Print 31 comment(s) - last by typo101.. on Mar 13 at 5:56 PM

Intel's NAND-based solid state drive
Intel enters the storage market with a solid offering

Intel Corporation announced today its entry into solid state drives with the Intel Z-U130. Aimed at delivering performance and value, the drives are based on NAND flash memory with standard USB 2.0/1.1 interfaces. Intel says that the advantages of its Z-U130 over hard disk drives and removable USB storage devices are faster boot times, embedded code storage, rapid data access and low-power storage alternatives.

Solid state drives enjoy several advantages over traditional hard disk drives, such as faster start-up, faster read times, lower seek times, less power consumption, silent operation and lower weight. Solid state drives should also be more reliable as there are no moving parts involved in the device’s operation. On the flip side, magnetic-based drives may endure better after a great number of read/write cycles and faster write times. For the foreseeable future, traditional hard disk drives will also enjoy the cost advantage at large capacities.

“Solid state drive technology offers many benefits over traditional hard disk drives including improved performance and reliability,” said Randy Wilhelm, vice president and general manager of Intel’s NAND Products Group. “The Intel solid state drive technology provides robust performance, while offering Intel’s industry leading quality, validation and reliability for a wide variety of embedded applications.”

The Z-U130 product comes in 1GB, 2GB, 4GB and 8GB densities. The 1GB and 2GB versions are already in production, with the 4GB to be added in April. The top-end 8GB drive isn’t slated for production until December.

With reads of 28MB per second and write speeds of 20 MB per second, the solid state drive is a storage alternative for common PC or embedded application operations such as locating boot code, operating systems and commonly accessed libraries. Other future applications of the technology include video game consoles and handheld systems.

Intel is positioning its solid state drives as a hard disk drive replacement technology for emerging market notebooks and low-cost, fully featured PCs and other embedded systems. Current price projections place Intel’s 4GB value SSD on par with 1.8-inch HDDs, but Intel expects costs to fall as it ramps up volume production. Intel predicts that its 4GB product will be priced below comparable 1.8-inch drives by the second half of this year, with it surpassing 2.5-inch drives by 2008. By 2009, Intel believes that its 8GB SSD will cost less than any comparable 1.8-inch or 2.5-inch HDD.

While Intel is labeling its Z-U130 as a value-oriented product, several solutions would receive a performance enhancement with the use of a SSD for system booting. Servers could start up faster if its boot information were stored on flash-based memory. In addition, it will be used in Intel embedded solutions for routers and point of sale terminals, which would also benefit from the faster system boots.

The product can be easily integrated into original manufacturers’ designs because of its USB 2.0 and 1.1 compliant interfaces, 2x5 USB connector and standard single-level cell NAND in thin small outline package (TSOP) devices. The company is also considering next-generation products that could incorporate cost-effective multi-level cell (MLC) technology.

Intel plans to distinguish its product from other solid state offerings with extensive validation, including more than 1,000 hours of accelerated reliability testing, and is expecting to meet an average mean time between failure specification of five million hours.

Other makers of solid state drives include ASUS, Fujitsu, Samsung, Adtron, SanDisk and Ritek. Last week, an analyst pegged Apple to soon be using solid state drive technology in the next generation of MacBooks. It looks like solid state drives are ready for prime time.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

LOL, USB stick without plastic casing...
By mino on 3/12/2007 11:25:00 AM , Rating: 2
The moment I saw "USB" I knew it is just a pure PR.
No offence Intel, but USB is too slow (esp. for random access) and unreliable for main storage.

Servers? fast startup? ROFL.
Many IBM mainframes(the holy grail of a "server") may take tens of minutes to start ... to stop only for dismantling, of course ;)

Seems author had Windows in mind...

Put it on IDE/SATA/eSATA(or IEE1394b) and we may talk.

By JackPack on 3/12/2007 1:09:40 PM , Rating: 2
Notice the word "value"?

This is the first product out of the Micron-Intel joint venture.

By PandaBear on 3/12/2007 2:38:07 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. How is USB a replacement for HD? Wouldn't this be just yet another USB drive instead?

If it is a SATA with small capacity, it will be a good boot drive for server to save space on the rack. Seriously, rack mount server's boot drive doesn't need high performance or write cycle, just something to boot up and save the room for another real hard drive, thats the way to go.

RE: LOL, USB stick without plastic casing...
By TomZ on 3/12/07, Rating: -1
By peternelson on 3/12/2007 9:48:22 PM , Rating: 2
USB has far too much protocol overhead for this kind of application, and it also hogs cpu and bus time when transferring a lot of traffic because of this, even with a good usb host adaptor.

I agree with mino SATA and/or ESATA would be much better.

I could beat the speed of this using a Sandisk compact flash module. I can stick that on a CF to IDE adaptor and the speeds will beat this. If I want SATA host connections I can put a SATA/PATA adaptor in there too. Those adaptors could be fixed onto a rival module if designed. Better yet would be the memory with native SATA connection.

RE: LOL, USB stick without plastic casing...
By crystal clear on 3/13/2007 2:03:15 AM , Rating: 1
For servers-"real high priority "

"to improve system responiveness-enables users to avoid the hundres of annoying multi second delays they experience everyday when moving within and between frequently used applications."

By TomZ on 3/13/2007 11:21:04 AM , Rating: 1
That problem is already solved with Vista's SuperFetch, which uses available DRAM instead. Preloading in DRAM will be much faster than preloading in Flash.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Related Articles
Adtron Announces 160GB Solid-state Drive
February 25, 2007, 5:40 PM
16GB RiDATA Flash SSD to Start at $265
January 10, 2007, 4:31 AM
SanDisk Unveils 1.8" 32GB Flash SSD Drive
January 4, 2007, 12:00 PM
Solid-state Drives Ready for Prime Time
November 15, 2006, 3:45 PM
Hands On with Asustek's R2H UMPC
October 30, 2006, 9:10 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki