backtop


Print 126 comment(s) - last by labgeek.. on Feb 1 at 12:59 PM

Microsoft adjusts its policy for user with Vista upgrade CDs

Microsoft is changing a long-standing tradition when it comes to upgrading from a previous version of Windows to Windows Vista. When using an upgrade CD, popping in a previous version disc during setup will no longer satisfy the people in Redmond.

For example, when performing a clean install of Windows XP Professional using an upgrade CD, users would run through the normal setup routine until prompted to insert a previous version of Windows. A user could pop in a Windows 98 or Windows 2000 CD for upgrade compliance and then the setup routine would move along as usual.

Microsoft has cut out this process for Windows Vista and forces users who buy an upgrade CD to actually have a valid install of Windows XP Home or Professional on their machines before upgrading.

For most users, this wouldn't be a problem. They more than likely have an existing copy of Windows XP installed and would have no problems upgrading to Windows Vista with an upgrade CD.

But for do-it-yourselfers who buy a Vista upgrade CD and think that they can easily perform a clean install whenever they feel free are going to run into the road block. In this case, the road block means that users wanting to perform a clean install with a Vista upgrade CD will have to:

1) Install a genuine copy of Windows XP Home/Professional
2) Activate Windows XP through Microsoft
3) Upgrade to Windows Vista from within Windows XP

So if you plan on saving money by using a Vista upgrade CD instead of purchasing a full copy, be aware that you’re have a few extra steps involved before booting to the Vista desktop for the first time. If you don’t want to deal with the hassle, you’re going to have to pony up for a full copy of Vista.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By mindless1 on 1/31/2007 1:38:19 PM , Rating: 2
I would pose that the so-called tech savvy user was already running Win2k, will not have to borrow any disc. Remember, XP is not better than 2K, it has a lot of neutered crap included which is inferior in functionality to what any self-respecting tech already owned, and is mostly dumbed down for people that didn't know how to do anything, and overly protective since XPSP2 for those who couldn't help but keep getting themselves infected because of their poor application choices (IE and OE) or insecure computing practices.

Since practically anyone already had XP, there's no reason not to just do a clean install of it instead of 2k,even if you had both, unless of course someone was pirating everything up until Vista. If that is the situation, frankly I'd suggest that person buy an XP license instead of a Vista, if they are that crunched for money they would get more performance out of the hardware they can afford anyway.

At least Vista allows to wipe out the current installation, but then it really HAD to do that if you think about it, it was just too different to replace only the core OS files.


"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki