AMD Q4'06 Dual-Core Roadmap
Anh Tuan Huynh
October 3, 2006 8:23 AM
comment(s) - last by
AMD September 2006 Roadmap. 65nm processors with a * are slated to sample in December 2006
AMD leaks its 4x4 plans
AMD has leaked its newest roadmaps to press, and
has received a new refresh outlining AMD’s upcoming dual-core plans. The major changes between the two roadmaps seem to be the addition of Socket-F FX processors, new 90nm processors and a shift in some of the 65nm processor bins.
previous June roadmap
, projections were estimated all the way out to Q3'07, but this refresh only contains outlook for the next two quarters. AMD’s Athlon 64 FX lineup will return to sharing a socket with AMD’s server and workstation Opteron lineup. Instead of using socket AM2 processors for
AMD’s 4x4 platform
there will be a switch to the land-grid-array Socket-F which may be disappointing to enthusiasts and gamers. AMD is specifically calling these new processors FX 2-P.
Three new 4x4 processors will arrive with the upcoming November launch of AMD’s enthusiast 4x4 platform. New Athlon Socket-F 64 FX processors include the FX-74, FX-72 and FX-70. These processors will be clocked at 3.0 GHz, 2.8 GHz and 2.6 GHz respectively. All three processors will have a 2x1MB L2 cache configuration and be based on AMD’s
core with a 2000 MHz Hyper Transport frequency. AMD rates the three processors with a 125 watt TDP. Features such as AMD64, NX Bit and Virtualization technologies are supported.
AMD’s mainstream dual-core lineup will receive a couple new updates as well. Also arriving in November will be new Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+, and 5400+. This will be AMD’s first new Athlon 64 X2 processor launch since the launch of the socket AM2 platform—
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ excluded
. These processors will have 3.0 GHz and 2.8 GHz clock speeds respectively.
Athlon 64 X2 models 6000+ and 5600+ will have a 2x1MB L2 cache configuration while the lower X2 5400+ will have a 2x512KB configuration. AMD rates the TDP for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ as 125 watts while the lower 5600+ and 5400+ receive 89 watt ratings. Availability is expected in November with no mention of Energy Efficient models.
AMD's 65nm processors received a small reorder; the 4600+ is gone, but AMD has added a new 5000+ chip instead. The 65nm chips are expected to sample in December 2006, with official shipments still slated for Q1'07.
Gone from AMD's roadmap are the FX-64 and FX-66 processors. Although
had very few details on these chips during the previous roadmap, it appears as though the chips may have just been renamed to the FX-"70" series. No pricing has been announced for the new FX-70s -- AMD has never released more than one FX series processor in a single launch. Typically the FX series CPUs are devoted to only a small audience with an extremely high price tag. Official pricing for the new processors was not revealed.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: 4X4 is just AMD's lame excuse to match kentsfield
10/4/2006 12:25:11 AM
If you buy two dual-core 4x4 CPUs now, what will you do when quad core parts come out?
Will you buy two new quad-core 4x4 CPUs? Okay. But what are you going to do with your old 4x4 CPUs? Throw them away? Who will buy them?
Who will buy two used, dual core CPUs, that they need a special 4x4 mobo for,
if they can just get an AM2 mobo and a quad-core CPU?
As soon as AMD's quad core parts come out, 4x4 with dual core CPUs will be
What can the enthusiast do? Throw their dual core CPUs in the trash and buy new quad core CPUs? Build a completely new system from scratch? Or suffer in silence while some n00b with a much cheaper single-socket system gets better FPS six months later? None of these are good options.
RE: 4X4 is just AMD's lame excuse to match kentsfield
10/8/2006 9:11:50 AM
There's a secondary market for just about anything. A 4x4 system is probably going to be a very capable computer for quite some time. If the quality was worth the selling price of the components then it shouldn't be an issue.
I do agree there is a problem in the primary market, but for different reasons. If you are just playing games, a quad core CPU isn't going to make a big difference anyway, not yet. It will help with video, 3D and some other forms of graphics work.
"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher
AMD Quietly Releases Athlon 64 X2 5200+
September 6, 2006, 3:01 PM
AMD June 2006 Product Roadmap
July 6, 2006, 2:52 PM
AMD Announces 4x4 Enthusiast Platform
June 1, 2006, 12:23 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information