Print 34 comment(s) - last by Wwhat.. on Oct 26 at 10:31 PM

Microsoft rolls out the final version of its anti-spyware utility

Microsoft has released the final version of its Windows Defender anti-spyware utility. The program has been in beta for the past two years and is now available for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

Windows Defender is a product of the Microsoft acquisition of GIANT Software. The December 16, 2004 acquisition resulted in the first iteration of the software, Windows AntiSpyware, which was a thinly veiled copy of GIANT’s AntiSpyware. Over the past two years, numerous updates have been made to the utility along with the name change to Windows Defender.

Windows Defender incorporates Real-Time Protection to monitor systems for spyware activity, automated spyware removal with scheduled scans, full integration with Internet Explorer 7.0 and automatic spyware definition updates from Microsoft.

Windows Defender is available freely to all customers running a genuine copy of Windows. Microsoft has also announced that customers will each be allowed to report two support incidents for free with Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

With Symantec having already reported Microsoft to the European Union for anti-trust violations over its Kernel PatchGuard protection in Vista, there's no telling how Symantec and McAfee feel about Microsoft offering a free anti-spyware utility.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By cornfedone on 10/25/2006 8:45:27 AM , Rating: -1
MICROSUCKS is up to the same old tricks that got them in trouble with anti-trust laws... Give away the basic defective software then six months from now start charging people for an O/S and software "fix" after Offender corrupts peoples PC. Evidently MICROSUCKS just loves litigation.

By masteraleph on 10/25/2006 8:57:14 AM , Rating: 2

I don't even know what you're referring to. MS isn't going to charge people for Defender, that's pretty plain. They are charging for OneCare, because if they don't, they'll be sued.

What exactly is your point?

By peternelson on 10/25/2006 1:21:18 PM , Rating: 2
Can you contrast between OneCare and defender?

If onecare IS to be chargeable, I'd rather it be offered as a one-off fee (maybe optional extra with the OS) rather than ongoing monthly billing.

"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki