Lockheed Martin's F-35 Lightning II single-seat fighter made
flight this past Friday. The F-35 is the production version of the X-35
Joint Strike Fighter prototype which was selected over the competing Boeing
The flight marked the culmination of a five-year gestation
period and was for the most part successful. "The Lightning II performed
beautifully," said F-35 Chief Pilot Jon Beesley. The flight was scheduled
to last an hour, but was ended after just 38 minutes. An in-flight glitch took
place in which an air data probe flashed a warning in the cockpit. As a result,
“gear-up" testing was not performed during the flight. "We designed
the aircraft with redundancy so if one of the sensors is out we can fly with
the other one. That part worked just fine," said Beesley.
There will be three distinct versions of the plane in the
$276.6 billion USD program. Prices will range from $45 million USD per plane
for the F-35A to $60 million per plane for the F-35C.
The F-35A is the smallest/lightest of the bunch and will be
put into service by the US Air Force. It is destined to replace the F-16 and
A-10 (oh how we will miss the GAU-8/A Avenger).
The F-35B is the STOVL variant which will replace the AV-8 Harrier currently in
service with the US Marine Corps. The F-35C will be used by the US Navy where
it will replace the F-18A/B/C/D.
The United States is currently partnered with Australia, Great
Britain, Canada, Denmark, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway and Turkey on the F-35 program. Other
countries including Israel and Singapore are also interested in the F-35
Given all the news surrounding the success of unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs), it would be interesting to see if Lockheed's proposed pilot-less variant of the
F-35 will ever see the light of day -- if only in prototype form.
quote: The stealthy F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th-generation fighter designed to replace aging AV-8B Harriers, A-10s, F-16s, F/A-18 Hornets and United Kingdom Harrier GR.7s and Sea Harriers.
quote: It (F-35) is destined to replace the F-16 and A-10 (oh how we will miss the GAU-8/A Avenger).
quote: In summer 1985, Michael Ledeen, a consultant of Robert McFarlane, asked Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres for help in the sale of arms to Iran. The Israeli government required that the sale of arms meet the approval of the United States government , and when it was convinced that the U.S. government approved the sale by Robert McFarlane, Israel obliged by agreeing to sell the arms. In July 1985, Israel sent American-made BGM-71 TOW (Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided) anti-tank missiles. Reverend Benjamin Weir was subsequently released; despite the fact that arms were being sold to Iran, only Weir was released. This resulted in the failure of Ledeen's plan with only three shipments through Israel.
quote: From 1949 through 1965, U.S. aid to Israel averaged about $63 million per year, over 95% of which was economic development assistance and food aid. A modest military loan program began in 1959. From 1966 through 1970, average aid per year increased to about $102 million, but military loans
increased to about 47% of the total. From 1971 to the present, U.S. aid to Israel has averaged over $2 billion per year, two-thirds of which has been military assistance.
quote: UNIFIL's most notorious collaboration with terrorists involved the kidnapping and murder of three Israeli soldiers, and the subsequent cover-up.
On October 7, 2000, Hezbollah terrorists entered Israel, attacked three Israeli soldiers on Mount Dov, and abducted them Lebanon. The kidnapping was witnessed by several dozen UNIFIL soldiers who stood idle. One of the soldier witnesses described the kidnapping: the terrorists set of an explosive which stunned the Israeli soldiers. Clad in UN uniforms, the terrorists called out, "Come, come, we’ll help you."
The Israeli soldiers approached the men in UN uniforms. Then, a Hezbollah bomb detonated—-apparently prematurely. It wounded the disguised Hezbollah commander, and three Israeli soldiers.
Two other terrorists in U.N. uniforms dragged their Hezbollah commander and the three wounded soldiers into a getaway car.
According an Indian solider in UNIFIL who witnessed the kidnapping, "By this stage, there was a big commotion and dozens of UN soldiers from the Indian brigade came around." The witness stated that the brigade knew that the kidnappers in UN uniform were Hezbollah. One soldiers said that the brigade should arrest the Hezbollah, but the brigade did nothing.
According to the Indian soldier, the UNFIL brigade in the area "could have prevented the kidnapping."
"The United States has always supported Israel at the UN and can be counted upon to veto any resolutions that are critical."
Many people believe the United States can always be relied upon to support Israel with its veto in the UN Security Council. The historical record, however, shows that the U.S. has often opposed Israel in the Council.
In 1990, for example, Washington voted for a Security Council resolution condemning Israel's handling of the Temple Mount riot earlier that month. While singling out “the acts of violence committed by Israeli security forces,” the resolution omitted mention of the Arab violence that preceded it.
In December 1990, the U.S. went along with condemning Israel for expelling four leaders of Hamas, an Islamic terrorist group. The deportations came in response to numerous crimes committed by Hamas against Arabs and Jews, the most recent of which had been the murders of three Israeli civilians in a Jaffa factory several days earlier. The resolution did not say a word about Hamas and its crimes. It described Jerusalem as “occupied” territory, declared that Palestinians needed to be “protected” from Israel and called on contracting parties of the Geneva Convention to ensure Israel's compliance. It was the first time the Security Council invoked the Convention against a member country.
In January 1992, the U.S. supported a one-sided resolution condemning Israel for expelling 12 Palestinians, members of terrorist groups that were responsible for perpetrating violence against Arab and Jew alike. The resolution, which described Jerusalem as “occupied” territory, made no mention of the events that triggered the expulsions — the murders of four Jewish civilians by Palestinian radicals since October.
In 1996, the U.S. went along with a Saudi-inspired condemnation of Israel for opening a tunnel in "the vicinity" of the al-Aksa mosque. In fact, the tunnel, which allows visitors to see the length of the western wall of the Temple Mount, is nowhere near the mosque. Israel was blamed for reacting to violent attacks by Palestinians who protested the opening of the tunnel.
The United States did not cast its first veto until 1972, on a Syrian-Lebanese complaint against Israel. From 1967-72, the U.S. supported or abstained on 24 resolutions, most critical of Israel. From 1973-2003, the Security Council adopted approximately 100 resolutions on the Middle East, again, most critical of Israel. The U.S. vetoed a total of 37 resolutions and, hence, supported the Council's criticism of Israel by its vote of support, or by abstaining, roughly two-thirds of the time.12
In July 2002, the United States shifted its policy and announced that it would veto any Security Council resolution on the Middle East that did not condemn Palestinian terror and name, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aksa Martyrs Brigade as the groups responsible for the attacks. The U.S. also said that resolutions must note that any Israeli withdrawal is linked to the security situation, and that both parties must be called upon to pursue a negotiated settlement (Washington Post, July 26, 2002). The Arabs can still get around the United States by taking issues to the General Assembly, where nonbinding resolutions pass by majority vote, and support for almost any anti-Israel resolution is assured.
quote: If it is beneficial to Israel to sell it to China, then Israel has the full sovereign right to sell it; no matter how much it may inconvenience the U.S.
quote: The ex-dictator remained defiant in court, even as details emerged of entire villages being destroyed by his order...
quote: The Iraqi people participated in democratic lections on January 30, 2005, for the first time in more than 30 years ...
quote: ''The regime is gone,'' says Osama al-Quraishi, an Iraqi entrepreneur who returned to Baghdad to search for business opportunities after decades in exile in Europe and the Middle East. ''There are no restrictions. There are no rules.'' He predicts Baghdad will soon replace Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, as the Middle East's commercial center. Under Saddam, the shops were silent, the goods available were obsolete or absurdly overpriced, and the cars were clunkers dating back 15 or 20 years. Now that Saddam is gone, signs of bounty are visible everywhere in Baghdad and to a lesser extent in smaller cities such as Mosul and Basra....
quote: “Iraqi children have been learning in dilapidated facilities...By creating safe, clean schools for these children, we’re trying to provide them with an environment where they can blossom...
quote: “Within two months, all major Iraqi cities and most towns had municipal councils – something that took eight months in postwar Germany.
Within four months the Iraqi Governing Council had appointed a cabinet – something that took 14 months in Germany.
An independent Iraqi Central Bank was established and a new currency announced in just two months – accomplishments that took three years in postwar Germany.
Within two months a new Iraqi police force was conducting joint patrols with coalition forces.
Within three months, we had begun training a new Iraqi army – and today some 56,000 are participating in the defense of their country. By contrast, it took 14 months to establish a police force in Germany and 10 years to begin training a new German army.”...