backtop


Print 4 comment(s) - last by Russell.. on Mar 26 at 12:44 PM

While Intel did not validate combinations of Bearlake chipsets with Netburst-based CPUs, the chances that they still work are not that bad

This article was first published in German on K-Hardware.de.

During CeBIT, the internet was amok with several claims that CPUs based on Intel's Netburst microarchitecture may not support the upcomming 3-series chipsets codenamed Bearlake

Intels Steve Peterson, Director Chipset & Software Marketing, stated "[the] 3-series chipsets have been designed and optimized for Core microarchitecture based CPUs."

Since Intel wants transition its whole CPU-lineup to Core microarchitecture by the end of Q2, the Bearlake-chipsets are designed to match up with those CPUs. As a result, Intel only validated these 3-series chipsets with Core-based CPUs.

However, there is still a chance to make this combination work, as Intel is not aware of any specific incompatibilities between 3-series chipsets and Netburst-based CPUs. To clarify, Intel simply didn't validate this combination and thus cannot officially support it -- at least that's what the corporate brass is stating.

Peterson added, "Although, we are not aware of any incompatibilities with Intel’s Netburst Microarchitecture based CPUs when used with Bearlake chipsets, we have not validated this combination and our design guidelines restrict the Bearlake family boot function to Core Microarchitecture and beyond … Some customers may not follow all of our guidelines and may allow for the Netburst Microarchitecture based CPUs to boot and run. In this case, the OEM would guarantee the reliability associated with this unvalidated combination."

In a nutshell, Intel design guidelines restrict the boot function of the Bearlake family to Core microarchitecture CPUs and future models. However, OEMs can implement boot-code for Netburst-CPUs and support them on their behalf.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What's the point?
By oTAL on 3/26/2007 7:08:43 AM , Rating: 2
Who the hell would want to do this?
There's only one scenario I can possibly think of... upgrading...
But who would spend top dollar on a MB while keeping a NetBurst processor? Might as well change the processor alone and use the electricity savings to buy the MB, after a few months.




RE: What's the point?
By gramboh on 3/26/2007 11:38:12 AM , Rating: 3
I agree. Could it have to do with some type of Xeon chips that people are still using in server applications maybe?

There is no logical reason you would care about Netburst in Bearlake as an end-user. Maybe system integraters (Dell/HP) want to sell crappy old inventory in new mainboards, although I have no idea why.

All the new chips are Core based correct? Even the new 'Pentium' branded CPU coming out in Q3?


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

Related Articles



Latest By Marcus Pollice
AMD Talks Details on K10
April 14, 2007, 11:46 AM
Intel Readies Merom-L Core
April 7, 2007, 9:16 PM
NVIDIA Holds Back "G84, G86" Cards
March 23, 2007, 7:08 PM
CeBIT 2007: GeForce 8600 Spotted
March 14, 2007, 1:19 PM
NVIDIA Not Present CeBIT
February 25, 2007, 7:36 PM
NVIDIA's Current Driver Mess
February 12, 2007, 7:32 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki