Print 58 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on Jun 18 at 1:55 PM

A new Samsung flagship is reportedly in the works

When the rumors about the Samsung Galaxy S5 first started raining down upon us, we were pelted with hopes of a metal body and a gorgeous QHD display. When the smartphone was officially announced, we were greeted with what was more evolution than revolution — that meant a slight bump in screen size to 5.1 inches, the same 1080p resolution, and a body that was still constructed primarily of plastic.

We’re now getting a few more glimpses of the next Samsung “flagship” with specs matching what people were first expecting with the Galaxy S5. The so-called Galaxy F will reportedly be announced in September according to serial leaker @evleaks.

Reports suggest that the Galaxy F will come equipped with a QHD (2560x1440) display like the LG G3, and will actually sport a full metal back (unlike the faux-metallic G3). There are also reports that a Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 processor will be onboard to provide not only faster processing speeds to fuel the QHD display, but also a fast onboard modem courtesy of the 225Mbps LTE-A Qualcomm MDM9635.

Source: Evleaks

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: no more Samsung
By themaster08 on 6/17/2014 1:58:11 AM , Rating: 3
Funny how you support Samsung's anti-competitive practices, yet you slam Micrsoft's past behaviour. You can't support one and be critical of the other. They're both anti-competitive and damaging to the market and end user.

Get your head out of Samsung's ass and your arguments might have at least a modicum of credibility.

RE: no more Samsung
By Reclaimer77 on 6/17/2014 9:49:50 AM , Rating: 2
I don't know that what Samsung did was "anti-competitive". And nobody has provided evidence that it was.

When you hold onto a believe in the face of all evidence, then you become a zealot. I have proven beyond a doubt that Apple manipulated the NAND market and left Samsung holding the bag. Samsung never intended to have that much a surplus of NAND on-hand.

The fact that all of you, even ritualm, has blatantly ignored this point and blindly presses on with the 'Samsung is teh evils' speeches, tells me you have an agenda.

They're both anti-competitive and damaging to the market and end user.

And as soon as you guys show me a single shred of evidence showing specifically how Samsung hurt consumers (we all know how much consumers HATE lower prices...) and the market, I'll listen.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki