

P.S. - Iraq's oil output is near insignificant percentage-wise compared to world production, and the U.S.'s oil that comes from the entire middle east is something like only 15% of oil usage (most imports are from Mexico/Venezuela). The vast majority of the Middle East oil goes to places like Europe. So whatever the reasons for Iraq are, I don't think it's oil. Maybe it's something more obscure like pomegranate juice and dates (that comes from the middle east).


RE: how about...
By Roseann on 6/1/2007 4:35:28 PM , Rating: 1
This is from a 2006 article. From MSNBC:

"DALLAS - Exxon Mobil Corp. posted record profits for any U.S. company on Monday — $10.71 billion for the fourth quarter and $36.13 billion for the year — as the world’s biggest publicly traded oil company benefited from high oil and natural-gas prices and solid demand for refined products.

The results exceeded Wall Street expectations and Exxon shares rose more than 3 percent in afternoon trading.

The company’s earnings amounted to $1.71 per share for the October-December quarter, up 27 percent from $8.42 billion, or $1.30 per share, in the year ago quarter. The result topped the then-record quarterly profit of $9.92 billion Exxon posted in the third quarter of 2005."

That's quite a chunk of change at the expense of our military. They should foot the bill for this. Not to mention the few billion in cash and oil missing.


RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By PrezWeezy on 6/1/2007 1:13:38 PM , Rating: 1
no man, be nice, ask him to pass it around ;)


RE: how about...
By Martimus on 6/1/2007 1:48:21 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know. He sounds a little unstable, and I don't want to upset him by asking to share his pharmaceuticals. He might slip over the edge and start shooting people or something.


RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By Martimus on 6/1/2007 4:39:18 PM , Rating: 3
You don't know anything about me, or my views on anything. But stating views on a hateful Jewish conspiracy had absolutely nothing to do with this article, so it seemed that you are a little unstable. Actually your attacking responses to me and the other posts are what really made you seem a little unstable. The original post just made you seem like you were on an acid trip.


RE: how about...
By arazok on 6/1/2007 4:41:51 PM , Rating: 4
He didn't call you unstable because your political views are different. He called you unstable because you're clearly insane, and thus highly likely to also be unstable.

Although I'd question the evidence to support conclusions that you are likely to kill someone, the evidence to conclude you are insane is in abundance.

Exhibit A - You are unable to correctly separate your points into paragraphs, suggesting an impaired ability to logically structure your thoughts in a coherent manner.

Exhibit B - When one actually tries to sift through the wall of text, it is clear you are rambling - quickly moving from one point to the next, without taking any of your arguments to conclusion. Probably because there is no conclusion - just the random thoughts of a dysfunctional mind.

Exhibit C - You believe there is a Jewish secret agency of spammers. I don't view Viagra as a tool for achieving world domination. This is laughable on a number of levels. The fact that you can conclude this, despite there never, ever, having been one shred of evidence to even suggest it could be true, shows you have an inability to view events of your life through it's proper context, causing you to base conclusions on disorganized thought processes.

Please see the following information about your condition, and seek medical attention. It's not your fault, and you have nothing to be ashamed of.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia


RE: how about...
By microslice on 6/1/2007 5:02:16 PM , Rating: 2
That's the funniest thing I've ever read!!


RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By johnsonx on 6/5/2007 5:46:55 PM , Rating: 1
Republicans disown ButterFlyEffect78

June 5, 2007 - Washington, D.C. - Mike Duncan, Chairman of the Republican National Committee, was asked about the party affiliation of ButterFlyEffect78. "He's not one of ours, no way. The Republican Party is a big tent party, but not THAT big. We'd rather he didn't even use the word." A national politcal party disowning an individual person is a very unusual step. Asked why it was necessary in this case, Duncan replied "Look, the guy's totally nuts. Just like the Democrats, we've got a nut wing in our party too, and even they didn't want him."


RE: how about...
By johnsonx on 6/5/2007 5:26:32 PM , Rating: 1
Well done Arazok, well done!


RE: how about...
By PrezWeezy on 6/11/2007 2:51:51 PM , Rating: 2
Damnit, and I liked Ron Paul...oh well, I guess I'll have to find someone else.


RE: how about...
By ButterFlyEffect78 on 6/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: how about...
By jtesoro on 6/1/2007 10:55:27 PM , Rating: 2
You forgot to say "Oops, sorry Martimus. That comment was meant for myself."


RE: how about...
By Martimus on 6/4/2007 10:45:41 AM , Rating: 2
I am sorry for insulting you. That wasn't very nice of me.


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Related Articles
The Top 10 Worst Spam Offenders
November 17, 2006, 5:20 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki