AMD Announces "Fusion" CPU/GPU Program
Anh Tuan Huynh
October 25, 2006 4:46 AM
comment(s) - last by
The future of CPU/GPU computing
completion of AMD’s acquisition of ATI
, AMD has announced its working on new CPU/GPU silicon that integrates the CPU and graphics processor into a single unit. The upcoming silicon is currently codenamed
and is expected in the late 2008 or early 2009 time frame. AMD claims Fusion will bring:
AMD intends to design Fusion processors to provide step-function increases in performance-per-watt relative to today’s CPU-only architectures, and to provide the best customer experience in a world increasingly reliant upon 3D graphics, digital media and high-performance computing. With Fusion processors, AMD will continue to promote an open platform and encourage companies throughout the ecosystem to create innovative new co-processing solutions aimed at further optimizing specific workloads. AMD-powered Fusion platforms will continue to fully support high-end discrete graphics, physics accelerators, and other PCI Express-based solutions to meet the ever-increasing needs of the most demanding enthusiast end-users.
AMD expects to integrate
for all its product categories including laptops, desktops, workstation, servers and consumer electronics products. Judging by the inclusion of PCI Express support, it would appear the integrated GPU is more of a value solution—similar to Intel’s cancelled
processor. It is unknown if AMD will retain the current Athlon and Opteron names with the launch of
. This isn't too surprising as
AMD and ATI previously promised unified product development including vague mentions of hybrid CPU and GPU products.
AMD also previously announced its
open architecture as well.
In addition to
, AMD expects to ship integrated platforms with ATI chipsets in 2007. The platforms are expected empower commercial clients, notebooks, gaming and media computing. AMD expects users will benefit from greater battery life on the next-generation Turion platforms and greater enhancements with AMD Live! systems.
reported on ATI's chipset roadmap which outlined various integrated graphics and enthusiast products.
With the development of
and upcoming integrated AMD platforms, it is unknown what will happen to NVIDIA’s chipset business, which currently relies mainly on AMD chipset sales.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/25/2006 8:21:31 AM
You have to be kidding. I think my wallet is about to become a source of fusion.
Think about it. I used to buy a mid range vid card and processor. Then upgrade my vid card 2 years later. I still got decent play rates on a budget at 1024X 768 for the last few years now (excepting oblivion)with AMD. Now this is two full upgrades at possibly more price.
This is not Timna or the attempt by Cryix for a budget all in one processor ( I cannot recall the name).
Market share is all. Has AMD only recently forgotten about Dell and price/performance? God Help us all.
RE: Less Price/Workstation?
10/25/2006 9:35:28 AM
You so sure on that? We don't know what the purpose of these potential SoC (System-on-Chip) solutions are (at least, with moving everything onto one die, that's what the obvious path that this is going to would be). Typically, SoC designs have not catered to the bleeding edge, and I'm sure this one probably won't either. However, these do have some interesting applications for thin clients, embedded systems (i.e. cell phones and PDAs), workstations, and budget to mid-range consumer PCs.
RE: Less Price/Workstation?
10/25/2006 1:51:54 PM
I am sure enough to bet on the following.
1) When Fusion comes out, it is not a “low end” only solution comparable to current day IGP.
2) That the product satisfies all primary functions of today CPU and GPU. Secondary functions such as physics processing, hypertransport type bus support/links etc may well be merged, but I am talking about current basic operating functions.
3) That comparable to Intel offerings, there is no benefit price/performance wise over the product life of the computer it is installed in.
This is a business prediction, not technology (though the two are hugely interrelated in this industry). AMD is expecting increased market share due to this and is already planning on exploiting it. You would not make an announcement targeting the “synergy” of these two companies by going after the low end market. Granted there is a lot of volume and reliable profit, but ATI already has the lion’s share of this.
This is about increased profit margins due to market share.
What is the wager?
"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes
Farewell ATI: AMD Acquisition Completed Today
October 25, 2006, 4:46 AM
ATI AMD Chipset Roadmap Detailed
October 9, 2006, 12:30 PM
AMD and ATI Promise Unified Development by 2008
July 24, 2006, 8:11 AM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information