Print 32 comment(s) - last by rykerabel.. on Jan 8 at 3:11 PM

Image courtesy Samsung
Look mom, no wires!

Fuel cell-based notebooks are nothing new to frequent readers of DailyTech. In early June, we reported on Toshiba's early efforts with a fuel cell notebook dock that was able to power a Portege notebook for 10 hours. In October, the company showed off an updated version of its fuel cell dock -- this time with a smaller fuel cell stack that was confined within the footprint of the host notebook.

Samsung is taking fuel cell technology for notebooks to the next level by showcasing a new DMFC (Direct Methanol Fuel Cell) dock that can power a Q35 ultraportable notebook for 8 hours a day for a full month. According to Samsung press release, the fuel cell has an energy density of 650Wh/L and total energy storage of 1,200Wh.

Samsung has also made many improvements to its fuel cell system that reduces noise levels. The new systems has noise levels comparable to current notebook computers which gives Samsung an edge over competing fuel cell designs.

Fuel cell technology has come a long way during the past year. Just last month SAIT and Samsung SDI showed off a prototype fuel cell battery charger that weighs just 5.3 ounces. Likewise, Nokia envisions that fuel cell-powered mobile phones are just a few years away.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: OK...
By Choppedliver on 12/28/2006 1:23:38 PM , Rating: 2
I don't get it. I buy a docking station to leave on my desk, therefore I don't need a battery because I can plug it in ( I'm assuming most people have power in their house, silly me )

I buy a laptop to take with me wherever I'm going. This is no different than buying a huge battery and lugging that around. What's the point? Am I going to be sitting on a plane or in a meeting with my laptop in my docking station? WTF? Someone help me out here, I am really not getting this

RE: OK...
By masher2 on 12/28/2006 1:30:54 PM , Rating: 3
> "This is no different than buying a huge battery and lugging that around. "

Your large battery will power you for a few hours. This would let you take your laptop on a weeklong business trip, leave behind the power brick, and never worry about swapping batteries. If you're doing a lot of flying or travelling in car/taxi, you just don't have time to stop and recharge.

And this docking station may be large, but its certainly smaller and more convenient than the charging brick and a couple extra-high capacity batteries.

Still, I imagine that the production version of this will be even smaller, and tuned to provide several days runtime, rather than a full month.

RE: OK...
By ninjit on 12/28/2006 5:51:58 PM , Rating: 2
Good luck getting a methanol-based fuel-cell onto an airplane next time you fly - gives a whole new meaning to exploding notebooks we've all already heard about.

I don't see how fuel cells will replace batteries any time soon, it just doesn't seem that practical.

Mostly I can see this having a lot use in the field, military laptops, scientists in Antarctica etc. Having a fuel cell power your equipment vs. lugging around a big generator (even small ones are a pain) would be a huge boon in those kinda situations.

RE: OK...
By masher2 on 12/28/2006 11:47:43 PM , Rating: 1
Next time I fly? No...but they'll eventually be certified safe for airflight. After all, you can already possess ethanol on a flight, so why not methanol?

RE: OK...
By TTowntom2 on 1/4/2007 2:40:31 PM , Rating: 2
sure you can take the fuel cell, but what about the methanol tanks?

RE: OK...
By Hawkido on 12/28/2006 1:52:41 PM , Rating: 5
You point is valid for your lifestyle. Too bad the world isn't full of carbon copies of yourself. Then we all could just sit in our air conditioned offices/homes and use our laptops.

However let's look at the other 6 billion people in the world. OLPC for instance... this would be lots better than pulling a cord. How about the military personel running black ops in the field for weeks at a time? What about the construction contractor surveying at new site with no facilities for recharging. Hey all of these are great examples of people not like you. People like this need this technology. Don't think that every product needs to be applicable to 100% of the market, else I will ask you to demonstrate on yourself the proper use of a tampon on the male anatomy. That product only has less than 35% target market.

If it was the label "docking station" that is causing you difficulties, concider this: It is merely called a docking station moreso because of it's looks and the way it attaches to the computer, rather than because of the features it adds to the laptop.

RE: OK...
By TommyBoyz8 on 12/28/2006 4:08:50 PM , Rating: 3
Funny you should mention a Tampon has only 35% (aprox) target market. But are you saying that all of that 35% is women during a menstrual cycle? Don't forget that the military can use tampons. Our president has made war and those excessive gunshot wounds don't cover themselves up. A Tampon can be used to suck up excess bloos loss while expanding to close the gap from more bleeding. There are other uses as well. But thought is funny to bring that up.

RE: OK...
By Lazarus Dark on 12/28/2006 5:48:55 PM , Rating: 2

RE: OK...
By TTowntom2 on 1/4/2007 2:40:54 PM , Rating: 2
I coulda done without that post.

RE: OK...
By rykerabel on 1/8/2007 3:11:45 PM , Rating: 2
um, what is gross about a moisture absorbing lifesaving bundle of fiber that just happens to have a "more common" use?

Life: 1
silly pretensions: 0

RE: OK...
By MonkeyPaw on 12/28/2006 7:18:18 PM , Rating: 2
I'd imagine it would have very good applications for mobile work crews. GIS/GPS teams, researchers/grad students in exotic locales, disaster relief crews, etc. could all stand to have a quick way to set up and get organized. Oh, and don't forget the military. There are still places on earth that lack electricity, and such a fuel cell would be a welcome product to people who have to work in such places. The average notebook user doesn't need this, but there are definitely others that do!

"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki