Print 75 comment(s) - last by crystal clear.. on Apr 25 at 12:48 AM

Q1 2007 performance is "disappointing and unacceptable" says AMD's chief financial officer

Ten days ago, AMD announced that it was planning to restructure its business due to a significant drop in quarterly revenue. At the time, the company was projecting its Q1 revenue to come in at $1.225 billion USD.

The official numbers are in and AMD has reported Q1 revenue of $1.233 billion USD and an net loss of $611 million USD. The numbers include a charge of $113 million USD due to the acquisition of ATI and $28 million USD for employee stock-based compensation expenses. AMD had revenue of $1.773 billion USD in Q4 2006.

The ongoing price war between AMD and Intel is partially to blame for the reduced earnings. Intel has been aggressively cutting prices on its current processors and AMD has been quick to respond. AMD as a result has witnessed lower average selling prices (ASPs) in addition to lower unit sales.

"After more than three years of successfully executing our customer expansion strategy and significantly growing our unit and revenue base, our first quarter performance is disappointing and unacceptable," said AMD CFO Robert J. Rivet. "We are aggressively addressing the issues that led to our significant revenue decline. We are aligning our business model, capital expenditures and cost structure with the goal of accelerating our return to profitability. Lastly, our customer relationships remain solid, reflecting their confidence in our strategic direction, current and new products, and technology roadmaps."

On a positive note, AMD reported $197 million USD in revenue from its graphics division in Q1 2007. This represented a 19 percent gain from Q4 2006. AMD's next generation DirectX 10-based R600 graphics processor is expected to launch within the next few weeks. The top of the line AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT will feature 320 stream processors, 512-bit memory interface with eight channels, native CrossFire support, 128-bit HDR rendering, 24x anti-aliasing and HDMI output with 5.1 surround sound.

Looking to the near future, AMD plans to get its 65nm native quad-core Barcelona processors out the door during Q3. AMD has high hopes for the processors which will incorporate 2MB of L3 cache and AMD Virtualization (AMD-V) technology. "We expect across a wide variety of workloads for Barcelona to outperform Clovertown by 40 percent," said AMD's corporate vice president for server and workstation products, Randy Allen in January.

The company will not, however, begin production of 45nm processors until the first half of 2008. 45nm processors won’t actually ship until the second half of 2008.

Intel is well aware of AMD's plans and many have suggested that the company released early performance numbers for its quad-core Penryn processors to divert attention away from AMD's upcoming Barcelona. Intel's 45nm Penryn taped-out in January and will begin shipping in the latter half of 2007 -- roughly a year ahead of AMD's first 45nm processor.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: caught sleeping
By Dactyl on 4/19/2007 10:39:29 PM , Rating: 5
When you say "sleeping on the job," you do you perhaps mean "frozen out of the market by Intel's anti-competitive monopoly pricing schemes"? Because that would be more accurate.

Intel sold its chips in a way that prevented major OEMs from selling almost any AMD chips. They had to buy 90% of their chips from Intel or pay much more per chip than the other OEMs (who were all selling 90%+ Intel).

For instance, Dell didn't sell any Opteron servers even while Intel only had Pentium 4-based Xeons. Dell wanted to serve that market, but Intel threatened to stop giving them such a good deal on Intel CPUs if Dell did that.

This froze AMD out of most of the OEM sector. That cost AMD a ton of revenue, which could have gone towards R&D and building new fabs. That's why Barcelona and 65nm have taken so long.

In the meantime, Intel was able to drop the P4 architecture and switch to Core Duo quickly because of their massive R&D budget.

RE: caught sleeping
By nerdye on 4/20/2007 9:17:16 PM , Rating: 2
I agree with all you said, its true that AMD64 should have been selling with major oems in 2003 with its introduction of the opteron64, yet it was Intel's bad ways that kept them from being able to sell their better technology. The 754's were good performers, but the 939 single core, and x2 variants simply embarrassed Intel's offerings at the time of P4 and Pentium D as far as performance, yet never sold a fraction of the amount of units. That was the time for AMD for live it up and soak up the bank, they had a superior platform from A64's release in 2003 all the way to core 2 duo in 2006, yet only gained major OEM support at the end of that reign.

Intel has been selling the crap out of Netburst for 5-6 years now, it was a better cpu than AMD's offerings from time to time with a northwood or two, or a few other cpu's, yet how could P4 reign so long without the business practices Intel has practiced?

Now A64 is the aging cpu architecture and the core2 duo is the performance king that A64 was to P4, perhaps if AMD profited properly from their ace architecture (A64) in the time of its greatness) things would be different now indeed.

"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles
Intel Unveils "Penryn" Performance
April 17, 2007, 9:11 PM
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
ATI Releases More "R600" Details
April 12, 2007, 8:06 PM

Most Popular ArticlesFree Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki