Print 47 comment(s) - last by retrospooty.. on Jul 9 at 12:09 AM

Windows Phone's "training wheels" may get a rebranding

Many have second guessed Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) decision to continue to support the Windows Phone-esque reskin of Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android, Nokia X.  Indeed Microsoft's logic seems somewhat peculiar given that you can get a pure Windows Phone device (e.g. the Lumia 520/521) for under $100 USD -- cheaper than most Nokia X handsets.
However, the Nokia X's pre-orders of 10 million in March (including 4 million in China) hints that in these markets the ability to load pirated apps via third-party app distributors and sideloading (a key "feature" of Android) can be worth at least $50 USD in effective device value.  If the flawed first generation Nokia X can sell like that, Microsoft is ready for a device boom with the more refined second generation Nokia X platform.
Amidst that backdrop top smartphone leaker @evleaks has posted some highly interesting news:
This is perhaps the culmination of rumors that Microsoft was considering adding the ability to use Android apps on Windows Phone (similar to BlackBerry Ltd.'s (TSE:BB) compatibility layer).

Nokia X2

Google is cracking down on reskinning.  With Android 4.4 KitKat, it moved many of its key APIs (which are required by many apps) into the proprietary part of Android, which is not available to (unlicensed) reskinners.  Since then it has flat-out banned reskinning of some variants of the "open source" Android code.  However, Google can't really stop rivals from achieving app compatibility with Android; after all, BlackBerry is already doing this.
Microsoft will likely be forced to continue to maintain an older version of Android if it wants to continue its strategy.  But what some don't seem to understand is that what Microsoft is doing is actually more than a little bit brilliant.
Neowin writes:

[F]or Microsoft to start offering Android-powered Lumias seems like a strange decision, if only for the purpose of undercutting its own OS.

But that comment is written from the mindset of an American consumer.  Nokia X -- perhaps soon to be rebranded as Lumia handsets -- indeed makes no sense from the perspective of the U.S. and European markets.  But the first-generation Nokia X didn't even ship to these markets.
Where Nokia X -- or Lumia Android -- makes perfect sense is in markets like China and India where any device that does not openly embrace piracy is condemned to a small niche market share (e.g. Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) "small" market share in China).
Nokia X
The latest iPhone saw only 1 million preorders in China; the Nokia X saw more than 4 million preorders in the region. [Image Source: Android265G]

Microsoft is a mass seller -- so it needs a device that can compete with pure Android competitors in these markets; it can't operate as a high-end boutique brand in these markets like Apple.  At the same time it would be unacceptable to weaken Windows Phone's piracy protections, as that would undermine Microsoft's growing success in Europe and the U.S. (where the ability to pirate is less of a "selling point").
With Nokia X Microsoft can have its cake (unit sales) and eat it to (by guiding the small minority of high end customers in these regions to true Windows Phone Lumias).
So for those who feel Nokia X doesn't make sense, remember -- it isn't meant to make sense to you.  Microsoft isn't selling these devices to you.  Nokia X -- and its potential Lumia successor -- is Microsoft's answer for gaining market share and introducing Windows Phone in developing markets where rampant piracy has left the laissez-faire Android without a true competitor.  In that context Microsoft's Android play might actually make sense.

Sources: @evleaks on Twitter, via Neowin

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bias is showing
By JasonMick on 7/7/2014 5:31:23 PM , Rating: 2
Apple is the dominant smart phone provider in China. About 100M users. That's a heck of a 'niche'. Some 80% of phones over $500 are Apple. There recent deal with China Mobile is huge, and driving huge sales of 5c/5s for them.

I am there frequently (hong kong, shenzen, shanghai mostly) what I see are fliphones, crappy small screen HTC thingies and tons, and tons, and tons of iPhones (and ipads)...
No, you're flat out wrong and crazy.

That's one metric... I would further debug your fallacious claims, but I'll simply rest my case with that adding that being in fifth place is actually an IMPROVEMENT for Apple (who last I saw in 2013 was in sixth place. That's smartphones not "flip phones"... so don't try to weasel your way out of this one.

You're flat out wrong to claim Apple is "dominant" in Chinese unit sales.

Apple is a niche player in China, albeit one that has seen modest success.

RE: Bias is showing
By Keeir on 7/7/2014 9:27:07 PM , Rating: 2
Talk about missing the forest for the trees.

Apple is not popular in China in terms of marketshare is because of COST. (Cost of device and cost of apps, etc)

The cheapest comparable option is a 16 GB 5c. Its listed currently on the Apple site as 4,488 RMB --> 718 dollars!

In the United States this phone is only 549 + tax. (Lets say 600). That's right, its cheaper to buy a 5S in the United States than a 5c in China.

In comparison the Nokia your specifically referring to in the article sells for 1188 RMB --> 190 dollars.

Now, I think that a cost difference of around 500 dollars matters significantly more than the ability to pirate. True the ability to pirate is worth a significant amount, but in pales in comparison to the base price.

I wonder among flagship phones (Cost in China of 3,500 RMB and above) what Apple's percentage is?

“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki