backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by drex3.. on Mar 23 at 7:03 AM


Samsung Q1 Ultra

Asus T83 -- image courtesy Engadget
Microsoft's UMPC platform is a year old, but how far has it come?

Just over a year ago, Microsoft hailed its UMPC platform as the next step in mobile computing. The premise was sound: provide a full Windows-based operating system in a hand-held form-factor that would slot in between a traditional PDA and a notebook computer.

"We believe that (ultra-mobile PCs) will eventually become as indispensable and ubiquitous as the mobile phone today," said Microsoft VP Bill Mitchell when the platform was first launched.

Despite the initial hype, the first generation UMPCs didn't quite make the splash in the marketplace that Microsoft had once hoped for. Samsung says that its UMPC sales have failed to meet expectations and that it sold less than 100,000 of its Q1 during 2006 -- the company hopes to sell 300,000 units in 2007.

There are a number of key reasons why the platform has floundered thus far: High price of entry, high system weight, meager system/video performance and poor battery life. Until these issues are addressed, sales may never take off for the platform.

Samsung is addressing three of the four above issues with its Q1 Ultra. Samsung has managed to lower the weight of its UMPC from 1.7 pounds for the Q1 to 1.5 pounds for the Q1 Ultra. The Q1 offers an 800MHz Core 2-based processor and Intel's 965 chipset to boost overall system performance. And lastly, battery life has been boosted from roughly 2.5 hours to 3.5 hours (6 hours with the extended battery pack).

Samsung still hasn't addressed the issue of pricing, however. The Q1 Ultra is expected to retail for around $1,200 USD when it is released. That's still a far cry from the low of $599 that Microsoft envisioned when it created the UMPC sector and is roughly the same price as a first generation Q1 with a 1.0GHz Pentium M 723 processor.

Acer is less than optimistic about the current state of affairs with the UMPC platform. As it stands, the company is still taking a "wait and see" approach to the platform.

"If you think about the ultramobile PC, you need first of all battery life that is like a telephone. with a telephone, you have 12 or 15 hours of battery life without a problem," said Acer president Gianfranco Lanci. "We need to wait another 18 months or 24 months before this is ready," he said.

Lanci also points to the subpar graphics available with most UMPCs. "You have very good graphics on the notebooks, but you also need very good graphics on the ultramobile PC."

Finally, Lanci points to the need for inexpensive 3G connectivity options. The Samsung Q1 Ultra throws not only WiFi and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR at the user, but also WiBRO (the mobile version of WiMAX) and HSDPA connectivity. "[3G and WiMAX] must be available, but at an affordable price, otherwise people won't use it."

The next few months should be rather interesting as we are sure to see more second generation devices announced. So far it seems that UMPCs have taken one step forward with the Samsung Q1 Ultra and one step backward with the new Asus T83 UMPC, which looks more like a miniature Tablet PC than a UMPC. The T83 in most respects is not as evolved as its R2H predecessor: Asus managed to launch a device that is larger, heavier, slower and has less features than the device that proceeded it.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Smartphones are killing UMPC
By encryptkeeper on 3/21/2007 9:51:40 AM , Rating: 2
Who the hell wants something less powerful than a laptop (or tablet) and more powerful than a smartphone (but doesn't have the fucking ability to CALL SOMEONE). Companies need to just stop trying to develop UMPCs as it's just going to cost them money. Smartphones really are the way to go. My buddy has one and I'd choose that over a UMPC. Price is another thing killing these things. People would rather spend that 1200 on a laptop that is slightly larger and more powerful than a UMPC.




By Brandon Hill (blog) on 3/21/2007 10:05:39 AM , Rating: 2
To be fair, I would fall into this category. I'm one that has a general distaste for smartphones. I prefer my phones small and lightweight so that it fits in my pocket without weighing me down. I can do without the small 3.5" screen and subpar "imitation" Office applications.

I prefer my phone to be a phone...not a do it all device.

As for UMPCs, the form-factor appeals greatly to me, but the price just needs to come down. I currently have a 14" notebook, but it is loud, heavy and hot. It cost me $1,300 and has a 2.0GHz C2D processor, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD and a Radeon X1700.

I bought it to be "futureproof" for the next year and a half or so, but to tell you the truth, I can do without the extra power. With my daily Windows Vista work load, the processor runs at 1GHz 95% of the time and I don't even game with my Radeon X1700.

Carrying it around to trade shows along with a D-SLR camera can get a bit tiring as well. Having a smaller sub 2-pound device that has full Windows compatibility while being relatively cool, quiet and capable is very appealing.

Now if they could just work on the pricing...


“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs

Related Articles
Samsung's Q1 Ultra En Route
March 15, 2007, 11:40 AM
Samsung's UMPC Gets Solid-State Storage
September 25, 2006, 11:45 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki