Print 10 comment(s) - last by DeepBlue1975.. on May 2 at 9:47 AM

With the G0 stepping of the Kentsfield CPU core, Intel will lower the TDP of several quad-core products by 10W.

Intel recently notified its customers about a future stepping change of several quad-core processors based on the Kentsfield core. Current Xeon X3220 and X3210 processors as well as the Core 2 Quad Q6600 model are based on the CPU core codenamed Kentsfield (consisting of two Conroe dice combined to a multi-chip module) in B3 stepping. Their TDP is currently specified ad 105W.

In the PCN 107463-00 Intel explains that on the 16th of July the company will be able to supply a new G0 stepping of this core which allows to cut the TDP down to 95W. This allows the use of the new CPUs in environments qualified for the "2005 Mainstream FMB" (up to 95W) as opposed to the "2005 Performance FMB" (up to 130W).

Apart from the fact that the new CPUs will feature different CPUIDs and S-spec codes, Intel doesn't expect any impact on customers, as the featureset remains unchanged and electrical, mechanical and thermal specifications remain within current specifications. A BIOS update will be required to recognize the new CPU.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: should run cooler = better oc
By someguy123 on 4/28/2007 10:01:33 PM , Rating: 3

not exactly sure what he ment by "real quad" when two die on a single chip is quad and probably better than multisocket solutions due to lower latencies, unless he ment a double socket motherboard with two duals...but then again with that logic two dualcore would be "fake" dualcore so it'd have to be a four socket motherboard.

anyway the Q6600 and future core2duo quads look to be great buys unless AMD comes up with something soon.

RE: should run cooler = better oc
By Ratwar on 4/28/2007 10:24:01 PM , Rating: 2
It is quite simple, he meant that he is an AMD fanboy who can only take comfort in bashing Intel for using a different setup for Quad cores (which he deems less worthy than AMD's setup, even though their real world performance hasn't been measured on the record yet) because his chosen company currently lacks the performance crown.

This state of mind (some would call it his disease) is closely associated with overpaying for computer hardware, but the exact reason for this remains unknown.

RE: should run cooler = better oc
By Shintai on 4/29/2007 6:20:51 AM , Rating: 2
I just take the one with the highest performance. true quadcore or not. I dont care, only about performance and power consumption.

By mountcarlmore on 4/28/2007 10:26:23 PM , Rating: 3
what he meant by "real" quad is four cores on one die... regardless, two or one dies, it makes no real difference.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Latest By Marcus Pollice
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
Intel Readies Merom-L Core
April 7, 2007, 9:16 PM
NVIDIA Holds Back "G84, G86" Cards
March 23, 2007, 7:08 PM
CeBIT 2007: GeForce 8600 Spotted
March 14, 2007, 1:19 PM
NVIDIA Not Present CeBIT
February 25, 2007, 7:36 PM
NVIDIA's Current Driver Mess
February 12, 2007, 7:32 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki