backtop


Print 33 comment(s) - last by maroon1.. on Aug 14 at 2:03 PM

The Galaxy Alpha will reportedly come in 4.7" and 6.7" varieties

We’ve been hearing about Samsung’s metal-trimmed smartphone for quite some time, with pictures of the device popping up regularly around the web. Today, we’re getting some of best images of the devices to date along with a few more details on the new smartphone family.
 
The images show that the Galaxy Alpha sports chamfered edges like the iPhone 5/5S. The metal band wraps all the way around the sides of the smartphone, but the back of the device will still be made from plastic like all previous Galaxy designs.

 
We’ve already seen the 4.7” Galaxy Alpha in black — and here in white — but there will also be a larger 6.7” model according to The Verge and the Weibo forums.
 
Although we know nothing about the specs of the larger model, the 4.7” Galaxy Alpha is said to include a 720p display, fingerprint reader, 32GB of storage, and a Samsung Exynos processor.


All Images Courtesy Weibo Forums

Sources: Weibo, via The Verge



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A solid "meh"
By tayb on 8/4/2014 11:27:09 AM , Rating: 2
It's not really an urban legend but in reality it never works out that an internal battery is more powerful. In theory we should see a slight increase in battery capacity due to the slight increase in space by removing the door and thick battery casing. This should result in increased battery life. In reality the space saved is not used for a larger battery but for a smaller phone, thereby negating any potential battery life advantages.

I don't know what the potential space savings are but I would estimate somewhere around 5%. If that space were used to increase capacity by 5% there would absolutely be a benefit to going internal only. Unfortunately that 5% is usually just eaten up in order to have a slimmer phone.


RE: A solid "meh"
By bug77 on 8/4/2014 11:37:43 AM , Rating: 2
Even 5% is not something one would notice. It means that if a removable battery lasts 24 hours, a non-removable version would last 25 hours and 12 minutes. And that's a best case scenario.
In reality, all this non-removable trend is just supposed to force the customer to go to authorized battery changers and make them spend some more cash. As if you got the phone dirt-cheap to begin with and the manufacturer is just getting by.


RE: A solid "meh"
By karimtemple on 8/5/2014 10:58:15 AM , Rating: 3
I was talking about design focus. Better battery life is a better feature than removable battery. It wasn't really a comment about batteries. There are better ways to increase battery life than making the battery bigger (or removable).


RE: A solid "meh"
By Reclaimer77 on 8/4/2014 11:42:03 AM , Rating: 2
The door doesn't take up any space though or intrude into the internal compartment whatsoever. Why do people act like making the back of the phone removable somehow dictates the battery be smaller? This has never made sense to me.

Samsung and LG make flagships that are as thin or thinner, with class leading battery life. And the batteries are removable.

It absolutely IS an urban legend. One created by Apple fans probably, who cannot grasp the point in NOT always doing something the way Apple does it.


RE: A solid "meh"
By tayb on 8/4/14, Rating: -1
RE: A solid "meh"
By bug77 on 8/4/2014 1:12:00 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder what you mean by "fact", because the door on my old Desire S slides into place and does not take any extra space. See here (towards the bottom): http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_desire_s-review-590p2....
I don't have a picture of a section of a battery to show the casing of a battery, but since the SGS5 can pack a replaceable battery within 8.1mm, I'll take a wild guess and say it doesn't take a lot of space at all.


RE: A solid "meh"
By BillyBatson on 8/4/14, Rating: -1
RE: A solid "meh"
By jmunjr on 8/4/2014 3:16:53 PM , Rating: 2
I have three extra batteries, one of which is double the capacity of the OEM and comes with a bigger "door" to accommodate it, and it just so happens that extra bulk makes it a much easier phone to handle than the uber thin ones that exist today. Og an yeah the battery lasts twice as long..

Maybe I'm the minority but I do know others who have extra batteries as well. As for the dropping the phone issue, having the battery pop out is a good thing. If a phone can flex when dropped then there may be a lower chance of the screen cracking. Overly rigid phones result in more cracked screens. The iPhone comes to mind. I have dropped my Galaxy S Blaze onto hard floors at least 20-25 times and never a screen failure. I doubt most iphones can handle that.


RE: A solid "meh"
By ritualm on 8/4/2014 5:54:46 PM , Rating: 2
Are you drunk irl? Also you didn't turn on autocorrect in your iOS settings!
quote:
in th[e] end I would take a non-removable battery phone over one that's replaceable any day

/facepalm

My order of preference for batteries in phones:
1. removable
2. non-removable, but is user-replaceable
3. integrated (if the battery dies, replace the phone)
quote:
Build quality is one reason; a phone with a removable back will never be [quite] as sturdy.

Build quality and batteries are mutually exclusive.
quote:
I like knowing that if I drop my phone the back and battery will not pop out and that everything will still be running.

Funny, because only maybe 5-10% of all iPhone users I've seen in the wild use their phones naked. Everyone else uses a case, which completely defeats the reason to have integrated batteries.
quote:
Another reason is because even those with removable batteries almost NEVER purchase a spare battery to swap out to.

Yeah, I have one with a removable battery, and I don't buy a spare, why? Because the current battery in my GS4 is 2.8x the capacity of stock while retaining NFC (there are 3.0x ones that don't come with it). I don't need a spare.
quote:
I myself wouldn't have a place in my pocket to carry around a spare battery even if I had one.

What kind of pants do you wear, tight-fitting body-hugging jeans with tiny pockets? No wonder you needed an easy-to-lose bag to hold that 7.9" iPad!


RE: A solid "meh"
By flyingpants1 on 8/4/14, Rating: 0
RE: A solid "meh"
By syslog2000 on 8/4/2014 5:25:29 PM , Rating: 3
Agreed. Loving the gigantic, long lasting and totally replaceable battery on my shiny new LG G3 fondleslab.


RE: A solid "meh"
By retrospooty on 8/5/2014 8:11:16 AM , Rating: 2
LOL... fondleslab.

That reminds me, I need to bust out the bottle of alcohol and clean my G3


"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki