Print 27 comment(s) - last by Clauzii.. on Oct 9 at 9:07 PM

The new planet discoveries were made thanks to the NASA Hubble Space Telescope

Astronomers have announced that the NASA Hubble Space Telescope has spotted a number of extra-solar planets deep in the Milky Way.  The discovery was made during the Sagittarius Window Eclipsing Extrasolar Planet Search, also known as SWEEPS.  The light of 180,000 stars were monitored over one week to try and see any dimming that would occur from the passing of a planet.  The newly discovered bodies are at least 10 times as far from Earth as the more than 200 planets already discovered outside of our solar system.


 The 16 planet candidates are orbiting numerous stars in the central region of the Milky Way galaxy.  Calculations have shown that at least seven of the bodies can easily qualify as planets.  One of planet candidates circles close enough to its star that the planet’s surface temperature is more than 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit.  As many as five of the newly discovered planets are able to orbit their home stars in less than a day – one of them is able to do it in 10 hours, according to astronomers.  The fastest planet in our solar system, Mercury, is able to orbit around the Sun in 88 days.


None of the planet candidates can be confirmed as planets until the NASA James Webb Space Telescope is launched in 2013.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Are they liveable :?
By throughhyperspace on 10/5/2006 12:11:42 PM , Rating: 2
It would be much more cost effective to build to habitable environment on the moon or Mars.. Granted, it would be nice to walk outside the biodome without a space suite and not have to worry about your lungs getting sucked out. But to my knowledge we don't even know of any planets that are earth-like yet. The only ones we can "see" (through indirect methods) are jupiter-sized. Once that new telescope is operational we should have a plethora of new discoveries.
Furthermore, by the time we have to leave earth, space propulsion technology should be leaps and bounds beyond what we presently have, making a light-years journey much more feasible. Unless, of course, we nuke ourselves into extinction, which would not allow us the time to leave earth's atmosphere anyways. :)

RE: Are they liveable :?
By COMMENT999 on 10/5/06, Rating: 0
RE: Are they liveable :?
By Ratwar on 10/5/2006 1:07:14 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, taking care of our own planet environmentally ain't gonna do anything against a comet or asteriod... Gobal Warming isn't the only thread to human existance you know.

RE: Are they liveable :?
By Wwhat on 10/7/2006 4:22:15 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah I'm sure that if an object hits the earth big enough to destroy it or we have time and resources to build a spacefleet that can travel for lightyears, sure sure.
Same for a nuclear war that destroys half the planet.

New condition: SG1 syndrome, the believe any global disaster can be fixed in 30 minutes by about 5 or so people ;)

RE: Are they liveable :?
By Myrandex on 10/5/2006 1:36:09 PM , Rating: 4
I recommend taking in your CAPS lock key for immediately servicing. If you check underneath your keyboard, the Check Engine light is probably red, or else a nice bright blue meaning that attention is needed for the above mentioned key.

RE: Are they liveable :?
By Clauzii on 10/9/2006 9:05:20 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Are they liveable :?
By Etsp on 10/5/2006 5:17:18 PM , Rating: 2
so... you hear any news recently about north korea doing nuclear testing? if that happens then there may very well be a threat of global thermo-nuclear war in the not-so-distant future. in comparison, a few planes arent hurting much...

and if i recall, planes and the jet engines are far more energy efficient than standard internal combustion engines IE cars. please dont try to preach about that which you've only based your opinions on what you heard someone else preach about. get some facts from multiple sources and try to add a few tracks to that mind of yours.

RE: Are they liveable :?
By AxemanFU on 10/5/2006 5:30:06 PM , Rating: 1
In other news...The sky has fallen and it can't get up.

We can burn everything in sight at the same time, and the global temp would limit out at about 10-15F higher than it is today because of self limiting factors. Sure, the planet would look alot different, but it would still be quite habitable. Once greenhouse gasses reach a certain density with Earth's atmosphere's chemical makeup, the upper layers filter or reflect or absorb enough solar energy to prevent much of it from reaching the lower layers in many radiation bands, ultimately limiting the potential warming. Global warming, whatever the cause, can't destroy earth, life on it, or even mankind, though it can make it harder to live on earth. It would eventually happen naturally due to our cyclical exposure to varying amounts of solar radiation and other random geological evens like supereruptions of volcanic regions like the Yellowstone area, or a comet strike. Hell, we could all get randomly blasted with massive radiation from an unexpected supernovae we'd never see coming at the speed of light.

Also, global cooling, contrary to global warming, absolutely could virtually end life on the planet, as it almost all depends on liquid water. Even then deep ocean vents would preserve life at those locations.

Let science do the work, and keep the emotional parenoia in check.

"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher
Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki