Print 40 comment(s) - last by degobah77.. on Jul 4 at 12:36 PM

Microsoft's wearable device is said to be priced around $200

Well-connected Microsoft reporter Paul Thurrott has some information on the Redmond, Washington-based company's rumored entry into the burgeoning market of wearable devices. Google has its Android Wear platform, Samsung has smartwatches based on Tizen and Apple is reportedly preparing its own “iWatch,” which will reportedly be revealed this fall.
Microsoft’s entry into the wearables market is said to provide “smartphone-based notifications” and will work with any major smartphone platform (Window Phone, Android, iOS, etc.) without any restrictions. In addition, Thurrott says that Microsoft’s device will be more of a wristband than an actual smartwatch, although it will provide a display that shows the current time.

The wearable device is also said to include a plethora of sensors to measure your heart rate, calories burned, and steps taken. The information gleaned from the wearable device would also interface with such Microsoft apps/services as Bing Health and Healthvault.
According to Thurrott, Microsoft’s latest hardware offering will be priced around $200 and will be available in Q4.

Sources: Paul Thurrott's Supersite for Windows, U.S. Patent Office

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By themaster08 on 7/3/2014 12:33:33 PM , Rating: 2
The VERGE is not Anandtech. They are just tech journalists, like those here at Daily Tech, writing juicy stories for clickbait. I wouldn't use them as a serious source personally.
Right, so the next time a source is cited, we'll be sure to get the Reclaimer stamp of approval. Got it. Besides, wasn't it you that concluded that Anand was an Apple homer?

Oh please, how many people want to do that? It ABSOLUTELY hurts Google when people don't have access to a YouTube app.
If it hurts Google as much as you claim, then why wouldn't they simply work with Microsoft in order to prevent the app from violating their ToS, instead of overtly using roadblocks such as preventing Microsoft access to the relevant APIs and forcing the use of HTML5?

If Google was going to take actions to overtly hurt anyone, why Windows Phone? Don't you think Apple, which has several times the marketshare and profits of Microsoft, would be a better target?
Because targeting Apple would be widely criticised. Preventing Windows Phone access to arguably one of the best apps on the platform can easily fly under the radar without much notice.

"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki