Report: U.S. Earth-monitoring Satellites 'Need Upgrades'
January 17, 2007 7:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
With more missions to Mars and the moon planned, researchers are forgetting the importance of the needs of people on Earth
A recent report done by the National Research Council has found that the U.S. satellite system that monitor's the environment and climate needs on Earth
must undergo vast upgrades or scientists may lose ability
to accurately forecast hurricanes, severe thunderstorms and winter storms. The report also called for NASA to launch 17 new satellites to launch by 2020. NASA and NOAA now have 25 satellites in orbit that specifically only conduct environmental measurements and observations – however, many of them are working past their initial expected service time.
“This is the most critical time in human history, with the population never before so big and with stresses growing on the Earth,” said Richard Anthes, co-chair on the committee which wrote the report.
The National Research Council of the National Academies also warned that by 2010, the number of instruments on satellites for Earth-observing purposes will be cut by around 40 percent.
The NOAA yearly budget of $1 billion per year for environmental satellites
must continue to remain available to the organization.
Spending $3 billion per year on new equipment and satellite missions through the year 2020 would sufficiently get Earth-observation back on the level it needs to be, according to space officials.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: UH oh
1/19/2007 9:16:04 AM
Ugh..sorry for the confusion post I had both comments on a notepad to copy in...
This part, was suppose to go to the "other guy"...
quote]You stated I would sacrifice millions. I would say that I am removing millions of soldiers and collaborators. [/quote]
No I think you are taking what the guy said out of context. Yes he stated he'd kill ever soul in Iraqi if it meant it would assure freedom for his kid and all American's...but this was an expression of his convictions of saying "I'd do what needed to be done, if it came to that." Which is, different than someone saying I want to murder everyone in Iraq.
You are having a heated debate with the OP, so you are taking out of context the parts the benefit your argument in order to "fight back". (This is what everyone does - so its normal).
"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information