backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by Maxmars.. on May 16 at 11:14 PM

The telescope Hubble's successor is scheduled to launch in June 2013

NASA officials unveiled a model of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), a new telescope which is expected to replace the aging Hubble space telescope.  The $4.5 billion space telescope is bigger than the Hubble and will sit further from Earth.  The total expected cost of the project is almost $3 billion cheaper than the original Hubble project.

The JWST will be 80ft long by 40ft. high and will have a mirror nearly three times the size of the one used on the Hubble.  The 21ft. mirror will allow scientists to see further into the history of space.  Norhrop Grumman, the contractor responsible for building the JWST telescope, expects it to have a 10-year lifespan.

The full-scale model of the JWST is currently on display near the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.  Although budget issues continue to plague NASA, all technical and cost schedules have reportedly been met for the past 20 months.

"We're making excellent progress in meeting all of our plans and commitments for a mid-2013 launch," said Martin Mohan, a Northrop Grumman project manager.

Until JWST is launched, NASA plans on continuing to service the Hubble -- NASA plans on launching at least one mission designed specifically for Hubble repair.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: sad
By jskirwin on 5/15/2007 9:29:10 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think it has become more unstable than before.


Tell me, when was Middle East ever stable? At least the Iraqis have a fighting chance at peace, something they have never ever had - and would be damned to eternal slavery if you so-called "liberals" had your way.

And one segment of Iraq is already living quite peacefully: the Kurds. In 1988 they were being gassed; today they are watching the Sunnis and Shiites beat the crap out of each other. Meanwhile their economy grows, as do their ambitions.


RE: sad
By Ringold on 5/15/2007 10:29:56 PM , Rating: 2
The Roman's had them under their heel pretty well, until they started to become weak. When the half-measures and apathy started to flow, the Arabs, Persians, and so-called "barbarians" could smell the blood in the water, and we all know what ended up happening there. History doesn't repeat itself, no, never.


RE: sad
By tmarat on 5/16/2007 4:46:12 AM , Rating: 2
What makes you think you know what Iraqis want?
One segment might be living peacefully, but others (majority) are in a bloody fight.


RE: sad
By HubbleBubble on 5/16/2007 12:36:59 PM , Rating: 2
> At least the Iraqis have a fighting chance at peace,
> something they have never ever had - and would be
> damned to eternal slavery if you so-called "liberals"
> had your way.

Let's see...since the 2003 invasion: Two thirds of a million
dead and three and a half million driven out of their homes in
fear - two million fleeing the country altogether, putting
enormous strain on and further increasing tensions in
neighbouring countries. The majority of Iraq's population
want us out and over half actually support attacks on coalition
forces.
...Because you "right-wingers" had your way. You must be proud. LOL


"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki