Print 26 comment(s) - last by BigPeen.. on Mar 31 at 2:02 PM

Version 1.2 of Apple's identity-crisis software now supports the 32-bit versions of Microsoft's latest OS

Owners of Intel-based Macs can now join their PC brethern in rejoicing - or demeaning - Microsoft's latest Windows operating system, Vista. With the release of Boot Camp beta 1.2, Apple has added support for the 32-bit versions of Vista.

While some enterprising souls have managed to install Vista release candidates on their Intel-based Macs prior to this point, Vista's installer and EFI-aware boot code caused its share of problems, and drivers were not fully functional. Boot Camp 1.2 fixes these installation bugs, and adds a nearly full compliment of drivers. Audio, video, input and communication devices are all supported, but the Sudden Motion Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, and S-Video functionality are still absent, so SmackBook fans will have to restrict their technology abuse to OSX.

In addition to the 32-bit restriction, upgrades or multi-disc versions of Vista are not supported. There have been some spotty reports of success with an installation of Windows XP followed by an in-place upgrade to Vista, but Apple makes no mention of this on their websites.

Boot Camp 1.2 is a 138MB download, and is freely available to any Mac owner running OS 10.4.6 or later with 10GB of free drive space, a supported Windows XP or Vista install media, and a desire to make hardcore Apple zealots squirm a little when they see a Start button on their LCD.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By dagamer34 on 3/30/2007 2:28:46 AM , Rating: 4
Because someone is more likely to buy a Mac if they know they can run Windows any time they want to. No matter what world you live in, sooner or later you'll need to run a Windows app.

RE: SImple
By Ralph The Magician on 3/30/2007 10:33:29 AM , Rating: 3
But that's not what Boot Camp is really about. Boot Camp is about gaming. If you want to run Windows you are better off getting a copy of Parallels and running it from within OS X.

Rebooting to switch between operating system is a pain in the ass if you just need to run a Windows application. For gaming though, it doesn't really matter.

RE: SImple
By osalcido on 3/30/2007 1:16:47 PM , Rating: 2
umm arent games considered to be windows applications, too? Whats the difference?

RE: SImple
By gradoman on 3/30/2007 1:27:05 PM , Rating: 2
The overhead cost of running a virtual machine, I guess..


RE: SImple
By vortmax on 3/30/2007 1:33:06 PM , Rating: 2
I've run both and Parallel's, while neat and convenient, has a bunch of bugs along with various usability issues. It's good enough for a Mac user to occassionally use Windows, but definitely not the other way around...Boot Camp is much better for that.

"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki