AMD Posts $611 Million Net Loss in Q1
April 19, 2007 9:13 AM
comment(s) - last by
Q1 2007 performance is "disappointing and unacceptable" says AMD's chief financial officer
Ten days ago, AMD announced that it was planning to restructure its business due to a significant drop in quarterly revenue. At the time, the company was projecting its Q1 revenue to come in at $1.225 billion USD.
The official numbers are in and AMD has reported Q1 revenue of $1.233 billion USD and an net loss of $611 million USD. The numbers include a charge of $113 million USD due to the acquisition of ATI and $28 million USD for employee stock-based compensation expenses. AMD had revenue of $1.773 billion USD in Q4 2006.
The ongoing price war between AMD and Intel is partially to blame for the reduced earnings. Intel has been
aggressively cutting prices on its current processors
and AMD has been
quick to respond
. AMD as a result has witnessed lower average selling prices (ASPs) in addition to lower unit sales.
"After more than three years of successfully executing our customer expansion strategy and significantly growing our unit and revenue base, our first quarter performance is disappointing and unacceptable," said AMD CFO Robert J. Rivet. "We are aggressively addressing the issues that led to our significant revenue decline. We are aligning our business model, capital expenditures and cost structure with the goal of accelerating our return to profitability. Lastly, our customer relationships remain solid, reflecting their confidence in our strategic direction, current and new products, and technology roadmaps."
On a positive note, AMD reported $197 million USD in revenue from its graphics division in Q1 2007. This represented a 19 percent gain from Q4 2006. AMD's next generation DirectX 10-based R600 graphics processor is expected to launch within the next few weeks. The top of the line
AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
will feature 320 stream processors, 512-bit memory interface with eight channels, native CrossFire support, 128-bit HDR rendering, 24x anti-aliasing and HDMI output with 5.1 surround sound.
Looking to the near future, AMD plans to get its
65nm native quad-core
out the door during Q3. AMD has high hopes for the processors which will incorporate 2MB of L3 cache and AMD Virtualization (AMD-V) technology. "We expect across a wide variety of workloads for
by 40 percent
," said AMD's corporate vice president for server and workstation products, Randy Allen in January.
The company will not, however, begin production of 45nm processors until the first half of 2008. 45nm processors won’t actually ship until the second half of 2008.
Intel is well aware of AMD's plans and many have suggested that the company released
early performance numbers for its quad-core
to divert attention away from AMD's upcoming
. Intel's 45nm
taped-out in January
and will begin shipping in the
latter half of 2007
-- roughly a year ahead of AMD's first 45nm processor.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: caught sleeping
4/20/2007 9:17:16 PM
I agree with all you said, its true that AMD64 should have been selling with major oems in 2003 with its introduction of the opteron64, yet it was Intel's bad ways that kept them from being able to sell their better technology. The 754's were good performers, but the 939 single core, and x2 variants simply embarrassed Intel's offerings at the time of P4 and Pentium D as far as performance, yet never sold a fraction of the amount of units. That was the time for AMD for live it up and soak up the bank, they had a superior platform from A64's release in 2003 all the way to core 2 duo in 2006, yet only gained major OEM support at the end of that reign.
Intel has been selling the crap out of Netburst for 5-6 years now, it was a better cpu than AMD's offerings from time to time with a northwood or two, or a few other cpu's, yet how could P4 reign so long without the business practices Intel has practiced?
Now A64 is the aging cpu architecture and the core2 duo is the performance king that A64 was to P4, perhaps if AMD profited properly from their ace architecture (A64) in the time of its greatness) things would be different now indeed.
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
Intel Unveils "Penryn" Performance
April 17, 2007, 9:11 PM
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
ATI Releases More "R600" Details
April 12, 2007, 8:06 PM
AMD Cuts Prices on High-end Processors
April 9, 2007, 6:40 PM
Aggressive Intel Quad-core Price Cuts Before "Barcelona"
March 14, 2007, 10:21 AM
3/7/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 7, 2014, 10:19 AM
Quick Note: OCZ Z-Drive 4500 PCIe SSD Gets Official
March 4, 2014, 9:53 AM
3/4/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 4, 2014, 8:45 AM
2/27/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 27, 2014, 11:54 AM
2/26/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 26, 2014, 10:28 AM
AVADirect Unleashes High-End Supermicro, Tyan GPU Servers
February 7, 2014, 12:35 PM
Most Popular Articles
Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 Made Wild Altitude Changes
March 14, 2014, 9:21 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
HTC One Leaks: LED Smart Cover, Carrier Models, Google Play Ed.
March 11, 2014, 5:30 PM
Apple Authorized to Seek $40 Per Device Against Samsung
March 13, 2014, 4:31 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information