Print 31 comment(s) - last by typo101.. on Mar 13 at 5:56 PM

Intel's NAND-based solid state drive
Intel enters the storage market with a solid offering

Intel Corporation announced today its entry into solid state drives with the Intel Z-U130. Aimed at delivering performance and value, the drives are based on NAND flash memory with standard USB 2.0/1.1 interfaces. Intel says that the advantages of its Z-U130 over hard disk drives and removable USB storage devices are faster boot times, embedded code storage, rapid data access and low-power storage alternatives.

Solid state drives enjoy several advantages over traditional hard disk drives, such as faster start-up, faster read times, lower seek times, less power consumption, silent operation and lower weight. Solid state drives should also be more reliable as there are no moving parts involved in the device’s operation. On the flip side, magnetic-based drives may endure better after a great number of read/write cycles and faster write times. For the foreseeable future, traditional hard disk drives will also enjoy the cost advantage at large capacities.

“Solid state drive technology offers many benefits over traditional hard disk drives including improved performance and reliability,” said Randy Wilhelm, vice president and general manager of Intel’s NAND Products Group. “The Intel solid state drive technology provides robust performance, while offering Intel’s industry leading quality, validation and reliability for a wide variety of embedded applications.”

The Z-U130 product comes in 1GB, 2GB, 4GB and 8GB densities. The 1GB and 2GB versions are already in production, with the 4GB to be added in April. The top-end 8GB drive isn’t slated for production until December.

With reads of 28MB per second and write speeds of 20 MB per second, the solid state drive is a storage alternative for common PC or embedded application operations such as locating boot code, operating systems and commonly accessed libraries. Other future applications of the technology include video game consoles and handheld systems.

Intel is positioning its solid state drives as a hard disk drive replacement technology for emerging market notebooks and low-cost, fully featured PCs and other embedded systems. Current price projections place Intel’s 4GB value SSD on par with 1.8-inch HDDs, but Intel expects costs to fall as it ramps up volume production. Intel predicts that its 4GB product will be priced below comparable 1.8-inch drives by the second half of this year, with it surpassing 2.5-inch drives by 2008. By 2009, Intel believes that its 8GB SSD will cost less than any comparable 1.8-inch or 2.5-inch HDD.

While Intel is labeling its Z-U130 as a value-oriented product, several solutions would receive a performance enhancement with the use of a SSD for system booting. Servers could start up faster if its boot information were stored on flash-based memory. In addition, it will be used in Intel embedded solutions for routers and point of sale terminals, which would also benefit from the faster system boots.

The product can be easily integrated into original manufacturers’ designs because of its USB 2.0 and 1.1 compliant interfaces, 2x5 USB connector and standard single-level cell NAND in thin small outline package (TSOP) devices. The company is also considering next-generation products that could incorporate cost-effective multi-level cell (MLC) technology.

Intel plans to distinguish its product from other solid state offerings with extensive validation, including more than 1,000 hours of accelerated reliability testing, and is expecting to meet an average mean time between failure specification of five million hours.

Other makers of solid state drives include ASUS, Fujitsu, Samsung, Adtron, SanDisk and Ritek. Last week, an analyst pegged Apple to soon be using solid state drive technology in the next generation of MacBooks. It looks like solid state drives are ready for prime time.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By shabby on 3/12/2007 6:07:45 AM , Rating: 2
Those read/write speeds arent exactly spectacular, in fact i think some usb drives can read/write at those same speeds and are available now for pretty cheap.

RE: umm....
By Hypernova on 3/12/2007 6:28:05 AM , Rating: 2
While the stream speed may not be that great (my own laptop's can get to 35MB/s) the strength is in the random seeks.

Capacity is still too small though, this is only good for embedded or thin clients IMO. If you put it in an ultra portable there's only just enough space to squeeze in MS office after the OS.

RE: umm....
By semo on 3/12/2007 6:51:46 AM , Rating: 2
the op was referring to other flash based mass storage devices, not hdds. i think the corsair voyager gt has better read/write times and is also built on slc.

i think anandtech should do some testing on removable drives. i have no idea how usb drives compare (flash or mechanic)

RE: umm....
By OrSin on 3/12/2007 7:37:41 AM , Rating: 2
This drive is not made for storage. ITs made for quick access time. Any system needs more then 8GB. Should a regular hard drive. But 99% all data I need quickly would fit on 8 GB easy. Really it could fit on 2-3 GB. OS and program need quick access. Out of all my data 80% is multimedia stuff. Yes, alot is pron so shoot me:). But how fast do you need to access mutlimedia files.

RE: umm....
By Hypernova on 3/12/2007 2:38:32 PM , Rating: 2
Hm... you seem to have complete ignored my first sentence.

RE: umm....
By typo101 on 3/13/2007 5:56:19 PM , Rating: 2
really? he talked about how he would like his OS and program files on the SSD (since they are what your drive is usually randomly seeking) and his multimedia on a magnetic disk drive (since they are large files that are accessed in a streaming manner)...

seems to fit right in with all of your post, especially the first line

RE: umm....
By FITCamaro on 3/12/2007 9:23:01 AM , Rating: 2
Well it'd be plenty for just an XP install and having Office. No it wouldn't be in a desktop replacement notebook though.

Of course almost all laptops now are coming with Vista now and thats what? 6-8GB for Vista Home Premium or Business?

RE: umm....
By TomZ on 3/12/2007 8:26:19 AM , Rating: 1
The read and write times are pretty good if you consider the device has a USB interface.

RE: umm....
By Radeon117X on 3/12/2007 8:43:24 AM , Rating: 2
Seems like a great idea when it comes to the random seeks. I would definitely agree with the fact that most of things that i use a lot could fit in 8GB, but it would definitely be an asset if they would step it up and release much bigger drives. Half Life 2 and Source games are about 9GB so... :P

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Related Articles
Adtron Announces 160GB Solid-state Drive
February 25, 2007, 5:40 PM
16GB RiDATA Flash SSD to Start at $265
January 10, 2007, 4:31 AM
SanDisk Unveils 1.8" 32GB Flash SSD Drive
January 4, 2007, 12:00 PM
Solid-state Drives Ready for Prime Time
November 15, 2006, 3:45 PM
Hands On with Asustek's R2H UMPC
October 30, 2006, 9:10 AM

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki