backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 71 comment(s) - last by Jack Ripoff.. on Apr 22 at 12:16 PM


Windows XP Starter Edition localized in Hindi

Intel's "Classmate" PC is a good match for this program

AMD's PIC meets the system requirements, but will run Windows CE or XP Embedded
Student Innovation Suite contains XP Starter Edition, Office Home, and educational software

Microsoft has unveiled an interesting alternative to the OLPC as a solution to developing countries. Rather than providing a new platform and requiring an order of one million units, Microsoft's plan is to offer very low pricing on their popular Windows and Office products -- in fact, the projected price is only three dollars.

Microsoft's program to reach developing countries is known as "Unlimited Potential" and is aiming to double the computing base by 2015 by reaching out to a billion people with low-cost software. In order to qualify for the discounted price, governments will need to provide free PCs for school use.

AMD has a similar program in place called 50x15 that is centered on its Personal Internet Communicator, but Microsoft is not offering its own hardware. Instead, it is expected that Microsoft will leverage the upcoming Intel Classmate PC, which has already stated to run Windows XP.

The $3.00 package includes Windows XP Starter Edition, Microsoft Office 2007 Home and Student Edition, and several other unnamed educational programs. XP Starter Edition differs from the other versions of XP by its rather significant limitations - 800x600 maximum resolution, a maximum of three programs open at once, and "client-only" networking are some of the major caps placed on the cheaper version.

Despite the parallels drawn to the OLPC project, Microsoft isn't trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes. "This is not a philanthropic effort, this is a business," stated Orlando Ayala of Microsoft. In many developing countries, pirated software is sold for pennies on the dollar; but Microsoft seems confident that the program will find favor with governments seeking to promote education programs in their countries.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

AWESOME
By creathir on 4/19/2007 2:40:46 PM , Rating: 1
Now THIS is a true "One laptop per child" project...

Very kind of MS to sell the software for $3.00.... just awesome.

- Creathir




RE: AWESOME
By Griswold on 4/19/2007 2:51:14 PM , Rating: 4
Bullshit. For starters, its just software. Secondly, the potential hardware (Intels classmate for example) is not directly related to this project (and it would be too expensive anyway) and last but not least, MS said it: its business. They are preparing the market - the customers - of tomorrow by teaching them what the brand Microsoft and its products is. Its a clever strategy, not "kind of them".


RE: AWESOME
By v3rt1g0 on 4/19/2007 3:06:37 PM , Rating: 2
Bingo. This is the same reason Apple heavily discounted it's computers to schools years ago. Get them hooked on Macs, and that's what they'll want to buy when they grow up.

Get third world countries using your software off the bat, and once they're actually able to afford mainstream computers and software years down the line, it's likely they will stick to what they already know. That's what Microsoft is betting on anyway.


RE: AWESOME
By creathir on 4/19/2007 3:07:23 PM , Rating: 2
So as long as the OLPC people use Linux, they are not teaching them the brand of Linux?

The entire Intel project, with the MS software, is something I would support a lot faster than a project designed to appease the poor with substandard equipment, but require them to purchase 1,000,000 units.

Also, Intel's distribution model (being created in regions across the world) creates jobs in those areas. Making gobs of OLPCs in China and shipping them about does not have that advantage.

This software that MS is offering as such a reduced price is what will enable a project to succeed. A bunch of hardware is worthless without software to run on it.

- Creathir


RE: AWESOME
By therealnickdanger on 4/19/2007 4:10:23 PM , Rating: 2
Can I mail a medal to you for outstanding post-manship?


RE: AWESOME
By goatfajitas on 4/21/2007 12:57:03 PM , Rating: 2
I 2nd that


RE: AWESOME
By zaki on 4/19/2007 3:03:08 PM , Rating: 1
well since sony gets bashed on everything sony related, here's my opinion.

Microsoft is very good at convincing people that they are the "good" guys. For example you said its "very kind of MS".
Microsoft is a profit mongering company (just like the rest of them) high up execs and board members will cash in on this one way or the other, and thats the only reason why they are doing this.

This is just microsoft's attempt to spread their empire world wide. Well it wont happen, people will still buy pirated software, and there is nothing microsoft can do about it. People who are so poor are more concerned about how to survive let alone that their kids are getting hi-tech computers to educate themselves.

computers are a product, in this case they are being marketed towards people who might not even benefit from owning a quad-core computer.

so thanks microsoft for trying to make more money and helping out poor kids.

i've got a better idea, its called books.


RE: AWESOME
By Mitch101 on 4/19/2007 3:31:12 PM , Rating: 3
Bill Gates is also the largest charitable donator.
Consider some of your money goes to possibly solving cancer.

The next time you take a hot shower realize the person who got the OS for $3.00 probably doesnt have running water you would shower in or more importantly drink.


RE: AWESOME
By zombiexl on 4/19/2007 3:45:56 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
The next time you take a hot shower realize the person who got the OS for $3.00 probably doesnt have running water you would shower in or more importantly drink.


Good point, so why not help them get running water before giving them windows (the OS, not actual windows they might need those too)?


RE: AWESOME
By goatfajitas on 4/21/2007 12:57:56 PM , Rating: 2
MS has software to offer, they do not do plumbing. das why


RE: AWESOME
By AntDX316 on 4/22/2007 9:44:49 AM , Rating: 2
the cost of batteries would cost more than the whole unit


RE: AWESOME
By zaki on 4/19/2007 5:31:30 PM , Rating: 2
the first part of that comment makes sense, however the bit about taking a shower has nothing to do with what is being discussed. In fact it only goes to prove my point that his particular move by microsoft (not bill gates) is entirely an attempt to expand their revenue and profits in the upcoming markets.


RE: AWESOME
By therealnickdanger on 4/19/2007 3:44:15 PM , Rating: 2
I love it when people use the word "empire" to describe democracies or capitalism. "Profit mongering"? I commend you on your desire to read books, but perhaps you should read something else...

Profitable companies are always the most innovative, since they have money to take risks and try new things. Companies that don't advance always fall flat. Without these "profit mongering" companies, we wouldn't have nearly the superb lifestyles we so unwittingly enjoy today. Microsoft already stated that this is a business opportunity, not a donation. By allowing such inexpensive products to be sold in a market in need of a leg up into the world of computing, they are testing out a new market - a potential hotbed of all sorts of fresh ideas AND customers.

quote:
well since sony gets bashed on everything sony related, here's my opinion.

How is this even relevant and who exactly should get bashed on everything Sony related? Should Toshiba get bashed for everything Sony related instead? :\


RE: AWESOME
By Curved on 4/19/2007 4:38:07 PM , Rating: 3
Wrong. Profitable companies are always the most successful. Successful does not mean innovative. Microsoft has historically been a follower; its advantage comes from being able to leverage its resources to productize, not create, an idea.

In fact, after a software company goes public, historically it is rare for it to make any innovations. Instead, it will purchase smaller, more agile, and much more innovative companies. Microsoft is an excellent example of this, but even companies like Apple and now even Google rely on this for their "innovation."

Do you really believe Microsoft was the first company to move into this market? No, they are following a new trend, and they will continue to follow it until they dominate it as has been the case for every one of their new products in the last ten years.


RE: AWESOME
By noirsoft on 4/19/2007 9:48:37 PM , Rating: 2
By your logic, no company is "innovative" -- It is extremely rare for the people who invent a technology to be the ones who profit from it the most. In fact, nearly all scientific and technological innovation relies on iterative improvements to previous inventions. "Standing on the shoulders of giants" et al.

Every company is a follower in some areas, and a leader in others. But, compared to others in a similar space (Apple, Sun, every Linux company) Microsoft is objectively the biggest innovator. Just look at the size and output of Microsoft Research compared to the research of the others.


RE: AWESOME
By therealnickdanger on 4/20/2007 11:19:22 AM , Rating: 2
You said it better than I did. I just assumed that others understand how innovation works.


RE: AWESOME
RE: AWESOME
By noirsoft on 4/22/2007 1:50:57 AM , Rating: 2
Everything in that Anti-Microsoft rant of a webpage can be said about any other computer company, with only the names and details changed.

quote:

Name one, just one, major piece of useful technology that's ostensibly been invented or developed by Microsoft. One single original concept, that's all I ask. Name it, and I'll tell you where they got it from.


Replace "Microsoft" with any other company in that sentence. It's just as true. Inventing a new concept is the easy part. Making it into a viable product is much much harder, and there Microsoft excels. (ouch, No Pun Intended)


RE: AWESOME
By Jack Ripoff on 4/22/2007 12:16:44 PM , Rating: 2
I doubt other computer companies like, say, Red Hat, MySQL or Apple have founded a global monopoly (which, btw, is a big barrier to innovation itself) based on a stolen product.

That's why Microsoft sells software for $3 today. Because they've already got enough money, their real goal is dominating the whole market to limit the user's freedom of choice by not respecting established standards.

If every other computer company behaves the same doubtful way, then there's something wrong with the system itself (capitalism) and I don't wanna believe that...


RE: AWESOME
By zaki on 4/19/2007 5:38:58 PM , Rating: 2
with the percent of the market that microsoft holds, I think I'm more than justified in calling it an empire.

I do not condemn profit mongering, but I felt the need to use those words for people to see this move for what it is.

I dont agree with your theory of profitable companies being the most innovative. the two things may arise from one another but are not dependent on the other.

the part about sony bashing is to give microsoft fanboys an idea of how annoying it is when they feel the need to make sony look bad in any news about them. you did not understand what i wrote. perhaps i should have written: since sony gets bashed for everything they do....


pfffffffffffffffffff
By Hyperlite on 4/19/2007 3:05:12 PM , Rating: 2
they should be giving it to them for free.




RE: pfffffffffffffffffff
By tungtung on 4/19/2007 3:36:27 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed ... not to mention in some countries $3 can mean a whole day (or even week) worth of salary. I mean if you read the "features" this $3 software has ... its apalling ... as said in one of the comment above, in some of these countries, you can actually get a full version (albeit pirated) version of the software for cheaper anyway.

I honestly don't see this "cheap" software going anywhere.


RE: pfffffffffffffffffff
By Psychless on 4/22/2007 9:49:17 AM , Rating: 2
Like mentioned in the article, Microsoft isn't doing this just to be "good". They're doing it to make money and giving it away for free will not accomplish this. Anyways, most people in developing countries aren't going to care about "cheap" laptops when they're starving or homeless. I really don't think this product will succeed but it will definitely introduce more people to the wonderful world of Microsoft...


I still would never buy it
By kmmatney on 4/19/2007 4:49:42 PM , Rating: 3
Even if I could go to a store and buy this for $3, I wouldn't - due to the 800 x 600 restriction, and only 3 programs opened at once.




RE: I still would never buy it
By noirsoft on 4/22/2007 1:53:43 AM , Rating: 2
The fact that you already have access to post on the internet shows that you are not the target market for this.


Disturbingly close to the BBC story
By JackTheLad on 4/19/2007 8:17:25 PM , Rating: 2
You hardly even bothered to re-write it. Same quotes and everything.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6571139.stm

Do you pay them royalties?




By James Holden on 4/19/2007 8:38:17 PM , Rating: 2
It's a press release dude. Everybody is using the same quotes.


$3.00 I want my $3.00
By Mitch101 on 4/20/2007 10:11:40 AM , Rating: 2
$3.00 I want my $3.00. Does the paperboy collect for them?

If you dont understand rent "Better Off Dead"




RE: $3.00 I want my $3.00
By noirsoft on 4/22/2007 1:52:32 AM , Rating: 2
The original quote was two dollars, I beleive.

I'm guessing you're taking inflation into account?


got Brown?
By codeThug on 4/19/2007 4:13:44 PM , Rating: 2
$3.00 for the code. $287.00 for shipping.

That's how Microsoft will sell it on Ebay...




OLPC
By eman 7613 on 4/19/2007 6:09:19 PM , Rating: 2
The artical mentions it but forgets to remind everyone waht olpc is! you pay $100 (that was the target i dont know what he actuall amount is) And you get a rugged laptop designed to be used in most enviroments, that runs linux and comes with everything youd need pre installed. And since these are develping nations were power may be unreliable when there at all, it has a hancrank so if you want/need to use it you still can. Now, what works better.

M$ pay us 3 bucks for each peice of software, oh and dont forget to buy computers first and they have to be used in schools! Oh by the way youll need some fairly expensive machines to be able to run vista so pay up.

or

Here is the computer, with everything on it, all set up, use it where you need it.




Theres a word for that
By senbassador on 4/20/2007 2:05:54 AM , Rating: 2
And most economists call it "price discrimination".

Here, MS gets to maximize profits without creating any deadweight loss. A very common business practice.




also included
By jonnybnimble on 4/20/2007 10:29:34 AM , Rating: 2
blizzard should hop on the bandwagon and offer warcraft 3... or 2 or whatever would work for super cheap... then when they can afford microsoft products they can blow all their dough instead on WOW instead




haha
By penumbra on 4/21/2007 3:51:03 PM , Rating: 2
the funny thing is that i bought my windows XP professional CD for just RS 30 here in my country of PAKISTAN.

that converts to 0.5$.

whole of southasia runs on piracy.

and no ms can't stop us from getting the full fledged softwares.

MY windows updates as normal...runs as normal.

PIRACY rules.

This 3$ bullcrap won't simply work period




Screw windows
By Jcruiser89 on 4/21/2007 4:06:45 PM , Rating: 2
http://laptop.org/

Thats all i got to say




Another Alternative
By Curved on 4/19/2007 4:25:27 PM , Rating: 1
Foreign governments could always just sanction using cracked versions of Microsoft software, and then all the kiddies could have vista ultimate instead. Don't you think that paying less for a newer version makes sense? :P




Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By MrPickins on 4/19/2007 2:40:59 PM , Rating: 5
It's a little bit of both, apparently.

MS makes money, and 3rd world students get good, legitimate software for a price their governments can afford.

I say good for them.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Jack Ripoff on 4/19/2007 6:48:17 PM , Rating: 2
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By MrPickins on 4/20/2007 10:30:34 AM , Rating: 2
I agree somewhat with that article, but I don't see what the big deal is. It makes good business sense for MS.

If Linux is ready to compete, then this shouldn't affect it's market share too much. IMO, though, linux isn't ready to be a mainstream desktop os.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By m104 on 4/19/2007 8:25:52 PM , Rating: 2
ye... I agree


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By creathir on 4/19/2007 2:41:52 PM , Rating: 5
It would be, if you were FORCED to buy MS software. You are not. Linux is out there, as is Apple, both are well created alternatives. Personally, I prefer Microsoft software, but alternatives do exist.

- Creathir


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Nekrik on 4/19/2007 2:54:28 PM , Rating: 5
I'm pretty sure you were not forced to buy that laptop, so you were not forced to buy Vista, it was your choice. Don't want it, buy something else.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Jason04CV on 4/19/2007 5:02:48 PM , Rating: 3
You either accept the terms of your purchase or you don't. You accepted the terms. While Vista was bundled with your notebook, you are free to use whatever free or commercial alternative you want. Be grateful for how far things have come. :) When you buy a new car, will you complain about it coming with stuff like a certain engine, steering wheel, radio, brake system, or AC?


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By PrezWeezy on 4/19/2007 5:31:44 PM , Rating: 2
Actually what they are saying is that this will stop piracy, which in turn means Microsoft is loosing far less money on the software that is out there anyway. If you had your choice of loosing money, or just not making money, well it's a pretty clear cut choice.

There are lots of places you can get XP on your laptop, Dell will do it until June, I think IBM is still selling XP, I don't know about Sony, HP or Toshiba, but there are some out there. You were therefor not forced.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By therealnickdanger on 4/19/2007 3:04:26 PM , Rating: 2
You could have bought a Mac or a laptop preconfigured with Linux. You could also uninstall Vista and install Linux if you like. That's like saying "when I bought my new laptop, I was FORCED to buy a wi-fi adapter". There are alternatives and choices out there. You can buy tons of computers with no OS loaded as well. You can buy barebones and choose parts and software to install. You CHOSE to buy a laptop with Vista on it. They aren't even seperate at that point, really. It's like getting 512MB, 1GB, or 2GB, you make choices based on what you want.

If you want to use XP Starter, I'm sure you can find it somewhere to purchase. The market will pay what the market will bear; and these destitute populations can't afford much. Microsoft is a business because, and only because, we all choose to use and buy their products.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By RW on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: 0
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By swtethan on 4/19/2007 3:58:41 PM , Rating: 2
You are not forced to buy windows, go buy a DELL WITHOUT Windows, those are available you know? OR buy a barebone laptop.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: 0
By therealnickdanger on 4/19/2007 4:08:20 PM , Rating: 2
I'll sell you my Dell that came with Windows, but I'll keep the license if it makes you feel better:
http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/sys/311014941.ht...


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By RW on 4/19/07, Rating: -1
By therealnickdanger on 4/19/2007 4:06:12 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
My point (although not explained very well) was that MS is charging home/business users a huge premium and then trying to look like the good guy by giving away this software soo cheap.

You can explain your hypothesis as well as you want, it still won't be accurate. You are complaining about a company that offers you world-leading operability and compatibility for less than the competition (admittedly), all because they are selling an ultra-stripped version of a 5-year old operating system to poor countries.

Microsoft is charging nearly what they always charge for their products - Vista Ultimate being the exception. Would you rather MS sell Vista for $50 and not offer a $3 XPS OS? How would you run Microsoft? Whether you want to admit it or not, that's not your right to decide. If that makes you mad, I suggest you get over it, because it's not going to change any time soon. What you can choose is whether or not to use Microsoft products.

"This is not a philanthropic effort, this is a business ," stated Orlando Ayala of Microsoft.
Well said, Mr. Ayala.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Verran on 4/19/2007 3:04:57 PM , Rating: 2
How is this redistribution of wealth? They're offering a product. If it's not fair, don't buy it. That's just as applicable to the $400 Vista Ultimate as it is to the $3 Skeletal-XP. And the fact that you would compare Vista Ultimate to this super-gimped version of an old OS just shows how much you've missed the point.

The PS3 costs $850 in Europe, but only $600 here in the states. I guess Sony believes in "redistribution of wealth" too.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/2007 3:07:34 PM , Rating: 1
Actually things are always more expensive in europe due to them taking everything to hell.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: 0
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Furen on 4/19/2007 7:05:47 PM , Rating: 2
This SKU is not going to be sold at a loss, the point of offering it is to have people who usually pirate the OS buy it, it'll actually create a new revenue stream for Microsoft and, because development costs for this new revenue is pretty insignificant, MS will basically be getting pure profit(the software already exists, you just need to cripple it enough, which should be cheap enough).

You could lower the price of the software for all your paying customers, yes, but then you lose profits for no good reason (other than having the goodwill of your customer base which, in MS's case, is not needed).


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Googer on 4/19/2007 2:51:30 PM , Rating: 2
Look at the alternative: $3 sure beats piracy, getting something out of them surely is better than getting nothing at all.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zaki on 4/19/2007 3:04:15 PM , Rating: 2
nobody would buy this when they can buy windows vista ultimate for $2, thats value right there.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/07, Rating: 0
RE: Is this software or welfare?
By ninjit on 4/19/2007 3:20:30 PM , Rating: 2
You're not thinking of this from their business standpoint.

These developing countries are growing, and whose software are they going to use when the kids are in the workplace?
If linux is all they use in school because that's all that could be afforded, then that is likely what they'll use in business too.

MS understands that and wants them hooked on windows as early as possible.

Its pretty much the same reasoning behind educational discounts we get in college - the companies want use to be comfortable with their products by the time we graduate so that's what we'll want to use later on too.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By zombiexl on 4/19/2007 3:26:38 PM , Rating: 1
Honestly though what % of the kids in developing nations do you think will be buying the product when they get older?

