backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 24 comment(s) - last by masher2.. on Apr 29 at 3:06 PM


This diagram of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) shows how it converts methanol and oxygen into electrical power, heat, carbon dioxide and water. (Source: Campus Micro Technologies)
A new invention is heating up interest in methanol fuel cells for powering portable devices.

Mobile phones and other personal electronics that run on fuel cells instead of conventional batteries came a little closer to reality recently, thanks to an invention by Taiwanese researchers.

The boost toward commercial viability for fuel cells comes courtesy of a new filtering technology developed by a team from National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan. According to New Scientist magazine, the invention involves a device that filters out byproducts that can reduce the efficiency of "direct methanol" fuel cells (DMFCs). Significantly, the filtering technology does not require extra power.

DMFCs are a promising technology for portable electronics, mainly because methanol does not require complicated catalytic reforming and the gas is much easier to store than that of hydrogen, which requires high pressure or low temperatures. However, DMFCs have been limited in the amount of power they can produce, owing in part to the difficulty of managing the carbon dioxide and other byproducts that are created when the fuel is oxidized.

The National Tsing Hua team has tackled the problem by designing a device that removes the CO2 and other waste products, namely water and methanol vapor, using a passive filtering system. The filter is equipped with about 100 50-micron holes that allow excess CO2 to escape in the atmosphere. The holes are also treated with a water-repelling Teflon coating that wicks the liquid into a collection reservoir without drawing any of the fuel cell's precious power output.

Samsung and Toshiba are among a number of major electronics makers that have shown interest in harnessing DMFCs for powering mobile phones and related products.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Maybe a silly question...
By JarredWalton on 4/26/2007 3:18:55 AM , Rating: 2
...but are fuel cells a "one shot" battery, or can they easily be recharged/refilled? If the filtering is necessary for DMFCs, then it seems at the very least we would need to "change our fuel cell filters" periodically. Still, depending on power density, this could be very cool. Personally, I'd just like to see lower power devices that can easily run off solar power while still providing high performance. Might make taking laptops out into the sun more viable, if they can make the displays brighter. :)




RE: Maybe a silly question...
By PlasmaBomb on 4/26/2007 3:39:30 AM , Rating: 3
The filter is coated in PTFE (Teflon) so should be pretty inert and not need changing too regularly. So you should be able to just top up the methanol/water mix and drain the water byproducts out. It will be a fair while before laptops run off solar power.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By alifbaa on 4/26/2007 9:20:20 AM , Rating: 2
When they've talked about these fuel cells before, they've referred to them as single use devices. While it's technically feasible to refill them, I doubt the first generation will feature that capability. Do you know if methanol is flammable? That would probably be a big issue to overcome too.

Maybe a year and a half ago an article mentioned they'd be $1.50/battery and provide around 10 hours of use in a typical laptop.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By TheTerl on 4/26/2007 10:03:03 AM , Rating: 2
Methanol is fairly volatile around room and typical operating temperatures, but it's still a liquid. Presumably all power would be disconnected while the fuel cell is removed, so there wouldn't be much chance of a spark. Overall, I'd say the risk of fire is not too high for typical kinds of household use.

The main issue with methanol is that when consumed, it's quite toxic (actually, it's the biological byproducts that are toxic, but for all practical purposes they're the same). It's nasty stuff, but so long as you don't drink it or leave it out for the kids to play with, there's no more risk storing methanol in your home than, say, household bleach.

Sorry for the long response, but the short answer is there's no particular health or safety reason why you wouldn't be able to refill them--it just might not be as profitable for the manufacturers.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By PlasmaBomb on 4/26/2007 12:01:18 PM , Rating: 2
It depends on the technology being used in the particular device; some (apparently like this one if the pic is correct) run on ~30% methanol in water. This makes a methanol leak safer as it is slightly lower than the concentration of methanol required to ignite. As for being refillable it really is up to the manufacturer, but in this day and age of environmentalists do you really think a disposable fuel cell would be as welcome as one that can be refilled?


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By dnd728 on 4/26/2007 4:07:20 PM , Rating: 2
A company named Medis Technologies have already started selling single use (I believe) fuel cells this month - the ones Microsoft just bought for "promotional giveaways"...
Hopefully we'll have refillables not too far in the future.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By dnd728 on 4/26/2007 4:10:24 PM , Rating: 3
RE: Maybe a silly question...
By Calin on 4/26/2007 11:24:32 AM , Rating: 2
The water byproducts could be drained by evaporation (in order to cool the fuel cell).
Laptops running under solar power? A quarter square meter being all the surface a laptop could dedicate to solar panels, would bring a power of 25W at most (100W per square meter). As people prefer not to work in direct sunlight, this will come down some more.
Could solar panels be installed on laptops? Yes, but I don't think this makes sense


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By PlasmaBomb on 4/26/2007 12:04:09 PM , Rating: 2
Water products could be drained by evaporation; it depends on how much is produced in a given time and how hot the device runs. Like so many things the devil is in the detail...


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By Hypernova on 4/26/2007 6:28:40 AM , Rating: 2
With this filter it will make it easier to top up the cell like you would a tank of gas.

While batteries many be less messy once you run it flat in a place with out mains or generators you are stuck. It it much easier to just carry a tank of meth with you in those case compared to very big/heavy/easy-to-break solar panels to do the same job.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By End Of Times on 4/26/2007 9:37:58 AM , Rating: 2
Methanol is flammable; I can’t see airlines and certain other industries letting you take a top up can of flammable fuel in your laptop case.
I see solar panels having a better future with laptops than fuel cells.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By masher2 (blog) on 4/26/07, Rating: 0
RE: Maybe a silly question...
By teldar on 4/26/2007 10:54:56 AM , Rating: 2
Depending on the efficiency of solar panels, as in they become several times as efficient as they are now, which seems likely, there could well be hybrid laptops with a thin layer of the newly developed plastic battery just beneath the solar panel, and they could operate on either fuel cell or polymer battery charged by solar panel.

Teldar


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By masher2 (blog) on 4/26/2007 11:16:42 AM , Rating: 1
> "as in they become several times as efficient as they are now..."

Assume three times the efficiency of current mc-Si cells, and you could power a 40 watt laptop with solar cells the size of the top panel. If you were outside, at around noon under a clear day, at a fairly low latitude...and, most important of all, if you kept the top panel roughly perpendicular to incident solar radiation. Which I don't see how you're going to do while using it.

Anywhere and anytime else, you can't use it period, even if you could keep the lid oriented properly. Add to that the additional weight of the solar cells and the fact that 95% of all laptop use is indoors, and I just don't see this thing ever flying, even if you do assume cells much more efficient than they are today.

Move a few decades in the future now, and assume laptops that can run on well under 5 watts, and it becomes much more practical.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By End Of Times on 4/26/2007 11:59:18 AM , Rating: 2
I don’t think anyone is talking about running laptops on solar panels only; it’s just a way of making your currant batteries and future batteries extend longer.
With higher capacity more efficient batteries, power efficient solid state drivers, lower power 45Nm CPU’s, and other chips entering the market extending battery life, it makes some sense that solar panels should play a role also.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By PlasmaBomb on 4/26/2007 12:12:23 PM , Rating: 2
That's 45nm not Nm (they are different). The real killer is incident radiation as masher2 pointed out, you could get around it by having the solar cells external to the laptop, but that wouldn't be great for portability.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By Geneo on 4/27/2007 12:12:53 AM , Rating: 2
Something you might like to read on solar efficiency and what angles they can be used at, thanks to carbon nanotubes.

http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=1763.php


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By masher2 (blog) on 4/27/2007 6:52:54 AM , Rating: 2
Thanks; I'm actually familiar with the PV work being done at the GTRI, but I have to point out that this development-- if and when its ever succesfully commercialized-- increases cell efficiency over a wider range of angles, but it doesn't solve the basic angle of incidence problem itself. A solar cell at steep angles to impinging sunlight is intercepting only a small fraction of the light it otherwise would. Its a basic geometrical limitation, and one of the two reasons the Earth is colder in winter than summer.

Similarly, if you're outside when the sun is directly overhead, sit down and pop open your laptop, the top panel is going to be at a near-right angle to impinging sunlight. And 3D-nanostructures or not, it therefore has access to a tiny fraction of the total radiation it otherwise would, and isn't going to be outputting significant power.


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By MarkHark on 4/28/2007 7:00:48 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
...one of the two reasons the Earth is colder in winter than summer.


Two?? The other one being... what?
Distance from the sun does not aplly here. Don't forget, whenever it's summer on the northern hemisphere, it's winter in the southern, so every argument has to work both ways. ;)


RE: Maybe a silly question...
By masher2 (blog) on 4/29/2007 3:06:07 PM , Rating: 3
> "Two?? The other one being... what?"

Less hours of sunlight. The solar flux is weaker, and there's less of it. You are correct that distance from the sun itself has nothing to do with it...during the Northern hemisphere's winter, the sun is actually slightly closer.


hydrogen CAN be stored easily
By m104 on 4/26/2007 11:43:44 AM , Rating: 2
"and the gas is much easier to store than that of hydrogen, which requires high pressure or low temperatures"

danish scientists have developed a way to store hydrogen in so called "hydrogen-pills" - little pills that cant be set on fire, that stores the hydrogen with a high "compression-rate"... these pills would b ideal for rtansport and such - making it possible to use them for safe carfuel...
but is the world ready to make this technology the standard fuel-solution for upcomming hydrogen fuel-stations? - thats the question....




RE: hydrogen CAN be stored easily
By bldckstark on 4/26/2007 12:55:32 PM , Rating: 2
Hydrogen pills would be awful hard to light on fire in an engine. Also, the hydrogen has to be a gas or liquid to work in a fuel cell.

There would have to be a way to convert these "pills" to a fluid form for them to be useful in anything except an external combustion engine.


RE: hydrogen CAN be stored easily
By m104 on 4/26/2007 4:20:15 PM , Rating: 2
there is... i thought it was obvious so i neglected to mention it... i dont recall how exactly the hydrogen is extracted from the pills - but i do remember that its a simple chemical procedure that wont be power consuming itself - at all... so there is no hurdle there... the "hurdle" is to produce the hydrogen at low cost. Currently the cost of hydrogen is 2-3 times that of currently used fuel


RE: hydrogen CAN be stored easily
By TheTerl on 4/26/2007 6:52:10 PM , Rating: 2
I've never heard it described as a pill, but there are researchers all over the world working on metal hydrides for hydrogen storage. The idea is that hydrogen atoms are so small, they can be stored inside the atomic structure of a metal. When hydrogen is needed, a very gentle amount of heat or pressure change causes it to come off as gas, where it can be burned or used in a fuel cell. The energy density is far less than pressurized hydrogen gas, but it also doesn't have the serious safety issues. The main difference, though, is that these "pills" are not fuel--they're storage for hydrogen, which is the fuel.


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton











botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki