Intel Responds to AMD's "Torrenza"
September 27, 2006 9:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
Intel will open up its server platform
This week at IDF, Intel made an official announcement on its response to AMD's
technology. AMD made waves earlier this year when it announced that it would open up its Opteron platform to the industry, allowing other manufacturers to create and develop add-in components that communicate directly with the system processor and memory. Going beyond that, AMD also mentioned that
would allow companies to create accelerators or
co-processors that could be used directly in an Opteron socket
Intel said that like AMD, it also plans to open up its chipset platform technology. The move would be an unprecedented move for Intel, as it has been guarding its platform for the longest time. Intel's primary goal is to introduce an alternative to AMD's HyperTransport. The technology would allow devices to communicate on a much faster pathway than PCI Express alone could muster. Interfacing directly with the front-side bus (FSB), devices will be able to communicate directly to the processor and or other accelerators. Non-Intel chips will be able to plug into a Xeon socket for example, and work parallel to the main processor or processors.
With the introduction of an open FSB platform, Intel will also be making a move towards integrating memory controllers directly onto processors. This is something that AMD has been doing for several years with the original Opteron processor.
previously reported that
a number of large companies were already partnering with AMD to create accelerator
and other co-processors. The decision to open up its platform has propelled AMD into the enterprise market in very large way. It will be interesting to see what Intel's move into an open space will do for the industry.
Currently, the technology is expected to be introduced sometime in the next one to one and a half years. Some analysts speculate that Intel will show off an open FSB specification in 2008 on Itanium, and on the Xeon sometime in 2009. Reports say that Intel is currently working with several companies to create co-processors -- they too would be able to plug directly into a Xeon or Itanium socket.
This week, Intel also announced several updates to its product family. The first being that
will now be called Core 2 Quad
, which it
promised to ship one million units before AMD could ship a single one
. Other interesting developments from Intel include
two new 45nm fab locations
as well as a strong push into
tera-flop computing research
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: AMD's solution is superior and it's now, not 2009
9/28/2006 5:54:49 PM
I work for a PC distributor, and my big problem with Intel is their chipsets. Take a look at Intel's site to see what CPUs work with what motherboards. Socket 775 has been around for about a year now, and its STILL almost impossible to tell what board will work with what processor. Like the difference between the 630 and 631 processor. Alot of the lower end boards will *not* work with the 631. Same thing with the D940. When they went to the D945, it wouldn't work with all of the 945 chipsets like the D940 did. We are constantly pulling our hair out over this crap when we try to configure systems for our customers. I don't care about who has the absolute fastest performance because most of the time you either don't need whatever's the fastest. Processing power is moving so quickly, you'd have to be an obsessive jerk to try and get the absolute fastest thing out there, which I'll admit is Core 2 Duo.
But take AMD. They have a good range of chips still available (single core Intel chips are getting to be a bitch to find) and they have a great unified socket. You take *any* AM2 chip and it's going to work on *any* AM2 board. AMD has even said that with on-chip memory controllers AM3 processors will work on AM2 boards. Holy hell! Think about that! A next generation processor that you can use without having to replace your whole machine??? I'll take AM2 any day over Intel. Plus, they're AMD, they'll gain back whatever lead they lost in terms of processing speed.
With that in mind, think about why Dell decided to go with AMD processors. I'm sure that part of the decision was that their kit designers bitched about how hard it was to configure an Intel system compared to an AMD, and the execs just broke down and gave in to their demands.
RE: AMD's solution is superior and it's now, not 2009
9/28/2006 10:02:12 PM
Well said. Despite Intel's deep pockets and plethora of resources they are either too dumb or too arrogant to simplify things for the consumer.
Intel reminds me of the US government, all these Ivy Leauge educated people running the show yet they are some of the dumbest people on the planet.
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
Intel Pledges 1M Quad-Cores Before AMD Ships 1
September 27, 2006, 12:13 PM
Intel Shows Off Teraflop-on-a-Chip
September 26, 2006, 2:49 PM
Intel Talks 45nm Production
September 26, 2006, 2:19 PM
Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad
September 26, 2006, 1:53 PM
AMD Announces Socket Compatibility Plans to Drive Industry Collaboration
September 21, 2006, 12:21 PM
Report: AT&T Eyeing $40B DirecTV Purchase
May 1, 2014, 8:00 AM
WebOS Class Action Settlement Costs HP $57 Million
April 1, 2014, 10:22 AM
IBM Workers Strike Over Terms of Deal That Will Have Them Working for Lenovo
March 6, 2014, 9:29 AM
Google Picking Up Artificial Intelligence Company "DeepMind" for $400 Million
January 27, 2014, 9:25 AM
Quick Note: Qualcomm Grabs up Palm, IPAQ, and Bitfone Patent Portfolio from HP
January 24, 2014, 9:18 AM
Verizon Buys Intel Media OnCue Cloud TV assets
January 21, 2014, 10:26 AM
Most Popular Articles
Facebook Will Force Android, iOS Users to Use Messenger App This Week
July 29, 2014, 11:26 AM
Sony's Xperia Z3 Gets Detailed in Leaked Photos
July 25, 2014, 2:30 PM
Ford's Extensive Use of Aluminum in '15 F-150 Results in $395 Increase for Base Models
July 28, 2014, 3:02 PM
Report: Apple to Launch 12" Retina MacBook Air, 4K Desktop Product Later this Year
July 24, 2014, 4:33 AM
Pentagon's Priciest Project, F-35, Misses International Debut
July 25, 2014, 10:18 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information