Print 81 comment(s) - last by MrCoyote.. on Sep 1 at 11:44 AM

Orion Crew Exploratin Vehicle - Image courtesy NASA

Orion Logo - Image courtesy
Project Orion will land Americans back on the moon by 2020

NASA made officially announced the name of its moon vehicle yesterday -- a week ahead of schedule. The reason for the early reveal was because an American astronaut on the international space station let the name slip over an open radio channel. "We've been calling it the crew exploration vehicle for several years, but today it has a name... Orion," said astronaut Jeffrey Williams. NASA officials denied the Orion name shortly after the leak, but later confirmed the name.

It should be noted that the name "Orion" will be the official project name for NASA's missions to the international space station and to the moon. Orion will also be the name of the four-man crew exploration vehicle (reminiscent of the old Apollo capsule). The Orion capsule is 16.5 feet in diameter and has a mass of 25 tons. It also has 2.5 the internal volume of the old Apollo capsules.

"Many of its stars have been used for navigation and guided explorers to new worlds for centuries. Our team, and all of NASA - and, I believe, our country - grows more excited with every step forward this program takes. The future for space exploration is coming quickly," said Orion Project Manager Skip Hatfield.

Orion will succeed the space shuttle as NASA's primary astronaut ferry and its first flight will take place before 2014. Orion's first trip to the moon should take place no later than 2020. If Orion does touchdown on the moon by 2020, it would represent a 50 year spread since the first time an American stepped foot on our nearest neighbor in space.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Back?
By stromgald on 8/24/2006 4:00:27 PM , Rating: 2
There is water on the Moon. Using solar energy, water can be easily split into Hydrogen and Oxygen, which our most efficient bipropllant rockets run on. If done correctly, the moon can be a refueling station before the trip to Mars, which means smaller tanks, which leads to less weight, which leads to lower cost to get everything in orbit. Unfortunately, due to the schedule Bush put out, NASA has axed the idea of stopping by the moon for refueling before going to Mars . . . at least the first time around.

RE: Back?
By jon1003 on 8/24/2006 5:34:50 PM , Rating: 2
This is not political, but:

The @$*$'ed up thing is having ANY politician who knows little to nothing about science and technology making these decisions about timelines and exactly how scientists should get to mars.

RE: Back?
By TheDoc9 on 8/25/2006 4:56:53 PM , Rating: 2
I guess it's because the cost doesn't justify doing it. Just a ballpark figure here, but a station on the moon would probably cost 500 BILLION dollars or more. It's called pork, and it has to be cut from the budget.

RE: Back?
By Wwhat on 8/26/2006 1:19:29 AM , Rating: 2
Want to place a bet that NASA will fail to get to the moon this time? Let alone do something as ambitious as setting up plants, this is reality not a tv show and things are not as simple as all that.

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki