FDA Declares Cloned Livestock Safe to Eat
December 30, 2006 3:16 PM
comment(s) - last by
The recent decision by the FDA will only ignite a debate for years to come
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently made a
tentative conclusion that meat and milk from some cloned animals is safe for human consumption
The decision has paved the way for the United States to become the first nation that allows products from cloned animals to be sold in grocery stores.
After years of numerous delays, the FDA report found that there is not much of a difference in composition of food from cloned animals compared to normal animals. Even if the FDA's assessment is officially approved in 2007, consumers may not be able to products from cloned animals since the technology remains too costly to be widely used.
The decision on Thursday immediately drew comments from critics from across the nation.
Opponents to cloned food are aiming to throw Congressional pressure to delay the policy before it is finalized.
Consumer groups are gravely concerned over potential health issues that may arise in some of the cloned animals.
Some cloned animals may have weakened immune systems and will need more drugs to stay healthy, according to activists and critics.
Don't be surprised if you begin seeing some sort of "clone-free" labels on meat and dairy products from cloned animals.
Ben & Jerry's ice cream, for example, already mentions that its farmers do not use any sort of bovine growth hormone on its cows.
Many opponents are not necessarily against cloned food, but want to make sure consumers know exactly what they are purchasing.
The FDA found, however, that there is "no science-based reason" for having to label cloned foods.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
1/3/2007 5:01:13 PM
Are you seriously putting Cuba forth as an example of efficiency? Good god, why can people not
Cuba's "agricultural revolution" succeeded in one thing only-- preventing the nation from starvation. It has two main factors. First, their large-scale farms (small by modern standards) are extremely labor intensive. They work for one reason, and one reason only. They utilize "enforced labor". Slavery, in simple words. This is simple fact, and easily verifiable.
This still doesn't provide enough food for the country, which brings us to the second factor. Over half the people in the country supplement this by growing their own food, in tiny backyard gardens...even many of those living in Havana itself still are forced to engage in agriculture. So in addition to working long hours in their regular job, they spend their "leisure time" as part-time farmers.
This is your example of the success of organic agriculture? You cut your legs out from under you. Look, we already knew its possibly to grow food organically. It's no different than we did in centuries past. It's just far too inefficient.
Ever see the movie
? Historically, its a mess...except for the part where Maximus-- one of the Empire's most respected Generals-- ran a farm in his spare time, operated by slaves. That was the model of the times. It was imperative that everyone farmed, no matter what their position. There just wasn't any way to grow enough food otherwise. And you seriously want to return to such a system?
1/26/2007 7:07:12 PM
Your BS runs beyond no limits as always. Don't think? You're the one who's assuming that everything gets thrown out, not me. The idea is to use what's there and the knowledge of how things work together to create sustainable farms.
You obviously didn't even read the link, which doesn't surprise me again. You preconceived prejudices puts your negative opinions and projects them so that you keep thinking I'm saying things i'm not.
As for slavery, where did you get that idea. Considering the fallout of the reduction of USSR help on the Cuban infrastructure, there would be no way that you could enslave the number of people that would make up that kind of deficit. The shortfall was made up and even exceeded by small independent farmers.
Here was a documentary that showed what they did and how they achieved it.
In it, they talk of farmers and agricultural workers making more money than professionals. Not about slavery.
Try unplugging those ears of yours and try for once to let fact create theory instead of trying to fit facts to your own theories and prejudices.
"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet. A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
EQ-Radio: A New Device for Wirelessly Detecting Emotions
September 26, 2016, 5:00 AM
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
FDA Cleared, Shockwave Lithoplasty for Peripheral Vascular Disease
September 22, 2016, 5:45 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Most Popular Articles
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information