To me it seems like a waste of a product. Now they have to support it in someway. If it pays off more power to them, although I somehow doubt this is going to buy them many future customers.

You mention student discounts. Why not offer larger student discounts in a nation where people are mor elikely to continue to buy the software? Most students I've known are pretty broke.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Lakku on 4/19/2007 4:33:37 PM , Rating: 2
Broke, maybe. But I just picked up Office 2007 Enterprise edition on a DVD for 29 bucks. That's normally a 600 to 900 dollar set of software. Also, next month, I will be picking up Vista Ultimate for the same price as well, not an upgrade version, but a full version. I think student discounts are pretty damn good, considering I will pay 60 bucks for two DVDs that would value at around 1000 or more if bought at retail. How much more of a discount do you want?


By killerroach on 4/19/2007 4:29:21 PM , Rating: 4
You apparently aren't familiar with microeconomics, and the pricing system taken by a monopolist.

Monopolies (which, since Microsoft is the only company that makes Windows, they are in the Windows-compatible OS market, even if the DoJ doesn't consider the company as a whole as such anymore) are not price takers, like a perfectly competitive business is, but rather a price maker, and they, as such, will price their product so as to maximize profits. However, the profit-maximizing quantity for a monopoly is less than what would be produced in a competitive market (by definition of how cost and revenue curves interact), so the price a monopolist makes drives some purchasers out of the market to look for alternatives (or, in the case of software, piracy). This ends up creating a dead-weight loss within the economic system, which reduces overall social benefit for both the consumer and the producer.

To offset this, some will try to engage in price discrimination, or a system in which the price the monopoly charges is partially related to a customer's willingness to pay. Hence why Microsoft has multiple versions of Windows, various prices in different countries, academic discounts, corporate volume discounts, different pricing structures in the server and HPC market, and so on. In the developing world, the willingness to pay is extremely low in relation to, say, the United States (since they don't have the money to pay), but, since Microsoft deems the amount they are willing to pay (in this case, $3) to be greater than the cost for them to provide them the product (marginal costs of software are minimal, printing discs is a negligible issue in terms of price), they are willing to provide them the good. As a result, the third world has their software (and legally to boot!), Microsoft gets their sales, and they net a profit in the long run.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Kefner on 4/19/2007 4:59:30 PM , Rating: 2
Vista Ultimate is the top version of a NEW operating system. Three dollars a piece for a purchase on a 6 year old stripped down OS, I don't see the problem. Your comparing apples and oranges. Now, I am not defending the 400 bucks, cause it is extremely high, but I am not going to bad mouth them for helping out a third world country trying to help their people get an education. Plus 3 dollars over there is still probably more then the 100 or so you would pay for a fully functional version of XP Home here in the US? So a US college kid has to give up a weekend of drinking to afford to buy his XP, big deal. In some parts of the world, that 3 bucks is a week's, if not a month's, salary. If MS is going to go over there and sell it for 50% of what you pay in the US, it won't even be worth the time to deal with it, cause its not going to sell. And if they sell a few million license's, that will take care of any costs associated with stripping down XP, and give them a future customer base, as some of the countries emerge out of Third World status. May take many, many years, but companies like MS look years and decades down the road.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By 16nm on 4/19/2007 5:53:50 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In some parts of the world, that 3 bucks is a week's, if not a month's, salary. If MS is going to go over there and sell it for 50% of what you pay in the US, it won't even be worth the time to deal with it, cause its not going to sell.


Now MS just needs to come up with a $3 PC and it will all make sense.


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By Kefner on 4/20/2007 3:47:55 PM , Rating: 2
How about a 3 dollar Xbox! :)


RE: Is this software or welfare?
By penumbra on 4/21/2007 3:52:34 PM , Rating: 2
the funny thing is that i bought my windows XP professional CD for just RS 30 here in my country of PAKISTAN.

that converts to 0.5$.

whole of southasia runs on piracy.

and no ms can't stop us from getting the full fledged softwares.

MY windows updates as normal...runs as normal.

PIRACY rules.

This 3$ bullcrap won't simply work period


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki