backtop


Print 23 comment(s) - last by TomZ.. on May 18 at 9:20 AM


Lenovo X60 Tablet
Lenovo readies its "Santa Rosa" follow-up to the X60 and X60 Tablet

Lenovo rolled out its ThinkPad X60 Tablet PC back in November to complement its existing ThinkPad X60 notebook. The 3.8 pound, Core 2 Duo-based Tablet PC comes with a 12.1" screen which can be had in resolutions of XGA (1024x768) or SXGA+ (1400x1050).

Now that Intel's Santa Rosa platform has been officially announced, Lenovo has begun to slowly transition its product lines to the latest technology. The company has already made the T60 to T61 transition as well as the R60 to R61 switch. Next is the Santa Rosa follow-up to the X60 and X60 Tablet.

The X61 and X61 Tablet PC retain the same chassis as their X60 and X60 Tablet PC predecessors along with the XGA and SXGA+ screen resolutions. The switch to Santa Rosa brings 800MHz FSB Core 2 Duo processors, the Intel GM965 Express Chipset, GMA X3100 integrated graphics chipset and Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN network adapter.

According to Notebook Review, the X61 will also have the option of up to 1GB of Intel Turbo Memory. Although Intel has been touting Turbo Memory as being beneficial to notebook performance, recent testing has shown that performance is mixed.

Expect pricing to stay close to the current X60 and X60 Tablet PCs which start at $1,251.75 and $1,495.50 respectively. The new notebooks will be available in June.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 1990 Resolution
By Masterrer on 5/17/2007 7:48:33 AM , Rating: 4
It amuses me how people jump on the resolution bandwagon...

<sarcasm>
Hey look at me, my 99 inch plasma has an uber resolution of 1600000000x120000000, it is so awesome, and so much better than that crappy 19 inch 1280x1024 monitor I had, I hook my pc to the plasma to work with Word and Excel, and browse the web and it is so much better…
</sarcasm>

Please do not assume something like "higher res = better" without some facts to support this statement, believe me there is so much to monitors than higher res and viewing angles…

If we are talking about resolution, bare in mind that it is actually the pixel density that counts known as dpi (or dots per inch). You can see how dpi varies with monitor size, and affects object/text size here:
http://www.behardware.com/medias/photos_news/00/18...
http://www.behardware.com/medias/photos_news/00/19...


RE: 1990 Resolution
By TomZ on 5/17/2007 8:37:17 AM , Rating: 1
No, that's wrong - higher resolution - especially higher DPI - is always better. You'll see that in the future with higher resolution displays on computers, and you're already seeing it in some consumer electronics, e.g., Apple iPhone.

Higher DPI gives you better graphical experience from both an aesthetic perspective and a functional one. Aesthetics are improved because obviously more detail can be drawn. Functionality is also improved because it allows you to show more of a document, more of your spreadsheet, more of your code editor, more of your desktop, etc. As long as you have high DPI, you can use smaller text sizes and have it still readable (assuming you have good vision of course).

I run dual 2048x1536 20" monitors on my main computer, which gives me lots of desktop screen real estate. In my experience, more screen real estate gives a positive productivity boost.

I do agree, however, that you can't get too carried away with resolution away on a 12" screen. But people thinking about things the way I do would never consider such a small screen, except maybe just as an e-mail only ultra-portable.


RE: 1990 Resolution
By TomZ on 5/17/2007 9:09:20 AM , Rating: 2
sorry, I meant "...you can get too carried away with resolution on a 12" screen..."


RE: 1990 Resolution
By Masterrer on 5/17/2007 9:09:40 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I do agree, however, that you can't get too carried away with resolution away on a 12" screen. But people thinking about things the way I do would never consider such a small screen, except maybe just as an e-mail only ultra-portable.

Well I don't think that the engineers intended this Tablet PC for professional work, it was designed with mobility and usability in mind, and I don't think it was intended for designers/artist as a desktop replacement...
What I do think, is that such a tablet is good what it's designed for, it allows one to stay mobile (check e-mail, surf the web, basic edit of documents be it some php code or an annual report)
Now if only someone would make a similar device for around 800$… wishful thinking


RE: 1990 Resolution
By TomZ on 5/17/2007 10:51:43 AM , Rating: 1
I certainly understand that, but the reason for my criticism is that it seems like nearly all laptops have low-resolution displays. I would have hoped that high-res displays would have become mainstream more quickly than they have. Obvioulsly the cost is related to the volume, and since most people are choosing low-res displays, it doesn't help.


RE: 1990 Resolution
By tekzor on 5/17/2007 1:31:02 PM , Rating: 2
yes it is designed for the professional
Why would you use it to check email when a PDA already does that? Obviosuly the low resolution is perfect for office tasks. This ISNT a UMPC!
The point of the form factor and tablet ability IS to bring it out with you into the world for business use wether inside or out.
What you expect to do on it? Play games?


RE: 1990 Resolution
By goku on 5/18/2007 3:47:37 AM , Rating: 2
I think you're confusing digital cameras and monitors considerably. Most monitors are of relative decent quality so more pixels=better picture, however for digital cameras, they seem to push more pixels but they don't bother upgrading the sensor so it's really just all for waste as the pictures are much crappier on a cheap 8mega pixel P&S then a 3 megapixel SLR.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki