Print 39 comment(s) - last by umerok.. on Nov 21 at 12:33 PM

"You know, Sony can make 80,000 bricks, and people would buy them."

With Microsoft having just completed development on two major software releases and having recently secured a partnership with Novell on Suse Linux, Bill Gates surely has a lot to talk about. CNET's Ina Fried was able to interview Microsoft's founder and get his thoughts on the recent happenings at Microsoft.

Right of the bat, the discussion turned towards Windows Vista. The operating system went gold two weeks ago and is due to be available to retail customers on January 30. Bill Gates was drilled on the future of the SQL-based WinFS (Windows Future Storage). The feature was due to ship with Vista and was later dropped altogether.

"Well, you definitely still want a structured look for certain kinds of rich query. And if we're going to bring all these things of e-mail and files and photos, bring it together fully, we need more than just the search indexing. Search indexing takes you further than people expect, I would say. But eventually you'll need more of a database-type look to these things," said Gates.

Gates also went on to talk about the recent partnership with Novell. "In general, Linux is not nearly as high-volume as Windows is on servers. But (it's) significant, so customers want new kinds of interoperability." Gates goes on to say "We've done fantastic things on interoperability. Here, we're doing virtual machine interoperability. So you can just have a pool of hardware and applications that use Linux, applications that use Windows, and just have the VM manage which one needs more resource, which one is done, which one needs to be restarted."

On the subject of Microsoft's Xbox 360 console, which now has prime competition in the form of the Sony PlayStation 3 and Nintendo Wii, Gates is quite confident in the gaming platform. In fact, Gates wasted no time in touting Microsoft's enviable one-year head start on the market. "You know, Sony can make 80,000 bricks, and people would buy them. So the real competition--you're going to see the impact of our innovation and all the momentum we have in Christmas 2007. This Christmas, the story is: XBox 360 is going to sell super-well, and they'll sell the rounding error amounts they can make."

For the full interview, head on over to CNET News.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By cornfedone on 11/20/2006 8:45:07 AM , Rating: -1
So Bill Gates basically is saying he knows he's been defrauding the world out of hundreds of Billions of dollars with his defective products.

By OrSin on 11/20/2006 9:04:25 AM , Rating: 4
I just getting sick of MS bashers. I not a fan boy, but damn if his OS is so bad then don't use it. Why constantly complain about teh same thing over and over, when no one who cares gives a damn. If you even get in room with gates or a developer at MS then sure whine your head off.

Could MS OS be better. Sure it could be but to make something that both a Top level engineer and a grnadmother can use is hard. Then include in the lazy hardware manfuratures that put out bad drives.

And yes Gate has contributed more to Charities then anyone in history. And he did while still relatively young. But he gets no credit because most of the money has to minoraties.

By Aikouka on 11/20/2006 9:18:57 AM , Rating: 4
No, he gets no credit because people have some zany instilled hatred because their operating system has crashed before. Yet, I don't see why Party Poker causing system instability is Microsoft's fault? Maybe someone should create System Monitoring Anti-PEBKAC software? The software would track what you do and if it sees you making stupid decisions ( such as installing PartyPoker or something wonderful from 180 Solutions ), it will lower your access rights automatically. Therefore, you will not be able to make such dumb choices which gives your computer a PEBKAC.

By psychobriggsy on 11/20/2006 9:41:23 AM , Rating: 5
A decent OS doesn't let dodgy application software destabilise it.

However the OS isn't helped by application software trying to alter system libraries and configurations. Hence the increasing level of system file protection in Windows to stop applications (and more sneaky software) altering the OS.

We all know the sheepbrained masses won't bother to learn how to run a computer properly so they don't get viruses, spyware and all that. Even if the OS enforced non-administrator accounts for users, they'd happily pop in their password when it said "SpyOnYou Pro 4 Installer blah blah"...

The safest OS would be one that only executed applications that were signed by the OS vendor. If Microsoft went that route, you can imagine the uproar about limiting freedom, etc, even if the service was free and merely involved checking that the application was safe for end users. OTOH this is what Microsoft is moving towards for drivers (WHQL etc), but that's because it will guarantee good quality drivers only.

By Aikouka on 11/20/2006 10:30:16 AM , Rating: 1
The OS gives a lot of power, but so do most Linux variants. The thing is, almost everyone runs Windows as an Administrator, which is comparable to always running Linux in root (there's the "su" command in linux for a reason). Unfortunately, explaining to users that they should receive less access priviledges would probably fall on a deaf ear as most people would either not care or find it offensive that you consider them "too stupid" to manage Windows.

By kamel5547 on 11/20/2006 12:32:49 PM , Rating: 2
Well at least for home users... most of our user base runs as "power user" and cannot install *most* applications. Mind you I hate companies (Google for example) that design their applications so they cna be installed without admin privileges. Its amazing how little spyware there is compared to when people ran as admins. Of course it also has the side benefit of keeping all the licensing ducks in a row.

By emboss on 11/20/2006 11:15:08 PM , Rating: 2
Another reason could be that most of the money was obtained through what could be at best be described as unethical business practices ...

By AlexWade on 11/20/2006 11:37:02 AM , Rating: 4
Unlike most people, I've actually dabbled into complex world of the OS. In college, I had to write a program that would swap data in and out of pseudo-memory and into an actual page file as needed. It was very limited and simple being more akin to early page files, but it was still a very complex program. After that class, I had a newfound respect for any OS because of how very complex they are.

MS has done a lot of things that make me mad -- such as high prices on Office, DRM, the desire to control everything -- but they what they do with Windows has my utmost respect.

When you realize how complex an OS really is, you don't complain about all the security holes and spyware. Sure, Microsoft could do better with security. But make no mistake, Windows is a security target because you target what is most likely to succeed. How many novice people use Linux or Unix or OS X? By far, the most novice computer users use Windows. That is why Windows has a problem with spyware, because these idiots target where they are more likely to get a victim.

By Aikouka on 11/20/2006 11:49:27 AM , Rating: 4
Alex, I don't think your change of heart is far from the norm at all. It's very common in today's society to scorn what we don't understand. Think of waiting in line at a fast food restaurant... you tend to get angry at any long waits, yet you have no idea what's going on behind the scenes. When I was younger, I worked at one of those restaurants (namely McDonalds :P) and because of it, I gained a lot more understanding toward what happens in said environment. Because of that, I am never mad when my order ends up wrong, when I have to wait longer than normal or whatever. Although visiting a McDonalds in Virginia and not being able to understand the all-Hispanic crew was a different story. Albeit, it was a good experience to brush up on some español ;).

The same is really true for you and your OS-esque programming experience. You gained an understanding of how complex and Operating System really becomes. Essentially, you're the programmer who understands how hard a programmer's job really can be. The average Joe Schmoe doesn't understand this and because of it, he's quick to scorn.

By retrospooty on 11/20/2006 12:29:51 PM , Rating: 2
"So Bill Gates .... defrauding the world with his defective products."

There is a word for people that cant get thier OS to run properly... noobie.

Not to say that Windows is perfect, but it is by far the best thing out there. Everyone seems to complain about windows, yet they use it daily. What do you think the alternative is? OSX? Linux? Hardly up to snuff, niether is ready to take on anything remotley close to what Bill Gates and that "horrible" windows software has accomplished.

By Topweasel on 11/20/2006 1:18:36 PM , Rating: 2
I had to give you a negative score for your inability to read.

He was making a point that PS3 was in shorter supply then forcasted (by a couple 10k allotments)due to them rounding, and also by slightly higher then Sony planned failure rates.

He basically said the X-box360 will sell well and that sony will sell whatever amount they end up making.

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki