backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by hstewarth.. on Sep 2 at 10:17 AM

Netburst still has life left in it

Intel has officially released its 65nm Tulsa core Xeon 7100 series processors. The dual-core processors are based on Intel’s Netburst architecture and will drop into existing LGA771 motherboards. Intel is catering the Xeon 7100 series to multi-processor servers. The new Xeon 7100 series has new features such as up to 16MB of shared L3 cache and Intel Virtualization Technology. DailyTech previously reported details of Intel’s Tulsa.

Eight Tulsa core Xeon 7100 models are available with varying cache sizes of 16MB, 8MB and 4MB. Xeon 7100 models also have varying front-side bus speeds of 800 MHz and 667 MHz. Two different models with different thermal data power ratings of 95W and 150W are available. The Xeon 7100M models will have 150 watt TDPs while the 7100N models will have 95 watt thermal envelopes.

Intel Xeon 7100 series processors are available from 2.5 GHz to 3.4 GHz. Pricing starts at $856 for the lower Xeon 7110N and tops out at $1,980 for the top of the line Xeon 7140M model. Servers based on Intel Xeon 7100 series processors are expected from the likes of Dell, HP and IBM.  



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 16MB = awful latency
By mino on 8/30/2006 1:46:39 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah,
Intel
PIII generation 2 desktop physical slots/sockets -> 4 different electrical specs
P4 generation 3 desktop physical sockets -> 7! different electrical specs
Core generation 1 desktop physical socket -> 1 electrical spec

AMD
K7 generation 2 desktop physical slots/sockets -> 3 different electrical specs
K8 generation 2 desktop physical sockets -> 2! different electrical specs
1 server/FX physical socket - borrowed form server space
K8 DDR2 gener. 1 desktop physical socket -> 1 electrical spec

sumarized:
Intel: 6 sockets/12 platforms
AMD: 5(6)sockets/6(7) platforms

s940 was never a real desktop socket so it should not be considered(940 custemers got pretty long upgrade path on Opteron line inmstead FX's)


RE: 16MB = awful latency
By mino on 8/30/2006 1:49:22 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry for (un)readability.
I forgot that the editing system will screw the spacing :(


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Related Articles
16MB of L3 Cache: Intel's "Tulsa"
May 28, 2006, 7:12 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki