backtop


Print 4 comment(s) - last by Russell.. on Mar 26 at 12:44 PM

While Intel did not validate combinations of Bearlake chipsets with Netburst-based CPUs, the chances that they still work are not that bad

This article was first published in German on K-Hardware.de.

During CeBIT, the internet was amok with several claims that CPUs based on Intel's Netburst microarchitecture may not support the upcomming 3-series chipsets codenamed Bearlake

Intels Steve Peterson, Director Chipset & Software Marketing, stated "[the] 3-series chipsets have been designed and optimized for Core microarchitecture based CPUs."

Since Intel wants transition its whole CPU-lineup to Core microarchitecture by the end of Q2, the Bearlake-chipsets are designed to match up with those CPUs. As a result, Intel only validated these 3-series chipsets with Core-based CPUs.

However, there is still a chance to make this combination work, as Intel is not aware of any specific incompatibilities between 3-series chipsets and Netburst-based CPUs. To clarify, Intel simply didn't validate this combination and thus cannot officially support it -- at least that's what the corporate brass is stating.

Peterson added, "Although, we are not aware of any incompatibilities with Intel’s Netburst Microarchitecture based CPUs when used with Bearlake chipsets, we have not validated this combination and our design guidelines restrict the Bearlake family boot function to Core Microarchitecture and beyond … Some customers may not follow all of our guidelines and may allow for the Netburst Microarchitecture based CPUs to boot and run. In this case, the OEM would guarantee the reliability associated with this unvalidated combination."

In a nutshell, Intel design guidelines restrict the boot function of the Bearlake family to Core microarchitecture CPUs and future models. However, OEMs can implement boot-code for Netburst-CPUs and support them on their behalf.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: :roll eyes:
By Russell on 3/26/2007 12:44:22 PM , Rating: 3
I don't see why people are as concerned as they are with the longevity of platforms. To support the next greatest thing you always need a new chipset, ie: a new motherboard, anyways. So who cares if your Bearlake board is socket 775 or socket 32143. Same thing with Socket A. Sure, it was long lived, but who cares. They may as well have changed it because you always needed a new one anyways.

The only thing its good for is using old CPU's with the new motherboards, and in this case Intel is trying to close that door on us. Not that I mind.


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Related Articles



Latest By Marcus Pollice
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
Intel Readies Merom-L Core
April 7, 2007, 9:16 PM
NVIDIA Holds Back "G84, G86" Cards
March 23, 2007, 7:08 PM
CeBIT 2007: GeForce 8600 Spotted
March 14, 2007, 1:19 PM
NVIDIA Not Present CeBIT
February 25, 2007, 7:36 PM
NVIDIA's Current Driver Mess
February 12, 2007, 7:32 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki