FCC Says No to Sirius and XM Satellite Radio Merger
January 23, 2007 1:42 PM
comment(s) - last by
A monopoly in satellite radio is a big no says FCC
According to several reports, FCC chairman Kevin Martin said that it is
very unlikely the FCC will allow Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. to merge
. Both companies represent the two leading satellite radio entities currently in business in the U.S. and unfortunately, a merger in the eyes of the FCC is an obvious road to anti-competitive grounds.
Both Sirius and XM have been battling it out for the last several years, and in 2006 both companies saw their revenues drop as well as subscriber numbers drop. This peaked a notion in the industry that it was very possible that the two companies were in negotiations to go through a merger.
Share prices from both companies had dropped significantly in 2006, with Sirius shares dropping roughly 38-percent and XM shares dropping a whopping 46-percent of their value. Despite the shares dropping, the two companies continue to operate on speculation of a merger, which was also fueled by remarks made by XM CEO Mel Karmazin and chairman Gary Parsons. With their remarks, shares of both companies jumped last month but have since declined.
It is very unlikely, less than 50-percent chance, that Sirius and XM will receive FCC approval for merger, according to Martin. Even so, both companies will have to pass anti-trust regulations and audits. "There is a prohibition on one entity owning both of these businesses," said Martin.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Missing the Point from Geosynchronis Orbit
1/23/2007 11:29:30 PM
I agree with everything you say except for your assumptions about consumers' interests in signal quality. I don't think (and I believe the sales numbers bear me out on this) that there are nearly enough people making routine long-distance trips that are willing to spend the money on satellite radio, especially if it includes "promotionals." This is especially the case when you consider the (free) low cost of owning music these days. When you consider all this, the homogeneous advantage you described begins to look less and less significant -- and yet this was one of the biggest things XM used to attract investors when it got started. On top of all that, I'm no audiophile, and yet whenever I've listened to XM, I've been quickly fatigued by the lack of quality in the sound. I think it's much more comparable to listening to one of those wacko country stations you find on AM in the middle of Arkansas. It wasn't just bad, it made me want to turn it off. As a result, I've never really considered getting a subscription to XM.
RE: Missing the Point from Geosynchronis Orbit
1/24/2007 3:35:49 PM
I think that you missed my line about the long distance trips. I said that that benefit alone was not necessarily worth the $13 a month, but that all in, the features of satellite make it worth it.
I listen to lots of talk on XM and Sirius.....NPR, CNN, Howard, BTLS, etc, so I am easy on the concerns over streaming quality. Since the music I listen to goes through my PC and into my home audio, I can monkey with it to improve the audio. Going direct from the receiver into my audio stack is even better, so I really can live with what both XM and Sirius crank out. Does it match my digital IPOD or ZEN or my hard drive, maybe not, but it gets me more choice faster........
I also stated that terrestrial radio has more to fear from the IPOD than they do from XM or Sirius........take a look at how the 12-34 demographic consumes music......it aint via XM or Sirius.......but since the FCC doesnt regulate your IPOD, the whining exec's at the major radio companies run to the skirts of the FCC to complain about the easiest target to distract the industry from the fact that terrestrial radio content has been in free fall for some time and it is now becoming impossible to hide.......
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
LinkNYC Terminals to Blanket New York City With Free WiFi, Free Calls, and Ads
November 17, 2014, 6:50 PM
Microsoft is Open-Sourcing Most of .NET, Adding OS X and Linux Support
November 12, 2014, 8:27 PM
Home Depot Lost 53 Million Emails, Blames Windows, Buys Execs New Macs
November 9, 2014, 5:00 PM
Former NSA Lawyer: If Google, Apple Encrypt User Data, They’ll Wither on the Vine Like Blackberry
November 6, 2014, 12:15 PM
Report: AT&T Eyeing $40B DirecTV Purchase
May 1, 2014, 8:00 AM
WebOS Class Action Settlement Costs HP $57 Million
April 1, 2014, 10:22 AM
Most Popular Articles
Samsung is Bringing Sexy Back w/ Launch of Razor-Thin Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge
March 3, 2015, 2:25 AM
Australian Engineers Successfully Developed 3D-Printed Jet Engines
March 2, 2015, 11:08 AM
Scientists Tap Hard Data on 15,500 Penises to Estimate Average Length
March 3, 2015, 11:22 PM
Windows 10 Adds USB 3.1 for Dual-Role Peripherals, External Display Support
February 27, 2015, 11:39 AM
Windows 10 Testers: Beware Experimental NVIDIA Drivers Tied to DX12 Update
March 3, 2015, 11:13 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information