Life With "Penryn"
January 27, 2007 12:01 AM
comment(s) - last by
The first official die shot of "Penryn"
Intel's high-k, metal gate transistors replace the silicon-based elements of the transistor with hafnium and metal composites
Intel confirms new details on "Penryn" family: SSE4, high-k dielectrics, metal gate transistors
A little more than six months ago we wrote an editorial about Intel's future technology after Core 2 Duo, titled "
" Life after
inches closer, but, in the meantime, more details on the architecture are available today.
had the opportunity to chat with Mark Bohr, Intel Senior Fellow, and Steve Smith, Intel Vice President DEG Group Operations, about the upcoming CPU design.
The primary focus of Intel's next-generation process technology is
is the specific codename a 45nm mobile shrink of the
core, but the codename may also be used to describe the entire product family. Early last year Intel announced it would optically shrink to the next process node every two years. Staggered one year later, the company would also announce a new microarchitecture. This philosophy of shrink followed by architecture revision will undergo its first real milestone with the node shrink from 65nm to 45nm
. One year after the 45nm
shrink, Intel is also expected to announce its next-generation microarchitecture successor,
Intel claims the upcoming
will fit 410 million transistors for the dual-core model, and 820 million transistors for the quad-core variants -- dual-core
utilizes just 298 million transistors. Intel's 45nm SRAM shuttle chip, announced last year, had a little over 1 billion transistors and fit on a 119mm^2 package. However, the initial
quad-core processors will use a multi-die packaging, so it's realistic to expect only 410 million transistors per die at launch.
The optical shrink allows the engineers to boost clock speed, but the additional real estate means the company can put more logic on the processor as well. "Most of that transistor savings is spent on increasing the cache over Core 2" added Smith.
added additional SSE instructions at launch, but Intel claimed at Fall IDF 2006 that
SSE4 was specifically reserved for
. Intel's guidance for
claims the family will feature "New Intel SSE4 instructions expand capabilities and performance for media/HPC applications."
When asked about the effects of SSE4 on
Smith responded to
claiming "We're seeing excellent double digit performance [percentage] gains on multimedia applications."
is still not without its mysteries; a primary concern for enthusiasts is motherboard and socket support. Penryn will launch on Socket 775 -- meaning existing motherboards can physically harbor the new CPU, but electrically might not. "Motherboard developers will have to make some minor changes to support [
]. We can't guarantee that a person could just plug the chip into every motherboard on the market today." However, Smith also claimed
boot test that grabbed so many headlines last week
occurred on unmodified hardware that included a notebook, several desktop motherboards and several server motherboards.
The lithography process for
, dubbed P1266, is not just a shrink from 65nm to 45nm. Perhaps the most significant advance on P1266 is the use of high-k dielectrics and metal gate transistors. In a nutshell, the polysilicon gate used on transistors today is replaced with a metal layer and the silicon dioxide dielectric that sits between the substrate and the transistor is replaced by a high-k dielectric.
Intel's push for high-k dielectrics and metal gate transistors may be more significant than the node shrink. Intel's guidance documentation claims with the new high-k dielectric, metal gate transistors offer a 20% increase in current, which can translate to a 20% increase in performance. When the new transistor technologies run at the same current and frequencies as Core 2 Duo processors today, translates to a 5-fold reduction in source-drain leakage and a 10-fold reduction in dielectric leakage.
"The implementation of high-k and metal gate materials marks the biggest change in transistor technology since the introduction of polysilicongate MOS transistors in the late 1960s" claims Gordon Moore, Intel co-founder attributed with coining "Moore's Law."
Intel would not reveal the materials used in its metal gate technology, though Smith announced that the dielectric is hafnium based. Hafnium dioxide has been the leading candidate to replace silicon oxide inside academia for years. A different material is used for PMOS and NMOS gates.
Intel's lithography roadmap no longer ends at P1268, the 32nm node. Earlier today Intel revealed its 22nm node, dubbed 1270, slated for first production in 2011.
Smith closed our conversation with "In 2008, we'll have
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
1/27/2007 1:53:26 AM
I think this bit of media attention is to offset the recent statements by AMD about "K8L." Barcelona & Co., if they prove to be as powerful as AMD has claimed, will provide more than enough competition for Penryn to begin with. I wouldn't doubt that there are already whiteboards in AMD labs with ideas for the next architecture scribbled on them. They don't want to get stuck with a lacking architecture again as they have with K8 vs. C2D.
But it doesn't so much matter who makes the better processor at the time, the bottom line is that we, the consumers, get to reap the benefits of this processor war, :)
RE: AMD's response?
1/27/2007 3:36:58 PM
I think this is very true. Their marketing campaign is brutal and they are pretty much fighting and fending for every bit of realistate.
I might actually become an Intel fanboy if they keep up with these tech advancements. Like Anand said for the past 5 years it's been pretty boring and it looks like AMD poked a stick at a hornets nest. The only barrier I see now is DDR2 and DDR3. I've been running DDR for the past 3-4 years. I don't want to be upgrading to DDR2 and then DDR3 in the same year.
RE: AMD's response?
1/28/2007 4:33:50 AM
Hopefully it is true - but I am afraid that AMDs knee jerk reaction to buy ATI has taken waaaaay to much effort to consolidate. I belive that both ATI and AMD has lost about 6-12 months in development time by now. Hopefully I am wrong but the sad fact is that the AMD guys are n00bs in consolidating a major merger while Intels are Pros in that area.
Well hopefully AMD will pull a rabbit out of the hat or my trusty Opty 175 will (at the end of its useful life) be replaced by an Intel - and I want more competition not less.
If anyone have any info on the post acquisition consolitation process Id like to read about it.
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot
Intel 45nm "Penryn" Tape-Out Runs Windows
January 10, 2007, 2:13 AM
Intel Hints at SSE4
September 27, 2006, 4:00 PM
Intel Life After "Conroe"
June 20, 2006, 12:38 PM
AMD, Zen Processor might power the upcoming Apple MacBook Pro
September 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 - Battery Issue Fixed
August 30, 2016, 6:30 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Best Router for Your Home Network (Under $200.00)
August 6, 2016, 9:51 PM
Most Popular Articles
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Are farm children less likely to have allergies and asthma in adulthood?
Sep 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
MH 17 shot down by missile 'brought from Russia' into Ukraine's rebel territory
Sep 29, 2016, 5:00 PM
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information