Print 44 comment(s) - last by Spivonious.. on Oct 2 at 1:31 PM

Intel will open up its server platform

This week at IDF, Intel made an official announcement on its response to AMD's Torrenza technology. AMD made waves earlier this year when it announced that it would open up its Opteron platform to the industry, allowing other manufacturers to create and develop add-in components that communicate directly with the system processor and memory. Going beyond that, AMD also mentioned that Torrenza would allow companies to create accelerators or co-processors that could be used directly in an Opteron socket.

Intel said that like AMD, it also plans to open up its chipset platform technology. The move would be an unprecedented move for Intel, as it has been guarding its platform for the longest time. Intel's primary goal is to introduce an alternative to AMD's HyperTransport. The technology would allow devices to communicate on a much faster pathway than PCI Express alone could muster. Interfacing directly with the front-side bus (FSB), devices will be able to communicate directly to the processor and or other accelerators. Non-Intel chips will be able to plug into a Xeon socket for example, and work parallel to the main processor or processors.

With the introduction of an open FSB platform, Intel will also be making a move towards integrating memory controllers directly onto processors. This is something that AMD has been doing for several years with the original Opteron processor. DailyTech previously reported that a number of large companies were already partnering with AMD to create accelerator and other co-processors. The decision to open up its platform has propelled AMD into the enterprise market in very large way. It will be interesting to see what Intel's move into an open space will do for the industry.

Currently, the technology is expected to be introduced sometime in the next one to one and a half years. Some analysts speculate that Intel will show off an open FSB specification in 2008 on Itanium, and on the Xeon sometime in 2009. Reports say that Intel is currently working with several companies to create co-processors -- they too would be able to plug directly into a Xeon or Itanium socket.

This week, Intel also announced several updates to its product family. The first being that Kentsfield will now be called Core 2 Quad, which it promised to ship one million units before AMD could ship a single one. Other interesting developments from Intel include two new 45nm fab locations as well as a strong push into tera-flop computing research.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

They're serious now...
By Beh on 9/28/2006 12:36:39 AM , Rating: 2
I guess Intel doesnt get serious until they start to lose sales. Where's the innovation without competition?

I love capitalism.

RE: They're serious now...
By nerdye on 9/28/2006 1:18:40 AM , Rating: 2
I agree entirely, the netburst architecture was very expensive and underperforming the a64 up until the core 2 duo on the desktop came out just recently (yet the intel northwood was burly, and mobile is a different beast of course). Intel seemed quite intent on selling p4's so long as they would sell, but amd put a small fork in the road of their plans. Now I don't doubt the power of money in research and development in the cpu department as we watch intel dominate with conroe, and the expectations of quad core in nov 2006. We watch intel benefit from 65nm and prepare for 45nm as we sit idle waiting for the peoples champ, amd to return to performance greatness, it must start with a smaller manufacturing process...

RE: They're serious now...
By Tsuwamono on 9/28/2006 7:39:38 AM , Rating: 1
I believe AMD may have dropped the ball a few months ago when they saw conroes preliminary benchmarks. Im sure right now they are all working on something to counter conroe and probably kick the crap out of it since AMD seems almost to have a personality in these kinds of things. I think AMD is going to wait alittle bit longer so they can out do intel by the same margin or higher that conroe out did the A64 single cores.

RE: They're serious now...
By ShapeGSX on 9/28/2006 8:58:54 AM , Rating: 2
It takes years to design a microprocessor. And it usually takes a year to go from tape-out to a chip that can be shipped.

If you get caught off-guard by a competitor in this business, your reaction to that will come at least 2 (if you already have a good design to work from) to 3 years later.

That is why good processor road maps are so important.

Intel was clearly caught off guard by K8. Look at how long it took them to come back with a solid competitor.

K8L is essentially a finished product. And it was very close to finished when the Conroe benchmarks started coming out, too close to have been affected by the Conroe news. If AMD was truly caught off guard, AMD's reaction to Conroe can't be K8L. This is not to say that K8L can't compete with Conroe, of course. It may indeed.

Of course, Conroe is still in its infancy. :)

RE: They're serious now...
By ajfink on 9/28/2006 3:25:45 PM , Rating: 2
AMD has already announced that it has completed the primary design phase of the architecture that is going to completely replace the K8 line. That was months ago, in fact. However, we won't see that for years.

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA
Related Articles
Intel Pledges 1M Quad-Cores Before AMD Ships 1
September 27, 2006, 12:13 PM
Intel Shows Off Teraflop-on-a-Chip
September 26, 2006, 2:49 PM
Intel Talks 45nm Production
September 26, 2006, 2:19 PM
Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad
September 26, 2006, 1:53 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki