Microsoft Files for DVR Advertisement Patent
December 10, 2006 9:18 PM
comment(s) - last by
Microsoft's ad serving patent
Ads served under its system are better, says Microsoft
Microsoft last week filed a patent for DVRs that addresses an issue that advertisers have been scratching their heads over for quite some time: time-sensitive ad skipping. According to surveys, 15-percent of all DVR owners in the U.S. claimed that they used their DVR units primarily to skip ads. This of course presents a problem for advertisers, which interestingly, presents a problem for Microsoft's own patent.
proposes that ads do not get permanently embedded into a TV program, but rather a DVR ad-based server be used instead. The server will track where ads are to be played throughout a program and insert an appropriate ad. This way, time-sensitive ads will be played or not played appropriately.
Prior to Microsoft's patent, a user may decide to record a program that he or she may miss because of a business trip. A week later, when they watch their recorded show, a time-sensitive ad such as one that promotes a two-day sale at their favorite big-box retailer may no longer be relevant. Instead of seeing an ad that's new an relevant, an old ad is played and the ad spot is wasted. Microsoft's DVR advertisement system addresses this very issue.
Using a DVR-based advertisement database, a time-sensitive database is kept of all current ads being served on network TV. When a user watches a particular program, the Microsoft ad server will lookup relevant and appropriate ads from the network that produced the program and serve ads. If a show is recorded and watched repeatedly over time, different ads will be served. This method helps advertisers target and produce ads appropriately.
Unfortunately (or fortunately), a user can still opt to skip an add, regardless of whether or not they find the ad useful or not. Researchers say that more and more users are skipping ads. In fact, 15-percent is double the amount of ad-skippers from the previous year. According to Microsoft's filing:
The playback system (whether network-based or client-based) can then signal which advertisement region boundary has been crossed, and the advertisement manager can initiate that an advertisement obtained from the advertisement data store be provided as a second data stream to the playback system which renders the advertisement for viewing. The DVR can again provide the recorded media content for viewing when requested a second time.
Earlier this year,
reported that TiVo had stepped up to
the advertising plate
, launching an entire division dedicated to ad research. The plan was to monitor a select group of users and see when ads were skipped, where they skipped and for how long. TiVo mentioned that it would also launch a tracking and reporting program for ads, so that agencies can produce better targeted ads.
Some analysts and many users believe that as for as ads go, Microsoft won't be introducing anti-skipping technology anytime soon simply because the company is deep in the DVR market now -- eliminating one of the primary uses of a DVR will only directly affect its sales. Many may recall that Microsoft was actually a DVR manufacturer several years ago after it pioneered the now defunct UltimateTV.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Grammatical errors is present
12/11/2006 2:01:00 PM
Ads served under its system
better, says Microsoft
(Title is wrong for irony)
RE: Grammatical errors is present
12/11/2006 4:03:52 PM
To my knowledge, they is right. Just remove "served under its system" and you'll see ;). Or rewrite it, "When ads are served under their system, they are better."
I think the system is interesting if someone enjoys ads for what they're worth. I don't mind ads all too much, but I can't get my local channels in HD anyway, so I'd rather download them to ensure better quality when viewing them on my TV. Also, I'd need a DVR to perform the insane amount of pausing that I do while watching downloaded TV XD.
RE: Grammatical errors is present
12/11/2006 5:37:05 PM
Thanks for agreeing with me by accident?
You rewrote it with
, as I did. I guess you missed that the grammar mistake was that they used
, instead of
, in the title?
"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad
TiVo Launches Ad Research Division
July 27, 2006, 11:28 AM
IBM Workers Strike Over Terms of Deal That Will Have Them Working for Lenovo
March 6, 2014, 9:29 AM
Google Picking Up Artificial Intelligence Company "DeepMind" for $400 Million
January 27, 2014, 9:25 AM
Quick Note: Qualcomm Grabs up Palm, IPAQ, and Bitfone Patent Portfolio from HP
January 24, 2014, 9:18 AM
Verizon Buys Intel Media OnCue Cloud TV assets
January 21, 2014, 10:26 AM
Google's First Asian Data Centers Now Operational
December 11, 2013, 8:50 AM
IBM to Offer Watson Supercomputer as Cloud Development Platform
November 14, 2013, 12:00 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information