backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by Trisped.. on Nov 21 at 3:42 PM

CPU and GPU all in one to deliver the best performance-per-watt-per-dollar

AMD today during its analyst’s day conference call unveiled more details of its next-generation Fusion CPU and GPU hybrid. Early mentions of Fusion first appeared shortly after AMD’s acquisition of ATI Technologies was completed a few months ago. AMD is expected to debut its first Fusion processor in the late 2008 to early 2009 timeframe.

AMD claims: “Fusion-based processors will be designed to provide step-function increases in performance-per-watt-per-dollar over today’s CPU-only architectures, and provide the best customer experience in a world increasingly reliant upon 3D graphics, digital media and high performance computing.”

The GPU and CPU appear to be separate cores on a single die according to early diagrams of AMD’s Fusion architecture. CPU functionality will have access to its own cache while GPU functionality will have access to its own buffers. Joining together the CPU and GPU is a crossbar and integrated memory controller. Everything is connected via HyperTransport links. From there the Fusion processor will have direct access to system memory that appears to be shared between the CPU and GPU. It doesn’t appear the graphics functionality will have its own frame buffer.

While Fusion is a hybrid CPU and GPU architecture, AMD will continue to produce discrete graphics solutions. AMD still believes there’s a need for discrete graphics cards for high end users and physics processing.

Also mentioned during the conference call is AMD’s new branding scheme regarding ATI products. Under the new branding scheme, chipsets for Intel processors and graphics cards will continue on with the ATI brand name. ATI designed chipsets designed for AMD platforms will be branded under AMD as previously reported.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Physics acceleration
By saratoga on 11/18/2006 3:22:22 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
There's more to it than just bandwidth.


Eh, not really. Bandwidth is all that matters in this case, since its what the CPU lacks most of all.

quote:
By accessing the L2 cache, the latencies will be considerably lower than by going through a NB or a PCIe tunnel+HT link.


Yeah, but thats not really useful for a GPU.

quote:
As a PPU, Fusion could also shine, as Physics calculations benefit greatly from being in low-latency communication with the CPU. This is why AMD plans to have Torrenza for graphics and physics cards, among other things.


Ok, but if you're just using the GPU as an inefficient DSP, thats something else entirely. If you just need vector throughput, why not put more SIMD/MIMD resources on the chip? After all, theres no reason current CPUs max out at 2x128 bit vector ops per clock. You could very easily add more, if there was demand for it.

Something like this would be interesting of course, but it seems odd to try and build a device thats both the CPU's GPU and it's DSP/SIMD engine. I have to question how well it would function in this hybrid role.

I think the main advantage is going to be power consumption and cost, with performance being a distant third (or more likely a disadvantage).


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki