Print 54 comment(s) - last by Jonahdaily.. on May 24 at 4:59 AM

Tracks left by Spirit -- Image courtesy of NASA
Findings collected by the Mars rover Spirit gets scientists excited for what other secrets the Red Planet may hide

Scientists have conducted a lot of research to discover signs of water and possible life on Mars.  A recent discovery by a NASA rover has created excitement in the scientific community: the Mars rover Spirit collected soil samples that makes scientists strongly believe Mars was once wet. 

The rover found some Martian soil with high levels of silica, which needs water to crystalize.  Basic chemical analysis on the soil revealed the soil composition contained up to 90 percent silica.  This soil, located in Gusev Crater, is the strongest evidence that water, at some point in the planet's history, existed.

Scientists are unsure how the silica deposit in the crater originally formed.  The most likely theory is that soil mixed with acid vapors, created by volcanic activity, along with a strong presence of water.  Another popular idea is that the silica was created from water from a hot spring.

Spirit's discovery "reinforces the fact that significant amounts of water were present in Mars' past, which continues to spur the hope that we can show that Mars was once habitable and possibly supported life," said Doug McCuistion, NASA Mars exploration program director.

Oddly enough, the silica discovery happened due to a Spirit mechanical problem.  The bright patches of silica-rich soil were discovered when one of the rover's wheels dragged through the topsoil, revealing the bright colored silica-soil underneath.

Scientists are anxious to continue their research to discover what else is on the Red Planet.  Research indicates ice under the Martian surface varies in depth from location to location.
Late last year, NASA researchers used the Mars Global Surveyor to discover water flowed recently on the Red Planet.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: lol
By Vanilla Thunder on 5/22/2007 5:07:19 PM , Rating: 5
During history they have repeatedly changed their stance when proven wrong.

Isn't that the natural progression of ideas? It makes you smarter to change your stance when PROVEN wrong, than to blindly fight for something you know is incorrect.


RE: lol
By ZoZo on 5/22/2007 8:51:59 PM , Rating: 2
But always being proven wrong takes your credibility away.

RE: lol
By P4blo on 5/23/2007 4:37:53 AM , Rating: 1
Exactly. The Church knows nothing about creation, nothing at all. Yet it seems to have a lot to say about it. The ideas it perpetuates about it are generally self serving. So when an institution like that sticks it's neck out and repeatedly gets proven wrong through history, some people are going to delight in calling them fraudsters.

The church can tell me thou shalt not this that and the other if it likes. But dont tell me Earth was knocked up in a week and evolution doesn't exist.

RE: lol
By zsdersw on 5/23/2007 6:28:43 AM , Rating: 2
Intelligent Design is their bridge between pure faith and the realities of science that are all around them.

I'm not sure what subject Intelligent Design would be most suited for in school, because it's certainly not science.. and it's not really theology or religion either. Maybe that means it shouldn't be taught at all. :)

RE: lol
By vortmax on 5/23/2007 11:39:56 AM , Rating: 3
Intelligent Design is just a politically correct term for Creationism. I wouldn't say it's a comprimise between faith and science.

Science hasn't come any closer in determining how everything came into existence. It has revealed however, based on the extreme complexity of life on Earth, pointed us even more towards an Intelligent Designer.

RE: lol
By cupocoffee on 5/23/2007 6:08:48 PM , Rating: 2
Intelligent Design is just a politically correct term for Creationism.

Actually, this is not necessarily true. Intelligent Design can be used by creationists to support their views. However, the concept itself simply states that the complexity of the universe implies that someone designed it. Technically, this somebody could be an alien or it could be God. My point: Intelligent Design does not label the designer.

Think of Intelligent Design as being analogous to forensics. Forensics is based on the idea that evidence at a scene can be collected and analyzed to determine how events occurred and whether or not they were "designed" by an intelligent mind.

RE: lol
By cupocoffee on 5/23/2007 6:21:02 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure what subject Intelligent Design would be most suited for in school, because it's certainly not science..

Please give evidence for why you think it is not science. Common themes of Intelligent Design include irreducible complexity, fine tuning of universal natural constants, concepts of what is and is not information, and the probabilities that the above can occur through naturalistic means.

I don't see how investigations into such topics is unscientific unless if you are a hard core materialist who believes as a premise that science is most certainly naturalistic despite any proof given against that notion. I myself adhere to the empirical platform of science.

“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki