backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by marscay.. on Sep 25 at 4:04 PM

Intel puts pressure on Taiwan mobo companies about RD600 chipset and NVIDIA's C19 nForce 590 SLI Intel Edition faces uncertain future

The future of Intel Core 2 based chipsets is uncertain right now as the industry is shaken up by various new business projects, such as the merger between AMD and ATI.

The word in Taiwan, where I live and run my site TweakTown.com, is that the high-anticipated ATI RD600 Conroe chipset is only going to be provided by one motherboard manufacturer, DFI. According to my sources, Intel has been putting pressure on Taiwan motherboard companies not to produce RD600 based motherboards. DFI stood up to the Intel giant and mentioned to us that they’ll be the only company providing an RD600 board, the DFI Lanparty RD600. This seems like a real disappointment for ATI as RD600 was set to be a bigger seller for the Canadian company with FSB speeds set to reach 480MHz and above – much higher than 975X and the C19 nForce 590 SLI Intel Edition chipset. DFI’s Lanparty RD600 motherboard will be on shop shelves sometimes next month but we’re not sure on an exact date yet.

We’ve also been hearing reports about the upcoming nForce 590 SLI Intel Edition chipset for Core 2 processors. This chipset is based on the now aging NVIDIA C19 chipset which some Taiwan motherboard manufactures are not impressed with. In fact, NVIDIA recently issued an announcement to motherboard companies saying that the C19 chipset will be phased out very soon and replaced by the newer and more refined C55 chipset in October. The C19 chipset maxes out at around 350MHz FSB which is one of the main reasons the Taiwanese folk were not impressed with the chipset, especially the companies interested in producing highly overclockable boards – and that’s most companies these days. With Intel’s P965 chipset, while not as fast as 975X, we’ve seen reports of the FSB hitting the 500MHz FSB mark. There are no official testing numbers on C55 FSB overclocking but being a refined chipset using newer technology, it is expected to beat the older C19 easily.

New Conroe motherboards using either the RD600 or nForce 590 SLI Intel Edition were expected this month (as first reported here on TweakTown) but users wanting to move away from Intel chipset solutions will need to wait another few weeks for these boards to be ready, possibly longer as BIOS’s are tweaked.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Better FSB and more stability
By FXi on 9/6/2006 10:36:01 PM , Rating: 2
There are huge threads on the 590 chipset and the serious dissappointment it represents. The FSB clocking his awful, even the great top end mobo makers couldn't tweak it for much more than 350 FSB. Worse, and I've been hearing this from a lot of OEM testers, overclock it even a small bit and the stability is seriously bad. Early testers have blown hardrives right and left, on simple BSOD's and just about no one thinks the option of SLI is worth dealing with these problems.

Nvidia needs a far better clocking FSB-wise, and they need to deeply and significantly address stability and data safety at the same time. The 965 and the 975 overclock with ease. They recover from a bad clock 99.9% of the time without damage to the system itself. This is the arena that Nvidia has to compete in to succeed. They have to offer SLI AND do all the 975 and 965 can as well. And as long as they fail to do this correctly, they'll lose. People want SLI (and heck it SHOULD BE MADE TO WORK ON THE 975 BECAUSE IT WILL SELL MORE GPU'S DUH NVIDIA). But people want to clock well and without having to reconstruct their system (even image recoveries take time) or reinstall the OS.

This is a market you helped to flourish Nvidia. It's time you made a much bigger step up to the plate.




"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner

Related Articles
AMD-ATI: A Done Deal
July 24, 2006, 5:00 AM



Latest By Cameron Wilmot
What's Up with Future "Conroe" Chipsets?
September 5, 2006, 2:17 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki