backtop


Print 35 comment(s) - last by ThisSpaceForRe.. on Jan 6 at 4:48 PM

A quick look at the program outline for the International Solid State Circuits Conference reveals Power6 chips faster than 5GHz, Cell chips faster than 6GHz and 80-core Intel processors

This article was first published at HWUpgrade.com.

Many believe that the race for GHz ended with the Pentium 4 architecture, but you wouldn’t be able to tell by looking at the speed of these two upcoming IBM processors. According to the agenda of the International Solid State Circuits conference, IBM’s Power6 Processor will operate at speeds of over 5GHz in high-performance applications. The second-generation of the Cell Broadband Engine processor, which was co-developed by IBM, Sony and Toshiba, will run at 6GHz.  More details of Intel's "teraflop-on-a-chip" network processor will also be revealed.

The ISSCC2007 advanced program (PDF) claims IBM Power6 server processors are expected to begin shipping in 2007. Although it has been widely believed that the processors will run at a clock frequency between 4GHz and 5GHz, information provided by IBM for the ISSCC agenda states otherwise. The processor will run at over 5GHz in “high-performance applications” while also running at under 100 watts in “power sensitive applications.”’

IBM states that the Power6 offers “ultra-high frequency operation, aggressive power reduction, a highly scalable memory subsystem, and mainframe-like reliability, availability, and serviceability.” The dual-core 341 square millimeter processor features 700 million transistors. It is constructed using a 65-nanometer manufacturing process.

The ISSCC program also revealed technical details of the second generation IBM, Sony and Toshiba Cell Broadband Engine.  The first generation of the chip, which is currently used in the Sony PlayStation 3, runs at frequencies up to 3.2GHz. The second generation chip, on the other hand, will receive a frequency boost of nearly 3GHz and have an operating frequency of 6GHz at 1.3V. In addition, it will be constructed using 65nm CMOS SOI technology and will feature a dual power supply helping increase memory performance.

Despite IBM’s evident advancements in clock speed, Intel will still be holding firm to its multi-core approach to performance. According to the program schedule for ISSCC, Intel will reveal more details regarding its 80-core Tera-scale processor which can run 1.28 trillion floating-point operations per second.

Described as a “network-on-chip architecture,” the 225 square millimeter chip has 80 cores, each operating at 4GHz. The die is built using a 65nm process and is able to “achieve a peak performance of 1.0TFLOPS at 1V while dissipating 98W.” Currently, the processor is not able to run conventional applications for Intel chips.

Even though the chip is currently little more than a prototype, Intel CEO Paul Otellini claims it will be available within five years. The processor was first announced last September at the Intel Developer Forum.

The International Solid-State Circuits Conference will be taking place February 11-15 at the San Francisco Marriott Hotel. Other notable appearances will be given by Sun Microsystems, who will be discussing its Niagara2 processors, and AMD, who will be talking about its quad-core Barcelona processors expected to ship mid-2007.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: My vote for the win goes to....
By Comdrpopnfresh on 1/5/2007 4:12:42 PM , Rating: 1
what about benchmarking utilities made before dualcores? The benchmarking utilities have been added to to show impressible increases in the score of multicore processors! Didn't you ever read animal farm? Right now people with your view, baaahhing away whats been fed to them are playing the role of meat on wheels.....have fun at the glue factory.
I agree that dualcore is amazingly useful. But for the most part, it should stop there. The reviews of quadcore show little benefit unless you plan on rendering 12 things at once. The processors no longer fit the average user- they are straying away, towards the business market of servers which is a cash-cow for chip manufacturers. This is also the reason why intel switched to a unified architecture- gear towards servers, downgrade for users, and finally isolate problemed processors for value binning. This is how its working, not the consumer-centralized tier we've been told they are following.

Case in point:
The development of multiple quadcore Xenons for the server market, which will lead to quads for consumers thinking a corporation's computing needs are matching to their own, and those that have defective cache or cores will be binned to the value sector.

Dual cores have been around for a very short time in the scheme of things, and already fit the multitasking needs of majority of users. Why are companies continuing to plan a ramp up in the number of cores when the needs have been met?
Dual cores are wonderful devices, but multicore is not for the average user.


By ThisSpaceForRent on 1/6/2007 4:48:40 PM , Rating: 2
Without an installed hardware base, software developers have no motivation to develop multi-threaded applications. While multi-threaded apps are harder to develop, like any process this will improve as the industry moves towards programming those applications.

Pricewise the cost for the extra cores is negligble. Neither Intel or AMD wants to be more expensive than the other in their mainstream offerings, unless of course you're offering something the competition can't. Once they stop making single core processors this will also open up extra production capacity for multi core processors dropping the price further.

While I think the amount of system memory plays the most important role in determining the "speed" of any system. You still can't argue with having the processor power to crunch data, or multitask. I mean after all you can have all the RAM in the world, but once you reach 100% processor usage you're stuck waiting.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Related Articles
AMD 2007 Server Roadmap
December 14, 2006, 9:47 AM
Intel Shows Off Teraflop-on-a-Chip
September 26, 2006, 2:49 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki