Attempts to censor a string of letters and numbers stirred Internet users to overwhelm Digg.com and other websites to change their legal position on censorship. The offending string? An AACS encryption key used to protect HD DVD and Blu-ray Discs.
Cory Doctorow, instructor at the Annenberg School for
Communication at the University of Southern California, was one of those
affected. He removed
a blog post from his class website containing a string of letters and
numbers used in defeating the copy protection behind HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc.
Keys used in the AACS protection used by both
high-definition optical formats were uncovered earlier this year when a crafty
individual who goes by the name “Muslix64” found a way to circumvent HD DVD
encryption. He then applied his techniques
to Blu-ray Disc, and was met with equal success. Then in mid-February, another
hacker named “arnezami” discovered a single encryption key that would unlock
the protections of every HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc on the market. Previously,
every HD movie needed its own unique key in order to be decrypted; but with arnezami’s
discovery, there was one
key to rule them all.
The high-def skeleton key circulated the more clever areas
of the Internet without much fanfare until two months later, when word of the
AACS legal threats to Google hit. Certain stories concerning the HD DVD
encryption key were submitted to traffic-tool site Digg.com, only to quickly be
deleted by the site’s operators.
The website’s users began to notice the acts of censorship,
but fought hard by submitting even more stories surrounding the AACS key.
Eventually, the number of key-related stories on Digg rose to over 80, with
each story receiving as many as thousands of votes from its users. Even when the site administrators attempted to censor all the stories, the users
Eventually, Jay Adelson of Digg addressed the matter in a blog post saying, “I just wanted to
explain what some of you have been noticing around some stories that have been
submitted to Digg on the HD DVD encryption key being cracked.”
“We’ve been notified by the owners of this intellectual
property that they believe the posting of the encryption key infringes their
intellectual property rights. In order to respect these rights and to comply
with the law, we have removed postings of the key that have been brought to our
attention,” Adelson wrote.
He continues, “Whether you agree or disagree with the
policies of the intellectual property holders and consortiums, in order for
Digg to survive, it must abide by the law ... Our goal is always to maintain a
purely democratic system for the submission and sharing of information - and we
want Digg to continue to be a great resource for finding the best content.
However, in order for that to happen, we all need to work together to protect
Digg from exposure to lawsuits that could very quickly shut us down.”
Wikipedia, another website primarily driven by content provided by users, had locked the section dedicated to discussing a particular string of letters and numbers pertaining to HD DVD. However, Wikipedia reopened the section to users again earlier today.
A Digg user contributed his calculations estimating that over
50,500 diggs, or positive votes for the story, had accumulated by Tuesday
evening – and that number continued to grow, showing the Internet community’s
strong feelings towards the freedom of information and the disgust over the censorship
of simple letters and numbers.
After insurmountable pressure from users of the site, Digg
founder Kevin Rose decided to change the
tune of his Web site’s previous position. He explained, “We’ve always given
site moderation (digging/burying) power to the community. Occasionally we step
illegal downloads, racial hate sites, etc.). So today was a difficult day for
us. We had to decide whether to remove stories containing a single code based
on a cease and desist declaration. We had to make a call, and in our desire to
avoid a scenario where Digg would be interrupted or shut down, we decided to
comply and remove the stories with the code.”
“But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading
thousands of comments, you’ve made it clear,” Rose continued. “You’d rather see
Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and
effective immediately we won’t delete stories or comments containing the code
and will deal with whatever the consequences might be. If we lose, then what
the hell, at least we died trying.”
quote: The true "evildoer" here is the AACS and all the many groups like them who feel it's OK to turn ordinary people into criminals by forcing them to pay for what they already own so they can use it with a different piece of technology.
quote: Digg could be shutdown to US users if they are found to be contributing to copyright infringement by refusing to remove intellectual property that has been stolen.
quote: quote: "Is posting a string of hex really contributing to copyright infringement?" Uh gee I don't know.... If you give someone the key to a locked safe, and they unlock the safe and steal everything inside it, is that "really contributing" to the crime?
quote: "Is posting a string of hex really contributing to copyright infringement?"
quote: Uh gee I don't know.... If you give someone the key to a locked safe, and they unlock the safe and steal everything inside it, is that "really contributing" to the crime?
quote: If you make copies of the key and give them out to everyone you meet, then you are committing a crime
quote: What's happening here is that the AACS and their affilliates are attempting to force us all to purchase multiple copies of the same IP in order to use it in different ways.
quote: Uh... Copyright is not a new concept.It's been the same deal since the first published BOOK.Open a book some time and take a look at the inside cover...
quote: When you buy a book (or movie, or computer program...) you don't buy the rights to it, just ownership of that hard copy, with limited rights to make further copies (only for fair use, etc...)
quote: Just because a law is inconvienent for you doesn't give you the right to break it on a whim.
quote: But some of you crybaby idiots saying that "this is against the law" obviously have no foundation upon which to make such an assertion. You simply prattle on endlessly about how this is a violation of copyright law, as if you are DMCA lawyers. Well, perhaps you should go to law school and STFU in the meantime.I have a right to access the data on any CD or DVD I purchase, and that right was first granted to me when it was officially made legal to record TV shows on a video recorder. Again, simple as that.