AMD Asymmetric Physics Processing Requirements Revealed
Anh Tuan Huynh
January 9, 2007 12:18 PM
comment(s) - last by
Slide courtesy of Chile Hardware
Triple Play physics just around the corner
More information about ATI's long-awaited physics processing is finally trickling into light. ATI has named its GPU accelerated physics processing Asymmetric Physics Processing.
Hardware requirements for Asymmetric Physics Processing include two AMD ATI Radeon based graphics cards and a compatible CrossFire motherboard. One Radeon may be used as a GPU with an additional Radeon acting as a physics processor. The requirement for three Radeons to complete physics processing is only a requirement of Triple Play operation.
ATI’s Triple Play physics processing
is also supported with two ATI Radeon graphics cards operating in CrossFire with an equal or lesser performing third card dedicated to physics processing.
the full presentation for Asymmetric Physics Processing
in English and Spanish.
Asymmetric Physics Processing requires two AMD ATI Radeon graphics cards for baseline processing, the two graphics cards do not need a direct physical link like CrossFire. AMD is also touting the ability to mix and match different ATI Radeon graphics cards to have greater flexibility for users that upgrade their older graphics cards.
At this time it seems AMD chipsets are the only supported platform for Asymmetric physics processing. Supported chipsets include the AMD
ATI CrossFire Xpress 3200 (for Intel)
and the upcoming
. It is unknown if the CrossFire capable Intel 975X and P965 chipsets will be supported.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Too complicated
1/9/2007 6:38:06 PM
Memory bandwidth will be a serious constraint on physics in the near future. Think about how many times a second you have to alter data in physics.
Its the same reason they put on board memory on graphics cards, fighting with the CPU for bandwidth (not to mention less bandwidth to begin with) just doesnt work.
RE: Too complicated
1/9/2007 6:59:49 PM
whoops, I replied above his post accidentally, but I agree, memory bandwidth is certainly an issue. CPUs don't have it, but even fairly low-end GPUs do. Many cards are available for less than PhysX with a 256-bit bus and 1.4ns ram. That's 44.8gb/s. What's that, over twice Core 2 and over 3x PhysX.
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
DFI's RD600-TR2/G Launching December 15
November 28, 2006, 9:45 PM
AMD ATI CrossFire Xpress Chipsets Renamed, Again
November 15, 2006, 12:50 AM
ATI AMD Chipset Roadmap Detailed
October 9, 2006, 12:30 PM
ATI Goes for the Triple Play with Physics
June 6, 2006, 8:00 AM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information