Print 81 comment(s) - last by MrCoyote.. on Sep 1 at 11:44 AM

Orion Crew Exploratin Vehicle - Image courtesy NASA

Orion Logo - Image courtesy
Project Orion will land Americans back on the moon by 2020

NASA made officially announced the name of its moon vehicle yesterday -- a week ahead of schedule. The reason for the early reveal was because an American astronaut on the international space station let the name slip over an open radio channel. "We've been calling it the crew exploration vehicle for several years, but today it has a name... Orion," said astronaut Jeffrey Williams. NASA officials denied the Orion name shortly after the leak, but later confirmed the name.

It should be noted that the name "Orion" will be the official project name for NASA's missions to the international space station and to the moon. Orion will also be the name of the four-man crew exploration vehicle (reminiscent of the old Apollo capsule). The Orion capsule is 16.5 feet in diameter and has a mass of 25 tons. It also has 2.5 the internal volume of the old Apollo capsules.

"Many of its stars have been used for navigation and guided explorers to new worlds for centuries. Our team, and all of NASA - and, I believe, our country - grows more excited with every step forward this program takes. The future for space exploration is coming quickly," said Orion Project Manager Skip Hatfield.

Orion will succeed the space shuttle as NASA's primary astronaut ferry and its first flight will take place before 2014. Orion's first trip to the moon should take place no later than 2020. If Orion does touchdown on the moon by 2020, it would represent a 50 year spread since the first time an American stepped foot on our nearest neighbor in space.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Back?
By rushfan2006 on 8/30/2006 11:18:49 AM , Rating: 2
No, the Comm Sat was CONCEIVED by Dr. Clarke...just as the helicopter was conceived by Leonardo Da Vinci. I don't think we can credit either one of them (no matter how brilliant their concepts were) with the creation of the actual product.

The Comm sat wasn't developed or conceived by NASA, you are correct that Dr. Clarke is more correctly stated as the "conceiver" but my only point to begin with is still valid -- which is NASA wasn't responsible for the first sat. It wasn't hard for me to find that information either, which is why I'm a little shocked that you state otherwise.

It was the contracts for NASA that produced them, just as any major corporation that hires an R&D team for a project is responsible for the development of that discovery...

You are wrong sir, I'm not going to go back and forth for eternity with you here however I couldn't let false information stand. NASA contracts had nothing to do with the creation of either Teflon (OF ANY FLAVOR btw), the sat (as above), or transistors (which I know you corrected yourself on already, just putting it here for my point)..that's three things on your list that you state rather plainly so how can you say that's not what you meant, that you claim where direct results of NASA contracts that is dead wrong...PERIOD.

PFE teflon was not SOLELY used by NASA and NASA was not the first user of it -- so then how could a contract by NASA be responsible for its creation? Likewise the same goes for the satellite, how can a company (agency actually) who didn't have anything to do with the first one's production be credited with "Well it was NASA contracts that made it happen"....that's just absurd. That's what I mean...NASA played major rules with getting the sats UP THERE...and I never denied that part....but don't say their contracts made it possible for these things.

Your point was understood by me though, believe it or not I AGREE WITH YOU. The space program is critically important for the research and development of products, medicines and just the pure discovery of knowledge that can only be had with a space program......

But just like I can't let Al Gore take credit for the Internet, I'm not gonna let someone else give credit to someone/or some other organization for the creation of something that they don't deserve cred for.

It's that simple...I'm not in a contest or anything with you, just merely pointing out the facts of history nothing more, nothing less.

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki