AMD Announces "Brisbane" 65nm Processors
Anh Tuan Huynh
December 5, 2006 1:27 AM
comment(s) - last by
Athlon 64 X2 gets the 65nm treatment
oday announced its long-awaited 65nm
core Athlon 64 X2 processors
. This begins AMD’s transition to 65nm from 90nm. AMD expects to transition its complete product lineup to 65nm in mid-2007. Nevertheless, four
Athlon 64 X2 processors are launching today—the 5000+, 4800+, 4400+, and 4000+. All 65nm
core processors are equipped with 2x512KB of L2 cache.
AMD Athlon 64 X2
, AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual-core processors equipped with 2x1MB of L2 cache will become a thing of the past as AMD completes its 65nm transition. While AMD has announced its
core 65nm processors, the processors only available in limited quantities. Expect mass availability in Q1’2007.
OEMs are expected to deliver
powered systems as well. These OEMs include Acer, Dell, Founder, Gateway, HP, Lenovo, Packard Bell and TongFang. Dell is expected to adopt
65nm processors in its Optiplex and Dimension desktops while Acer is expected to have
powered Aspire systems too.
65nm processors start at $169 for the 4000+ and goes up to $301 for the 5000+ in quantities of 1000. Do note that
core processors are still K8 based and not
K8L like the upcoming
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Odd Frequency
12/6/2006 3:13:47 AM
AMD is going to 1/2 multipliers in order granulate their bin splits. Prior, AMD would make 200 increment model number steps by 200 MHz clocking delta coupled with 512 or 1 meg cache.
Since the die size is substantially larger for 1 meg cache on a dual core product, they did away with the 4000+, 4400+, and 4800+ at 90 nm. However, this has a deleterious affect on revenue... why? Say you have a processor that just barely fails the 2.4 GHz bin but would run great at 2.3 GHz ... but you don't have a 2.3 GHz division so you must sell it as a 2.2 GHz which commands a lower price.
Now, you can do this one of two ways, create a processor that gives high clocks and stable processors over a range of clock speeds in which case an integer multiplier would do just fine... but, implementing a 1/2 multplier simply means they cannot get the clocks to go high enough and the distribution is such that they cannot bin/granulate the product to make the most money.
In order to increase revenue AMD wants to sell up that is try to get more money for 100 MHz by labeling it as a 200 model number increase, in short, they are selling you on the fact that 100 MHz is actually 200 Model number better. Perhaps it is.... it is all scale and relative performance, which right now takes up the low end no matter the clock.
"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
AMD Beyond "Brisbane"
November 14, 2006, 6:31 PM
AMD 65nm Product Plans Unveiled
November 14, 2006, 3:17 PM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 - Battery Issue Fixed
August 30, 2016, 6:30 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Best Router for Your Home Network (Under $200.00)
August 6, 2016, 9:51 PM
5 Top Rated Printers for Home or Small Office
July 29, 2016, 10:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information