Deciphering the Windows Experience Index
Anh Tuan Huynh
January 28, 2007 1:18 AM
comment(s) - last by
The WEI analysis tool shipped with Vista
Don't expect to run Flip 3D without a WEI of 3.0 on your graphics subsystem
Microsoft's new Windows Experience Index hopes to simplify your software purchases
Microsoft is two days away from
its long-awaited Windows Vista operating system. Windows Vista introduces a plethora of new features and enhancements that allows for greater security, a sleek new user interface and ease of use.
As with all new operating systems, however, new hardware may be required to take advantage of all the new features. Microsoft has devised a new rating system that will hopefully simplify future hardware and software purchases as well as give users a basic idea of the capabilities of a PC – say hello to the
Windows Experience Index
The new Windows Experience Index evaluates a systems performance right before the user sees the Windows desktop after a clean installation. It evaluates five subsystems and rates the system on a higher-is-better scale starting with 1.0. Processor, memory, graphics, gaming graphics and hard disk performance are the subsystems rated by the Windows Experience Index.
After evaluating the different subsystems, the system determines a base score of the system that is simply the score of the lowest performance subsystem and not an averaged overall score. The base score of the system determines the computing capabilities of a system. Microsoft offers a general description of system capabilities according to the base score in the Windows Vista
What is the Windows Experience Index
According to the Microsoft help file, a system with a base score of 1.0-2.0 is sufficient for basic productivity such as browsing the web and running office applications but lacks the horsepower to run Windows Aero or advanced multimedia functionalities such as Windows Media Center. Moving up to a score of 3.0 is a system that has enough power to run Windows Aero at a resolution of 1280x1024 and a few multimedia features such as standard definition video playback.
A score of 4.0-5.0 has the power necessary to take advantage of all Windows Vista functionality including Windows Media Center and audio/video streaming capabilities. The 4.0-5.0 rated system should also be capable of high definition video recording and playback, though recording will need a
. This also means the system will be able to play games sufficiently too. The help file also claims 5.0 is the highest base score of “the highest performing computers available when Windows Vista was released.”
test system was able to produce subscores of 5.9 with relatively modest enthusiast hardware.
In addition to the base scores, Microsoft allows users to view the individual subsystem scores too. Microsoft claims “If your base score is not sufficient for a program or Windows Vista experience, you can use the subscores to help you figure out which components you need to upgrade.” This should theoretically help end users decide which component to upgrade when their system lacks the power to run new applications.
Microsoft’s Windows Experience Index help file also outlines the recommended subsystem scores for office productivity, gaming and graphic-intensive applications and the Media Center experience. For office productivity tasks, Microsoft recommends higher-the-better scores in CPU and memory categories while scores of at least 2.0 in the other categories should be sufficient.
Gamers will want to pay closer attention to scores in the memory, desktop graphics and 3D-gaming graphics categories while subsystem scores of at least 3.0 in the other categories will offer a decent gaming experience.
Multi-media buffs that want to take advantage of Windows Media Center integrated in Windows Vista Ultimate and Home Premium editions will want high subsystem scores in CPU, hard disk and desktop graphics categories. Subsystem scores in the memory and 3D graphics categories are not too important, though Microsoft recommends a score of 3.0 or higher in those categories.
Software companies should easily be able to specify recommended base or subsystem scores for optimal performance in addition to the typical recommended system requirements. This should allow the general consumer to purchase software that fits the potential of their PC instead of having to spend countless hours with tech support questioning why the software does not work.
The Windows Experience Index will be particularly helpful with Microsoft’s Game for Windows initiative, though
Game for Windows
branded copy of Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy makes no mention of the Windows Experience Index.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: System Specs
1/28/2007 10:51:00 AM
An Athlon XP 2500+ is faster than a P4 3ghz? I just upgraded from my XP 2000+ a 5 year old system.
RE: System Specs
1/28/2007 9:11:06 PM
An Athlon XP 2500+ ? No way.
An Athlon XP 2500+
to 2.2GHz (stock speed of the 3200+), however, would run about on par with a 3.0GHz P4. Slightly faster in most things... save encoding (obviously)
RE: System Specs
1/29/2007 9:17:07 PM
For comparison, in artificial benchmarking, and some real-life benchmarking, my overclocked 4.0 GHz Pentium Extreme Edition (NetBurst/P4-core, dual-core, 1066 MHz front side bus, 2x2 MB L2 cache,) is slower than my 2.0 GHz Core Duo (Pentium M-core, dual-core, 667 MHz front side bus, 2 MB shared L2 cache.)
The old Pentium 4 cores are crappy. My Celeron-D (Pentium M core,) 1.4 GHz notebook runs rings around my Pentium 4 3.2 GHz desktop. They have the same amount and speed of memory, the notebook has a crappy 4200 RPM hard drive compared to the desktop's 5400 RPM (both 40 GB,) the desktop has Intel 945G graphics compared to the laptop's worse 915G graphics. Yet the laptop 'feels' faster in just about every way; and outscores the desktop in most artificial and real-world benchmarks. (Other than 3d gaming, since the 945 is better than the 915. And the desktop will support Aero while the laptop won't.)
"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer
Update: Consumer Versions of Windows Vista Available Early
January 23, 2007, 10:01 AM
AMD Announces TV Wonder Digital Cable Tuner
January 8, 2007, 3:48 AM
Gaming in Windows Vista
October 2, 2006, 9:24 AM
Quick Note: Whoops, Microsoft Pushed Unwanted Windows 10 to Some Users
October 15, 2015, 9:04 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 10565 Fixes Boot Camp 6.0 Issues
October 13, 2015, 11:39 AM
Microsoft's HD-500 ("Display Dock"), the Magic Sauce Behind Continuum
October 6, 2015, 5:30 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Hits 110 Million Devices, VMs
October 6, 2015, 4:30 PM
Windows 10 on Raspberry Pi, IoT Devices Sees Developer Debut
August 12, 2015, 2:41 PM
Sony Issues Bizzare "Do Not Update" Edict to VAIO PC Owners
August 11, 2015, 9:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information