Print 53 comment(s) - last by RMSe17.. on Sep 26 at 11:56 PM

Four 2.66GHz Intel CPUs on a single package for just a grand

Intel's newest roadmap started making the rounds last week, and the headline title across the roadmap was absolutely Kentsfield, Intel's upcoming quad-core processor.  During last month's investor call, Intel CEO Paul Otellini announced the chips would be shipping this year, as opposed to Q1'07 that was originally slated on the roadmap.

Now a few additional details of Kentsfield have slipped out.  Intel's most recent roadmap claims Kentsfield, which will ship as a Core 2 Extreme branded processor, will run each core at 2.66GHz and a 1066MHz front-side bus.  Essentially, the processor is two Core 2 Duo E6700 processors packaged onto a single CPU.

There is no announced ship date of Kentsfield yet, though Intel has announced that the processor will ship for $999 -- the same as every other "Extreme" processor the company has announced.  Intel has no price cuts for the E6700 processor planned until after the quad-core Kentsfield launch as well.  Since the E6700 has a distributor price of $530, the Kentsfield actually offers some discount for the second core.

Absentees from Intel's roadmaps include a 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme processor.  The company officially stated that such a processor would follow the existing 2.93GHz Core 2 Extreme that is available today.  However, it seems fairly evident that the quad-core Kentsfield has
supplanted any new dual-core Extreme processors.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Looks like it can be OC'd to 4.75GHz...
By therealnickdanger on 8/17/2006 10:03:13 AM , Rating: 2
RE: Looks like it can be OC'd to 4.75GHz...
By The Cheeba on 8/17/2006 10:22:48 AM , Rating: 2
Yep that sure seems practical! Nothing says useful, realworld testing like pooring $200 worth of chemicals over a CPU for 7 minutes of benchmarking!

RE: Looks like it can be OC'd to 4.75GHz...
By epsilonparadox on 8/17/2006 10:41:19 AM , Rating: 2
I seriously doubt that overclocking was ever used in the same sentence w/ practical.

RE: Looks like it can be OC'd to 4.75GHz...
By stmok on 8/17/2006 10:48:34 AM , Rating: 2
LOL! I think that's "extreme overclocking isn't practical for most of the audience out there".

You can't exactly rock up to your local K-mart and ask for a tank of LN2, can you? :)

I've always wondered how well an aircooled solution will do with an overclocked quad-core...(Assuming a good performing third-party HSF that offers room for some "moderate" overclocking). That's a much more practical approach for most people!

By Ringold on 8/17/2006 5:32:30 PM , Rating: 2
I consider it a wasted computer if it isn't watercooled with at least a small OC :)

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki