backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by Wwhat.. on Oct 26 at 10:31 PM

Microsoft rolls out the final version of its anti-spyware utility

Microsoft has released the final version of its Windows Defender anti-spyware utility. The program has been in beta for the past two years and is now available for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

Windows Defender is a product of the Microsoft acquisition of GIANT Software. The December 16, 2004 acquisition resulted in the first iteration of the software, Windows AntiSpyware, which was a thinly veiled copy of GIANT’s AntiSpyware. Over the past two years, numerous updates have been made to the utility along with the name change to Windows Defender.

Windows Defender incorporates Real-Time Protection to monitor systems for spyware activity, automated spyware removal with scheduled scans, full integration with Internet Explorer 7.0 and automatic spyware definition updates from Microsoft.

Windows Defender is available freely to all customers running a genuine copy of Windows. Microsoft has also announced that customers will each be allowed to report two support incidents for free with Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

With Symantec having already reported Microsoft to the European Union for anti-trust violations over its Kernel PatchGuard protection in Vista, there's no telling how Symantec and McAfee feel about Microsoft offering a free anti-spyware utility.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why pay to avoid something?
By Wwhat on 10/25/2006 1:37:26 AM , Rating: 2
Have you ever read (at least some of) the 'vunerability detail' microsoft put several clicks and popupwindows away on its updates?
Ever read how deep the bugs go, how messy windows is.
Yes I'm sure the protection bit and sandboxes help, but if we'd all used sandboxes then all virusses would not only break right through that but even use it against us.
Also as microsoft admitted itself by fixing it in vista the useraccount system in XP is way too primitive, if you aren't admin you're spending all day running stuff in admin usermode credentials to get most programs to run because 60% of windows programs require admin access for one reason or another, sigh.


RE: Why pay to avoid something?
By Wwhat on 10/25/2006 1:44:20 AM , Rating: 2
BTW almost every fix for vunerabilities says as mitigating circumstances "an attacker would have to get you to visit a site" or "you have to be connected to internet to be affected", and that also makes me raise an eyebrow in amusement, who the hell doesn't visit sites and isn't connected to the internet nowadays.


RE: Why pay to avoid something?
By stmok on 10/25/2006 11:54:56 AM , Rating: 2
My comment is mainly about reducing the most common causes of infection and compromise. I have no way implied its some "invincible magic potion". (I'm actually trying to use principles I've learnt in Linux...Things like access control, SELinux, PaX, Smash Stack Protection, etc). Obviously it helps, but to some extent. Windows is clearly a different ball game compared to other OSs.

Yes, I'm well aware of how messy Windows is. I did have access to the source code at one time in the past. If you can think the concept of "herding ants", that pretty much explains how bad the code is. In layman's terms, its a "f**king mess". (as one of my professors put it).



"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki