backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by OnyxNite.. on Aug 21 at 2:49 PM

VoLTE will enable higher quality, "HD Voice" calls

Voice over LTE (VoLTE) is making its way to U.S. carriers, and Verizon Wireless has announced plans to launch the service during the fourth quarter of 2014 according to Fran Shammo, Chief Financial Officer for Verizon Communications.
 
Voice calls will be routed through Verizon’s existing LTE network, with a fallback to 3G in the absence of LTE availability. With its LTE network nearly complete in the U.S., Verizon Wireless is confident that its service to consumers won’t buckle under the pressure of handling both VoLTE calls and LTE data.
 
"For us, when we launch a new technology, we have to make sure our quality is strong because the CDMA network was so strong," said Shammo at an investor conference this week. "We don't go before we know it's ready."
 
According to Fierce Wireless, 55 percent of Verizon Wireless’ customers have LTE devices, but those customers account for 79 percent of all data traffic on its network.
 
The move to VoLTE not only brings with it higher quality “HD Voice” calls, but it will also allow Verizon Wireless to completely abandon its 3G CDMA network in the future. Handsets would likely also be cheaper for manufacturers to produce if they don’t have to worry about supporting legacy CDMA functionality.
 
 
However, we still have a ways to go before you have to worry about your smartphone becoming incompatible with Verizon Wireless’ network. The company doesn’t plan to introduce its first LTE-only phones until 1H 2016, and it will be longer still before its 3G CDMA network is shuttered for good.
 
In the mean time, new smartphones that support VoLTE (while still having 3G CDMA fallback) will be introduced over the coming months, and existing smartphones [with VoLTE hardware support] will receive software updates to enable the feature. But even with network, hardware, and software support, placing or receiving a VoLTE call whenever you want isn’t guaranteed [at least until the wireless carrier goes LTE-only]. Verizon Wireless wrote earlier this year:
 
For a customer to make or receive a VoLTE call, both parties must have VoLTE-enabled devices and be in an area where VoLTE is available.  
 
Verizon Wireless currently has 42 million customers that are using 3G-only smartphones, and they will all have to upgrade to VoLTE capable phones in the coming years if they want to continue to receive voice/data service.

Source: Fierce Wireless





Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I'm sure
By GlobleWarmingisbunk on 8/12/2014 6:29:30 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Verizon has accepted billions in tax breaks... As far as I am concerned they can either return that money or do as the American public pleases.


You do realize that a tax brake is not money from the government, all a tax brake does is let the company keep more of its own money. So Verizon does not owe the government, or the American People anything. If you don't like what they are doing than don't use Verizon.


RE: I'm sure
By Zak on 8/13/2014 8:04:10 AM , Rating: 3
I don't know what "tax brake" is but "tax break" is money that would have been paid to the govt in taxes, i.e. missed tax revenue for the govt and the public, so yeah same thing. I'm sure you realized that, but just wanted to be obtuse for no apparent reason.


RE: I'm sure
By tayb on 8/13/2014 9:01:47 AM , Rating: 2
There is no difference between the two things you are describing. Verizon owed the US government billions in taxes and the US government said "build out a fiber network and you can keep that money." Verizon kept the money and then didn't build out the fiber network.

As far as I am concerned Verizon should either pay those taxes, deliver the networks as promised, or forfeit control of the corporation over to the American public. Pick one.


RE: I'm sure
By GeekWithFire on 8/13/2014 9:33:10 AM , Rating: 2
While I'm sure you and I will continue to disagree on who actually owns the money in this situation (I personally believe it is the organization who actually built something...yes, they did build that.), a tax break is a business transaction. If the US government didn't have any stipulations preventing Verizon from making this business decision, they are not entitled to anything. This process is how every other business entity in the free market operations. Why should the US government operate any differently?


“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads
Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki