backtop


Print 58 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on Jun 18 at 1:55 PM

A new Samsung flagship is reportedly in the works

When the rumors about the Samsung Galaxy S5 first started raining down upon us, we were pelted with hopes of a metal body and a gorgeous QHD display. When the smartphone was officially announced, we were greeted with what was more evolution than revolution — that meant a slight bump in screen size to 5.1 inches, the same 1080p resolution, and a body that was still constructed primarily of plastic.

 
We’re now getting a few more glimpses of the next Samsung “flagship” with specs matching what people were first expecting with the Galaxy S5. The so-called Galaxy F will reportedly be announced in September according to serial leaker @evleaks.

 
Reports suggest that the Galaxy F will come equipped with a QHD (2560x1440) display like the LG G3, and will actually sport a full metal back (unlike the faux-metallic G3). There are also reports that a Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 processor will be onboard to provide not only faster processing speeds to fuel the QHD display, but also a fast onboard modem courtesy of the 225Mbps LTE-A Qualcomm MDM9635.

Source: Evleaks



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: no more Samsung
By atechfan on 6/16/2014 4:58:50 PM , Rating: 2
You can't deny that Samsung has been guilty of anti-competitive practices. They have been found guilty of that more that once. But really, who cares? If I were a shareholder, and those anti-competitive practices raised my share prices, I would cheer them on. The global market isn't some pre-school playground where everyone is supposed to share and play nice. It is cut-throat, and those who can't be big enough pricks to bury a competitor won't last long.

When I buy a Samsung LCD, it is because they are offering me what I want, not because they are the nicest kid on the playground. Same with Intel. My next build will most likely have an Intel CPU, even though Intel is one of the most dirty companies in the tech industry. Why? Because I care about me, not competitors to the company whose products I am looking at.

That said, you hardly have a leg to stand on. You are calling him a drama queen, yet you stated in the past that you will never forgive MS for what they supposedly did to Google.


RE: no more Samsung
By Spuke on 6/16/2014 5:29:33 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
You can't deny that Samsung has been guilty of anti-competitive practices. They have been found guilty of that more that once. But really, who cares? If I were a shareholder, and those anti-competitive practices raised my share prices, I would cheer them on. The global market isn't some pre-school playground where everyone is supposed to share and play nice. It is cut-throat, and those who can't be big enough pricks to bury a competitor won't last long.
DAMN!!! I actually agree with this.


RE: no more Samsung
By Reclaimer77 on 6/16/2014 5:37:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
yet you stated in the past that you will never forgive MS for what they supposedly did to Google.


Uhh, that just doesn't sound like something I would say. I still buy MS products, I JUST bought a copy of 8.1. I'm not being all like "omg boycott MS because" whatever like he is being.

I agree with the rest of your post. The idea that Samsung is evil-bad because they LOWERED prices, thus you wont buy their products, is just stupid talk.

We have companies like Google giving stuff away for free in order to gain marketshare. Is that evil-bad too? Where do we draw the line?

Seems like ritualm is advocating Economic Communism, even if he doesn't realize it.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki