AMD Posts $611 Million Net Loss in Q1
April 19, 2007 9:13 AM
comment(s) - last by
Q1 2007 performance is "disappointing and unacceptable" says AMD's chief financial officer
Ten days ago, AMD announced that it was planning to restructure its business due to a significant drop in quarterly revenue. At the time, the company was projecting its Q1 revenue to come in at $1.225 billion USD.
The official numbers are in and AMD has reported Q1 revenue of $1.233 billion USD and an net loss of $611 million USD. The numbers include a charge of $113 million USD due to the acquisition of ATI and $28 million USD for employee stock-based compensation expenses. AMD had revenue of $1.773 billion USD in Q4 2006.
The ongoing price war between AMD and Intel is partially to blame for the reduced earnings. Intel has been
aggressively cutting prices on its current processors
and AMD has been
quick to respond
. AMD as a result has witnessed lower average selling prices (ASPs) in addition to lower unit sales.
"After more than three years of successfully executing our customer expansion strategy and significantly growing our unit and revenue base, our first quarter performance is disappointing and unacceptable," said AMD CFO Robert J. Rivet. "We are aggressively addressing the issues that led to our significant revenue decline. We are aligning our business model, capital expenditures and cost structure with the goal of accelerating our return to profitability. Lastly, our customer relationships remain solid, reflecting their confidence in our strategic direction, current and new products, and technology roadmaps."
On a positive note, AMD reported $197 million USD in revenue from its graphics division in Q1 2007. This represented a 19 percent gain from Q4 2006. AMD's next generation DirectX 10-based R600 graphics processor is expected to launch within the next few weeks. The top of the line
AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
will feature 320 stream processors, 512-bit memory interface with eight channels, native CrossFire support, 128-bit HDR rendering, 24x anti-aliasing and HDMI output with 5.1 surround sound.
Looking to the near future, AMD plans to get its
65nm native quad-core
out the door during Q3. AMD has high hopes for the processors which will incorporate 2MB of L3 cache and AMD Virtualization (AMD-V) technology. "We expect across a wide variety of workloads for
by 40 percent
," said AMD's corporate vice president for server and workstation products, Randy Allen in January.
The company will not, however, begin production of 45nm processors until the first half of 2008. 45nm processors won’t actually ship until the second half of 2008.
Intel is well aware of AMD's plans and many have suggested that the company released
early performance numbers for its quad-core
to divert attention away from AMD's upcoming
. Intel's 45nm
taped-out in January
and will begin shipping in the
latter half of 2007
-- roughly a year ahead of AMD's first 45nm processor.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: K10 is very important now
4/22/2007 9:07:25 PM
They already Built a QuadFx..... nobody came ;-)
RE: K10 is very important now
Laughing all the way 2220
Laughing all the way 2220
4/23/2007 7:32:38 PM
Yes Intel has deep pockets but that doesn't mean they always have the best technology. It goes back and forth, back and forth. Just because AMD posted a loss after integrating ATI- come on people that was like expected. This will not hurt AMD that much. What they have gained is something that will cost Intel a bundle to match- but I don't see Intel heading the integrated graphic-CPU core direction.
So AMD posted a loss big deal. Intel posted a loss last year as well.
It's so tiring and such a bore to hear the banter back and forth. Intel has always had and probably always will a powerful single chip solution. AMD has countered with an excellent chip but with incredible intercommunication between CPUs for multi-proc systems. Intel is the champ and AMD is the underdog challenger. If AMD could knock out Intel it would take years! Innovation will win the day and I don't see much of that in the Intel camp. Intead they've passed off Netburst as giving the user a better internet experience. Yes I've been to the Intel tradeshows. They need to come up with practical, unique ideas not just copy what AMD is doing.
"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay
Intel Unveils "Penryn" Performance
April 17, 2007, 9:11 PM
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
ATI Releases More "R600" Details
April 12, 2007, 8:06 PM
AMD Cuts Prices on High-end Processors
April 9, 2007, 6:40 PM
Aggressive Intel Quad-core Price Cuts Before "Barcelona"
March 14, 2007, 10:21 AM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information