Print 6 comment(s) - last by oTAL.. on Jan 26 at 3:13 PM

Why did AMD and Intel start this most recent price war? They did a good job of wounding themselves in the process

In early 2006 when Intel announced its new architecture there was wide expectation that prices would stay constant at launch – Intel was expected to drop pricing only on the Pentium 4 architecture to clear out excess “sell-proof” inventory. In the meantime AMD already won a number of design wins throughout the industry, and it also had plans to finally tip the scales within Dell who (at the time) was a 100% Intel operation. Other than potentially losing the performance crown in the high end sliver, things were looking quite good for AMD.

So, imagine if you will the scenario where AMD and Intel both have equally compelling “good enough” products for the mainstream, and Intel is winning the performance game – this, in a nutshell, is where we sit today.

Click here for the rest of the article and comments...

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You are forgetting one thing:
By Captain Orgazmo on 1/23/2007 5:59:01 PM , Rating: 2
Price wars are great for the consumer. Intel has the crown right now in both the top performance and performance-per-dollar categories. This in perfect timing to take advantage of all the people who will upgrade their computers in time for Windows Vista. Local computer shops don't even bother trying to sell AMD anymore, they just mention how the $280 Intel outperforms the $400 AMD, and they are selling like hotcakes. The fact that you can buy a new computer for under $1500 with very respectable performance will entice many more people to buy, and boost Intel's earnings.

RE: You are forgetting one thing:
By oTAL on 1/26/2007 3:13:36 PM , Rating: 2
For under $1500
Right now, for $1000 you can get a great machine including a 19" 16:9 LCD monitor. You just have to find the distinction between what you crave for and what will actually be useful. Any graphics card over $200 is a waste of money for anyone on a small budget who doesn't take gaming seriously (I know many people may have other uses for GPUs, but those shouldn't be restricted by a small computer budget to begin with).

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
Latest By Rahul Sood
Ripping the Competition a New 20"
June 11, 2007, 9:31 PM
ATI Kung Fu better than NVIDIA's?
February 12, 2007, 9:49 AM
Blind Arrogance Developmental Disorder
February 4, 2007, 11:03 AM
Going Back to Basics
February 1, 2007, 2:39 AM
Why Start a War When You Don't Need to?
January 22, 2007, 2:01 PM
Rahul's Predictions for 007
December 28, 2006, 8:54 PM
What? Me Manipulate You?
December 2, 2006, 1:53 PM
Intel: From Winnie the Pooh to Red Bull
November 25, 2006, 3:28 PM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki